hi patrick,
If I remember correctly there was no password file for in the jail. I
think you have to rerun a certain command. Of course I do not remember the
command :( The command should create the master password database.
using the ServiceJail model, after populating the jail skeleton and
hi wesley,
I have a jail running in a ZFS environment.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % jls
JID IP Address Hostname Path
3 192.168.1.100 asterisk /u/jails/asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % mount | grep data
data on /u (zfs, NFS exported, local,
hi,
i've FBSD/amd64 62Rp9 installed. kernel world are my own builds
from latest cvsup.
on boot I see:
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader
odd. i'd expect a native loader ...
checking in,
/usr/src/sys/boot ls
Makefile alpha/arm/ efi/ forth/ia64/ pc98/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Synopsis: misc/help2man incorrectly insists on p5-* dependency when already
installed as CPAN module
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: arved
State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 3 08:36:07 UTC 2007
State-Changed-Why:
It is unecessary to reopen another
note(s) to self:
help2man port is borked.
every other port with perl-module dependencies is fine ...
freebsd folks not interested in fix.
do a manual install instead.
problem solved.
outa here.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
hi,
You have perl modules installed, that have no corresponding installed
FreeBSD port.
i do not use BSDPAN -- it's sloppy about its dependency mgmt.
as i do on every other os/platform, i use ONLY native cpan/cpanp.
i have dozens of cpan-installed perl-modules. cpan/cpanp manage the
I have now fixed it so that the exim port doesn't need to set WITH_BDB_VER?=1
anymore. Instead setting either WITH_BDB or WITH_BDB_VER 1 will make the
port use Mk/bsd.database.mk to choose the version of BDB to use, otherwise it
will default to the system BDB.
The updated patch is in PR
hi,
i'm trying to do 1:1 (nat?) *outbound* address mapping using pf, but
NOT 'whole server' binat, but rather a single addressport. i'm close,
but no cigar ... any suggestions?
details follow ...
thanks!
i've a block of 8 static IPs, x.x.x.1 - x.x.x.8.
freebsd6.2-Rp5+pf are installed as my
hi,
though the prob's been fixed, just to ack/comment ... the issue 4 me
was that pf itself was not starting, not that it had started but the
rules were not loaded, or some such ...
Reloading the rules is supposed to allow pf to pick-up new interfaces,
which is why it's done after ppp is
hi,
Funny thing is, I doubt I'd have noticed it without your blank line!
heh. well, glad i could help! i live to serve ;-)
cheers!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
hi,
Hello, it's your niggly proofreader
:-D
(and fellow Stephenson fan)
!!
If you really have that blank line before 'add default HISADDR' above,
then it marks the end of your default section. The 'add default' and
the two lines following will not be executed.
I expect you'll want the
well, per Ian's catch/suggestion, removing the 'blank line' from my
ppp.conf, and moving,
add default HISADDR
to the ppp1: connection stanza seems to have done the trick! pf
loads properly on reboot.
swithc it back, and it does not.
so, guessing, it's the lack of a default root as a result
hi,
Have you any particular reason to think that this is really a problem?
Given that /etc/rc.d/ppp automatically reloads the pf rules after the
tun device is created.
though the prob's been fixed, just to ack/comment ... the issue 4 me
was that pf itself was not starting, not that it had
hi,
i've fbsd 6.2R/p5, with pf compiled into a custom kernel.
on boot, pf is, apparently, not starting.
but, if i exec
/etc/rc.d/pf start
immediately after boot to prompt is done, then all's OK.
the only related (?) messages -- error or otherwise -- i've found are
on startup.
any
On 6/4/07, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
without seeing your pf.conf ruleset,
happy to send/post if required/helpful ...
I guess you're using a ppp
connection to your upstream provider and firewalling on the tunX
interface (using tun0 as $ext_if).
you're absolutely correct here.
As
hi,
I really don't know whether this might be related to your problem, but
my proofreading eye was distracted by this in your rc.conf:
# PPP
ppp_enable=YES
ppp_mode=ddial
ppp_nat=NO
ppp_profile=ppp`
What rc would make of that backtick inside quotes, I know not ..
wow! good eye.
hi,
I'm not sure there is, I've had a similar problem like this before,
and I got around
it by writing a simple script that would try and ping a local site 4
times, and if no
responses got back it would killall ppp and delete the default routes
and tell ppp
to reconnect. It worked quite well
Yes, it puzzles me why it happens in the first place, but as it hits the XP,
linux and BSD connections equally frequenly, I am assuming it is a function
of hardware or IP provider.
fwiw, looking at your conf, my ppp.conf contains one setting that
yours does not ...
enable tcpmssfixup
there's
hi,
i've installed FreeBSD v6.2-RELEASE, plus 'portconf' 'ccache' from ports.
i've setup,
/etc/make.conf
-
PERL_VER=5.8.8
PERL_VERSION=5.8.8
USE_OPENSSL_PORT=true
OPENSSLBASE=/usr/local
USE_OPENSSH_PORT=true
WITHOUT_X11=yes
CPUTYPE?=pentium-mmx
CFLAGS=
I'd direct this question to the ports@ mailing list.
fair enough. thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
i've an install of FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE.
base ssl is:
/usr/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.7e-p1 25 Oct 2004
i've installed openssl from ports,
`which openssl` version
OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007
i'm trying to get a ports-build of
21 matches
Mail list logo
