Oliver Peter wrote:
> Dear,
>
> According to my previous email (ezjail / 6.2-RELEASE-p3) I would
> like to ask where to post such messages (for best results :-P ).
>
> What's about having a jail secific mailinglist like
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
For ezjail related questions (and sometimes just jail
Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
>> Brett Glass wrote:
>>
>> So CDDL does not require to license add-ons under CDDL, GPL does. In
>> this terms, FreeBSD is basically an add-on to the ZFS module ;-).
>
> The mos
Brett Glass wrote:
> At 10:55 AM 4/14/2007, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
>
>> Example:
>> You create a binary from two source files.
>>
>> 1. one BSD one CDDL. If you distribute this binary, you have to provide
>> the CDDL part (and all modifications to it) as sourc
Brett Glass wrote:
> There is a huge problem in that the CDDL is "viral." It "infects"
> products with which it is combined. You can read the text of the
> CDDL at
>
> http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php
>
> Section 3.1 of the CDDL is the portion which is essentially equivalent
> to the
Brett Glass wrote:
> I just read with some concern the announcement that Sun's ZFS has been
> integrated into the FreeBSD kernel. This would mean, unfortunately, that
> FreeBSD is now covered by the CDDL, which is a viral license similar to
> the GPL. Has FreeBSD abandoned its longstanding practice
Mark Messier wrote:
> I have a remote machine running 4.8-p21. The system has two disks in
> it, but only one is used on a daily basis (the other is filled via dd
> every now and then).
>
> I want to get this remote machine running 6.2, so I figured I'ld
> install the new OS on the second disk, t
Jim Stapleton wrote:
>
> Issue not confused, but it did give me some "try this" tests.
> Unfortunately I still cant connect to anything outside of the jail,
> not even to the host.
> SSHing into jail does not work, into host does.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07:54:40 (0) /usr/ports > jail /jail/ legolas
Jim Stapleton wrote:
> new host rc.conf:
>
> hostname="elrond.ameritech.net"
> #ifconfig_nve0="inet 192.168.1.84 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> ipv4_addrs_nve0="192.168.1.84-85/24 netmask 255.255.255.0"
/24 is already the netmask.
Can you ping the ipaddr. from another host in your network?
greetings,
Jim Stapleton wrote:
> Jail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 14:04:11 (0) ~ > sudo jail /jail/ legolas 192.168.1.85
> /bin/csh
> %telnet 192.168.1.4 25
> Trying 192.168.1.4...
> ^Z
> Suspended
> %kill %1
> [1]Terminatedtelnet 192.168.1.4 25
> %ifconfig -a
> nve0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>
Jim Stapleton wrote:
> Thank you, that's at least useful testing, but it did not work. Jail
> is definetly not getting any network action.
>
> Would a host netstat output be useful? I looks pretty cryptic.
Can you please post the output of ifconfig and jls. From your rc.conf it
seems the ipaddr.
Frank Staals wrote:
> I'm trying to get my FreeBSD gateway with PF firewall to only allow
> acces to my network and internet from a couple computers through MAC
> filtering. I couldn't realy find out what rules I should use; From the
> information I found on google I tried something like this but i
Agus wrote:
> Hi
> doing a netstat -an i see that syslog is listening in UDP port 514.i am
> trying to disable it, but no luck
> i checked the rc.conf but there is nothing there.what do u
> recommend? to
> disable it or to leave it?
> I do not use the machine as a remote syslog serv
Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I lately aquired an SuperMicro PDSMi+ motherboard and the IPMI
> AOC-IPMI20-E daughterboard. I can report that the ipmi driver in 6.2 is
> working just fine and I can use ipmitool to access the module from the
> hostsystem. The only proble
Hi,
I lately aquired an SuperMicro PDSMi+ motherboard and the IPMI
AOC-IPMI20-E daughterboard. I can report that the ipmi driver in 6.2 is
working just fine and I can use ipmitool to access the module from the
hostsystem. The only problem is that the IPMI module loses its network
connection and is
14 matches
Mail list logo
