Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting to post it to the list.
A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused in data risk
security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less breached OS in a
sample of more that 200K computers permanently connected to the internet.
http://mi2g.net/
Richard Cotrina wrote:
Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting to post it to the list.
A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused in data risk
security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less breached OS in a
sample of more that 200K computers permanently connected to the inter
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:12:54 -0500 (PET), Richard Cotrina wrote
> Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting to post it to the list.
>
> A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused in data risk
> security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less breached OS in a
> sample of more tha
Richard Cotrina wrote:
Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting to post it to the list.
A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused in data risk
security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less breached OS in a
sample of more that 200K computers permanently connected to the inter
--- Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Cotrina wrote:
>
> >Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting
> to post it to the list.
> >
> >A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused
> in data risk
> >security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less
> breached OS i
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Richard Cotrina wrote:
Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting to post it to the
list.
A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused in data risk
security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less breached OS in a
sample of more that 200K computers permanent
Jorn Argelo wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:12:54 -0500 (PET), Richard Cotrina wrote
Perhaps this is an old news, but it's interesting to post it to the list.
A recent study made by MI2G, an UK company focused in data risk
security, shows that *BSD and MacOS X were the less breached OS in a
sample of
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:45:38 +0100, Henrik W Lund
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I read somewhere that UNIX systems are more vulnerable to
> buffer overflows than Windows systems. Can't confirm the validity of
> this, though.
>
Buffer overflows are already being addressed.
http://www.o
At 13:50 11/3/2004, terry tyson wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 19:45:38 +0100, Henrik W Lund
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I read somewhere that UNIX systems are more vulnerable to
>> buffer overflows than Windows systems. Can't confirm the validity of
>> this, though.
>>
>
>Buffer ove
