Denis Lemire wrote:
I would like to setup Heimdal Kerberos and use OpenLDAP to store its database.
Too my knowledge the kerberos installation in the base of FreeBSD 5.4
does not support LDAP. I could install from ports but then I end up
with two kerberos installations which is sure to give me a
Hello,
I run an application which segsfaults in the libpthread library and I
wonder if it could be possible enable debuging info in this libraries.
By now I added -g to the list the global compile flags but the symbols
are stripped by the installation script.
how could I get system libraries
Hello,
I'm testing a new configuration with heimdal and the ldap backend
but kadmin is completely ignoring the ldap directive in the dbname
definition.
last cvsup of the ports was yesterday and LDAP was defined in
the heimdal port config:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/security/heimdal# make
JP wrote:
I need some help trying to locate or how to obtain/build a file
named mkhomedir.so this file is needed to create home directories
after logging in successfully though winbind. I am running FreeBSD 5.3
Release, and Samba 3. I am unable to locate this file anywhere.
I'm using
Loren M. Lang wrote:
Certain tasks that have been doing on FreeBSD like installing ports seem
to interrupt my music playing. Particually when portupgrade is
extracting/checksumming and when it is updating the package database.
Now to try and solve this I tried to set xmms to use realtime priority
Kenneth Culver wrote:
but then why does read/write tests over raw devices performs so bad?
AFAIK on raw devices not filesystem, journaling, caches, etc are
involved.
___
Like I said before, you might not have been testing the throughput of
the disks,
Kenneth Culver wrote:
but then why does read/write tests over raw devices performs so bad?
AFAIK on raw devices not filesystem, journaling, caches, etc are
involved.
___
Like I said before, you might not have been testing the throughput of
the disks,
I'm out of ideas, It doesn't matter if I use other PC or hard disks,
performance
sucks compared to Linux :-(
Any advice or idea about the possible cause?
I can't believe this difference of throughput with ata disks.Hello Martin,
for linux it took about 23 seconds write the file and 18 read it.
#
Hello Martin,
for linux it took about 23 seconds write the file and 18 read it.
# time dd if=/dev/zero of=aa bs=1024k count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
real0m23.408s
user0m0.000s
sys0m4.470s
# time dd if=aa of=/dev/null bs=1024k
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
real
Chris Howells wrote:
On Friday 15 October 2004 09:57, fandino wrote:
I'm out of ideas, It doesn't matter if I use other PC or hard disks,
performance
sucks compared to Linux :-(
OK, so you came to conclusion that performance sucks based on the the
theoretical throughput figures using dd and /dev
Subhro wrote:
sysctl -a | grep dma ?
vfs.iodmaxidle: 120
vfs.nfs.iodmax: 20
hw.ata.ata_dma: 1
hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1
hw.busdma.free_bpages: 128
hw.busdma.reserved_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.active_bpages: 0
hw.busdma.total_bpages: 128
hw.busdma.total_bounced: 0
hw.busdma.total_deferred: 0
Kenneth Culver wrote:
well, my usage pattern is write a big file and few seconds later read
it. So my tests
were valid for the use of the computer.
But you have reason, I must provide a more formal report. I redid all
test
with bonnie++ and results shows Linux (56848 K/sec) two times faster
Hello list,
This is an interesting issue. While I was installing FreeBSD 5.3BETA7
I wonder about the performance that the new branch will bring to my
computer, and it was a deception how bad FreeBSD performs compared
with Linux on the same hardware (even I repeat the test on different PC
with
13 matches
Mail list logo
