Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 22:18:38 Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:53:10 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
> > The RK05 had one removable platter in a plastic housing.
>
> Please compare the images of the drive and the media.
> Does it look similar?
>
>
>
> Removable platters types E
Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:53:10 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
> > The RK05 had one removable platter in a plastic housing.
>
> Please compare the images of the drive and the media.
> Does it look similar?
>
> Removable platters types EC 5269 in plastic cartridge:
>
> http://www.robot
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:00AM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
>
> > >
> > > AHA. probably an 'RL-05', cousin to the better known "RK-05"
>
> I had a memory fault -- the RLs were the RL-01 and RL-02.
> > >
> > > 14" media, in a 'cartridge'. I -think- it was an 'SMD' interface
> >
> > 14" c
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:53:10 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
> The RK05 had one removable platter in a plastic housing.
Please compare the images of the drive and the media.
Does it look similar?
Removable platters types EC 5269 in plastic cartridge:
http://www.robotrontechnik.de/index.htm?/html/ko
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:06:57 Robert Bonomi wrote:
> > Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > > > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > >
> > > > > when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the mac
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:06:57 Robert Bonomi wrote:
> Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > > > when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the machine has
> > > > had several 5M
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > > >> There may have been a historic reason, but now it is p
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 February 2012 13:20:11 Chip Camden wrote:
> Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> > On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
> > > Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> > > > On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > > >
On 20 February 2012, at 22:20, Chip Camden wrote:
>>> I believe the 5MB removable were RL01. They also had a 10MB removable
>>> RL02, which we used for software distribution. We resold them to our
>>> customers at $170 each.
>>
>> yes, this sound familiar. The RL02 came later.
>>
>> I think t
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:26:03 Chip Camden wrote:
> > Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > > > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
> > >> There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical -
> > >> trying
> > > when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the machine h
Quoth Erich Dollansky on Tuesday, 21 February 2012:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> > On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
> > >> There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical -
> > >> trying
> > > when I got my hands for the first time
Hi,
On Monday 20 February 2012 21:44:43 Da Rock wrote:
> On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >> There may have been a historic reason, but now it is philosophical - trying
> > when I got my hands for the first time on a BSD system, the machine has had
> > several 5MB hard disks.
> >
> >
On 02/18/12 17:47, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 13:05:49 Lars Eighner wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
I've never seen anything listing the main reasons for having /home under /usr
though. I figure there must be a decent reason why. Would anyone car
I vote for multiple partitions with user specified names (or at least
be able to change /home mount point to something else) & allocated
space.
in message <4f3f1817.7030...@herveybayaustralia.com.au>,
wrote Da Rock thusly...
>
> On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
> > --As of February 17, 2012
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of February 18, 2012 2:46:32 PM -0800, Michael Sierchio is alleged to
> have said:
>
>> man hier
True, but /usr/... was a typical place to find users' home
directories, since /usr is mounted when the system goes to
multiuser mode.
/
--As of February 18, 2012 2:46:32 PM -0800, Michael Sierchio is alleged to
have said:
man hier
--As for the rest, it is mine.
...Doesn't mention /home (or /usr/home) once. ;)
Pointing people to the docs which answers their question is good. But
please make sure it actually answers their
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> man hier
>
man 7 hier makes no mention of /home or /usr/home at all ...
___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsub
man hier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:16:34PM -0500, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
> said:
>
> >Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
> >with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
> >default style for sep
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:56:28 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> /usr/local/libexec is used by the programs usually initiated by users.
> As per the man /libexec contains sub programs for those in /bin or /sbin.
>
> The programs are usually run by users, or run as a user themselves
> (multiuser mode).
Daem
On 02/19/12 00:28, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 18/02/2012 13:48, Da Rock wrote:
I was thinking along the lines of continuous heavy load of writing (some
read) rather large files (5G+ would be average - multiple!) - does that
warrant caching or is it only lots of smaller files? That and lots of
~0.5
On 18/02/2012 13:48, Da Rock wrote:
> I was thinking along the lines of continuous heavy load of writing (some
> read) rather large files (5G+ would be average - multiple!) - does that
> warrant caching or is it only lots of smaller files? That and lots of
> ~0.5G files (read mostly) is what define
On 02/18/12 23:39, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 18/02/2012 11:36, Da Rock wrote:
If I may, can I ask a quick question: My main misgivings about ZFS have
been speed, ram use, and up till about a year ago or so relative 'youth'
(at least on FreeBSD). What would be the minimum ram you would use for a
h
On 18/02/2012 11:36, Da Rock wrote:
> If I may, can I ask a quick question: My main misgivings about ZFS have
> been speed, ram use, and up till about a year ago or so relative 'youth'
> (at least on FreeBSD). What would be the minimum ram you would use for a
> high disk use? And what would be reco
Hi,
On Saturday 18 February 2012 13:05:49 Lars Eighner wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
>
> > I've never seen anything listing the main reasons for having /home under
> > /usr
> > though. I figure there must be a decent reason why. Would anyone care to
> > enlighten me? Wha
On 02/18/12 21:39, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:44:13 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
BTW I was intending to put across the concept of /usr being user related
- anything a user may need or use; as opposed to / for the system
related stuff that keeps it running. Maybe I wasn't as clear as I had
On 02/18/12 21:23, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 18/02/2012 10:44, Da Rock wrote:
I have yet to try ZFS (lack of resources really), but when I can I will
setup a SAN and it will be interesting to see how this works and I
probably will use a single partition. But for the general filesystem I
doubt a s
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:44:13 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> BTW I was intending to put across the concept of /usr being user related
> - anything a user may need or use; as opposed to / for the system
> related stuff that keeps it running. Maybe I wasn't as clear as I had
> thought... :)
There's lots
On 18/02/2012 10:44, Da Rock wrote:
> I have yet to try ZFS (lack of resources really), but when I can I will
> setup a SAN and it will be interesting to see how this works and I
> probably will use a single partition. But for the general filesystem I
> doubt a single partition will cut it (I could
On 02/18/12 20:22, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:49 -0600 (CST), Lars Eighner wrote:
It seems to me that partition and mount point are being confused to a
degree. There is no reason what is mounted at /usr/home cannot be a
separate partition as well as if it were mounted at root.
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:05:49 -0600 (CST), Lars Eighner wrote:
> It seems to me that partition and mount point are being confused to a
> degree. There is no reason what is mounted at /usr/home cannot be a
> separate partition as well as if it were mounted at root.
I thought of this fact as such a
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:16:39 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
> > --As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to
> > have said:
> >
> >> Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
> >> with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
On 02/18/12 12:16, Daniel Staal wrote:
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to
have said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
--As of February 17, 2012 11:46:23 PM +0100, Polytropon is alleged to have
said:
Well, to be honest, I never liked the "old style" default
with /home being part of /usr. As I mentioned before, _my_
default style for separated partitions include:
/
swap
/tmp
/var
36 matches
Mail list logo
