Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Apr 22 2010 16:08, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > > I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there > > a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't > > seem to say anything on the subject. >

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Hi-- On Apr 22, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > I think maybe my package database has become corrupted somehow. Is there > a good way to rebuild that from scratch, or fix it? The Handbook didn't > seem to say anything on the subject. Try this sequence: portsdb -Fu pkgdb -aF (Additional

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Apr 22 2010 12:07, Chip Camden wrote: > On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden > > wrote: > > > I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64 > > > > With a recently updated ports tree? What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the > > Makefile? > > > > :g > > # $FreeBSD: po

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Apr 22 2010 18:11, Gabor PALI wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chip Camden > wrote: > > I'm on 8.0-RELEASE amd64 > > With a recently updated ports tree? What is the $FreeBSD$ Id in the Makefile? > > :g # $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ghc/Makefile,v 1.85 2010/04/21 19:53:03 pgj Exp $ Now I'

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

> > But it's working today.  I use portsnap to get the updates -- is there a > delay in that process? Yes - there is. I've found it takes a couple of hours to get the newest updates but once in a while it takes longer. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Apr 22 2010 10:24, Gabor PALI wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden > wrote: > > lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. > > Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on > amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those p

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms. Otherwise it must be okay. Cheers, g. ___

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07:46PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300 > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > > > > Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly > > lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. Th

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > > Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly > lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected > in our -exp run because of being masked by other

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:14:28 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > I've provided some tips for itetcu to work around this on IRC > > (basically disable ccache), but it kind of sucks when you run into > > periodic issues with toolchain variance like this, s.t. building > > with NO_CACHE=yes is a necess

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:40:35 -0700 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, > wrote: > > On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > >> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > >> > >> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. > > > > As far as I know, the gna

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, wrote: > On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. >> >> I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. > > As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be > fine as they're bundled with the libgm

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 2010-04-20 02:14:20, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > > I'm still investigating lang/gnat-gcc44. As far as I know, the gnat-gcc44 bootstrap binaries will be fine as they're bundled with the libgmp library that was used to build them. Whether gcc

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues. It will take a few days to fix lang/ghc. I'm still investi

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Garrett Cooper skrev 2010-04-19 09:28: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating pa

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:25:06 +0200 Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? As written in my previous two or three mails on the subject, for now yes. Xorg is in the second phase of testing, and the rest are waitgin for it. I can't give a firm ETA yet. --

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating packages -- porters have hit some snags wit

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? Thanks /Leslie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

original ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Cc: sta...@freebsd.org, questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-po...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstab

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still unsta

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 > > Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > >  [ .. ] > > > >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod > >>         ===>>> This por

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 > Antonio Olivares wrote: > >  [ .. ] > >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod >>         ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE >>         ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares wrote: [ .. ] > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod > ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE > ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed. Set > SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src > > ===>>> If

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Garret, I have tried the command out, but it apparently does not do the job: ===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for graphics/graphviz ===>>> Launching child to update libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >> devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >>

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Ion-Mihai, > > Does this fix the following issue? > > I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2 > >  I try to use konqueror and I get > >  There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror. >  The diagnostics i

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Ion-Mihai, Does this fix the following issue? I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2 I try to use konqueror and I get There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror. The diagnostics is: Cannot load library /usr/local/kde4/lib/kde4/konq_aboutpage.so: (Shar

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. Pac

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/29/10 12:21, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton > wrote: > > Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip > it internally in any case. > > > Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip > it internally in any case. > Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING have never worked for me in tcsh, I've always had to glob it like Garret stated. > p

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/29/10 02:53, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Besides, when I read `glob' I don't think `regular expression'. A > glob is a simplified extension of regular expressions, I wasn't going for a rigorous definition here. :) However, "simplified" is the correct idea. > The previous method I described

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/29/10 02:27, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png >> That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port >> directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of >> that was (unfortunately) broken

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper : > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>> portmaster -r png- >> >> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just >> have missed it in the docs). >> >> I would have used

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/28/10 19:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>> portmaster -r png- >> >> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just >> have missed it in the docs). >> >> I w

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper : >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >>> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- >>> >>> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:  portmaster -r graphics/png >> >> That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port >> directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of >> that was

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just committed. I'm confu

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> >> The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib >> version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> portmaster -r png- > > Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just > have missed it in the docs). > > I would have used > >  portmaster -r graphics/png

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png Ari -- --> Aristedes Maniatis ish http://www.ish.com

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong text, wrong instructions for portmaster. 20090328: A

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. > > The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib > version bump), with about 5000 po

[ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. We do _NOT_ recommend upda