cpghost wrote:
Hello,
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
This would be somewhat the reverse of
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
I'd prefer to have a way to use a Linux device driver with a
BSD
That's exactly what I'm doing right now. For example when I need
to use my Pinnacle DC10+ (Zoran) card, I simply reboot into Gentoo,
do the capture, and then reboot into FreeBSD to run the rest of
mjpegtools. Same for MIDI recording etc... or other stuff that's
currently unavailable within
On 2006-02-08 10:29, Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's, it
would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD system
(userland, including all third party programs) on top of the Linux
kernel.
I'd prefer to have a way to
Hello,
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
This would be somewhat the reverse of /boot/kernel/linux.ko,
some kind of
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
I'd prefer to have a way to use a Linux device driver with a
BSD kernel.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:48:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
Hello,
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
This would be
On 07/02/06 cpghost said:
Hello,
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
Then run Gentoo Linux. It's the closest
Hello.
On 07/02/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:48:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:15:40AM +0100, Urs Schroffenegger wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:48:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
Hello,
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:44:46PM -0200, Gustavo De Nardin wrote:
Hello.
On 07/02/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:48:05PM +0100, cpghost wrote:
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional*
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:53:57PM +, Dieter wrote:
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of the Linux kernel.
I'd prefer to have a
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 07:59:27PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 07/02/06 cpghost said:
since Linux' support for some hardware is better than FreeBSD's,
it would be nice to have an *optional* way of running a FreeBSD
system (userland, including all third party programs) on top
of
13 matches
Mail list logo
