which pam.d config does telnetd use for authentication when SRA is activated?

2013-08-12 Thread takCoder
connections, it seems pam.d/telnetd authentication config is not applied.. am i right?? then why?! Excuse me for including different questions in one email.. but i found them all related to my need.. Thank you all for your helps and ideas. Best Regards, takCoder

Adding kernel config options?

2013-07-01 Thread Ron Brown
Hi, I am wondering how one would add support for additional options in the kernel configuration files. I have found the config(8) program and the related files '/sys/conf/file' '/sys/conf/options', but am having trouble finding any documentation leading me beyond there. When I specify

9.1-release bridge config at startup not working

2013-04-03 Thread Peter Hunčár
Hello list After pretty much of googling I was able to make this bridge setup up and running: cloned_interfaces=bridge0 ifconfig_bridge0=addm igb6 addm igb7 ifconfig_bridge0_alias0=inet x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x ifconfig_igb6=up ifconfig_igb7=up however I'm running xorp pim multicast router on

kernel config file

2013-03-21 Thread Fbsd8
=yes statement in my kernel config file and the blanktime and warp_saver load modules don't get created. I need the options statements for those items so I can compile then into the kernel. Thanks ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: kernel config file

2013-03-21 Thread Chris Whitehouse
. I have makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes statement in my kernel config file and the blanktime and warp_saver load modules don't get created. I need the options statements for those items so I can compile then into the kernel. Would it be /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES ? %grep warp_saver /usr/src/sys/conf

Re: kernel config file

2013-03-21 Thread Polytropon
helpful. I have makeoptions NO_MODULES=yes statement in my kernel config file and the blanktime and warp_saver load modules don't get created. Have a look at man src.conf for dealing with the creation of modules. I need the options statements for those items so I can compile

Portmaster runs make config three times for some ports

2013-02-09 Thread Mike Clarke
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and left it to get on with it. The next morning I discovered

Re: Portmaster runs make config three times for some ports

2013-02-09 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 9 February 2013 05:45, Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote: I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went

Re: config multiport serial card

2012-11-05 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 04/11/2012 14:42, s m wrote: hello everybody i have a moxa 4-port serial card and installed it on freebsd8.2 successfully. i have ttyu2-5 in /dev that are moxa ports. my question is how i can use these ports? i add the following lines to ttys file: ttyu2 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 vt100 on

config multiport serial card

2012-11-04 Thread s m
hello everybody i have a moxa 4-port serial card and installed it on freebsd8.2 successfully. i have ttyu2-5 in /dev that are moxa ports. my question is how i can use these ports? i add the following lines to ttys file: ttyu2 /usr/libexec/getty std.9600 vt100 on secure ttyu3 /usr/libexec/getty

general ports config question

2012-11-04 Thread Gary Aitken
I've been wanting gimp 2.8.0 (now 2.8.2) for a bit and as it's been slow to show up in the ports collection, thought I would see about building it. Unfortunately, I don't know squat about the process but figured trying it would help slow my brain from atrophying at its currently rapidly

kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread jb
Hi, what controls how parts of kernel are built, that is, built-in or modular ? For example, I want to: - build a kernel that has eveything built in - build a kernel that has everything possible (what controls the impossible ?) built as modules - build a kernel that has mixed support, e.g.

Re: kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 06:41:44 + (UTC) jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, what controls how parts of kernel are built, that is, built-in or modular ? For example, I want to: - build a kernel that has eveything built in this is normally not possible as some thing conflict which each

Re: kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread jb
that she will run config(8) with. What is the specific mechanism (directive in GENERIC file, or something else in GENERIC file or elsewhere) that says build support for cd9660 fs as built-in and ext2fs as module, or entire kernel as built-in, or entire kernel as modular (except things that must

Re: kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread Erich Dollansky
directive lines like 'device', 'options', 'machine', 'ident', 'maxusers', 'makeoptions' etc that the user may place in the kernel configuration that she will run config(8) with. Yes, taken them as examples. What is the specific mechanism (directive in GENERIC file, or You copy GENERIC into a new

Re: kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread jb
Erich Dollansky erichfreebsdlist at ovitrap.com writes: ... What decides about that (built-in or module) ? # kldstat -v |grep cd9660 414 cd9660 # kldstat -v |grep ext2fs 151 0xc9911000 11000ext2fs.ko (/boot/kernel/ext2fs.ko) 538 ext2fs jb

Re: kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:51:38 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: The modules are always build, at least to my knowledge. So, you do not need any options for this. You just need to load them later. The means of /etc/src.conf can be used to skip certain things during a kernel + world build. For

Re: kernel config

2012-10-25 Thread jb
jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes: ... What decides about that (built-in or module) ? # kldstat -v |grep cd9660 414 cd9660 # kldstat -v |grep ext2fs 151 0xc9911000 11000ext2fs.ko (/boot/kernel/ext2fs.ko) 538 ext2fs That was already clarified. jb

Re: Where are the mechancs of config(8) descibed

2012-09-11 Thread Vincent Hoffman
On 11/09/2012 01:30, Robert Bonomi wrote: (This is probably a bit techical for 'questions' -- I'd welcome a suggesstion of a more appopriae forum.) If you dont get any joy, try freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org Vince Is there a detailed description anywhere of the mechanics of *how* config(8

Where are the mechancs of config(8) descibed

2012-09-10 Thread Robert Bonomi
(This is probably a bit techical for 'questions' -- I'd welcome a suggesstion of a more appopriae forum.) Is there a detailed description anywhere of the mechanics of *how* config(8) does what it doess? I'm looking fo the gory detail of how, sayi, 'device bpf' causes the creation of the file

TLS config help

2012-08-29 Thread AN
Following the directions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/openssl.html Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps # openssl dsaparam -rand -genkey -out myRSA.key 1024 # openssl gendsa -des3 -out myca.key myRSA.key # openssl req -new -x509 -days

Re: TLS config help

2012-08-29 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 29.08.12 12:38, schrieb AN: Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps I use: cd /etc/mail/certs Create a CA: - Edit /etc/ssl/openssl.cfn - default_days= 1825 - Generate CAcertificate - /usr/src/crypto/openssl/apps/CA.pl -newca cp demoCA/cacert.pem . Create a key:

Re: TLS config help

2012-08-29 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ Matthias Fechner wrote on Wed 29.Aug'12 at 11:20:37 +0200 ] Am 29.08.12 12:38, schrieb AN: Trying to configure TLS and sendmail using the following steps I use: cd /etc/mail/certs Create a CA: - Edit /etc/ssl/openssl.cfn - default_days= 1825 - Generate CAcertificate -

Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help

2012-08-14 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote: FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I have is that neither clamav or

Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help

2012-08-14 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ Andrea Venturoli wrote on Tue 14.Aug'12 at 10:22:14 +0200 ] On 08/14/12 08:51, AN wrote: FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav +

Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help

2012-08-14 Thread Wojciech Puchar
the above). At least, that's how I do it. or, you could consider using Postfix. It's much easier to configure and implement content filters. depends of who is talking and how easiness is defined. Postfix is different. That's all. ___

sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help

2012-08-14 Thread Robert Huff
AN writes: I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or receive email. I would like the server to do the following: This has been running fine for years on one of my machines. Do

Re: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help

2012-08-14 Thread Robert Bonomi
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Aug 13 21:55:24 2012 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:51:17 -0400 (EDT) From: AN a...@neu.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243

sendmail + clamav + spamassasin config help

2012-08-13 Thread AN
FreeBSD mail.neu.net 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #2 r239243: Mon Aug 13 19:20:19 EDT 2012 r...@mail.neu.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I am trying to configure sendmail + clamav + spamassasin. The problem I have is that neither clamav or spamassasin runs when I send or

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-08 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I think it's likely that it is a 64-bit installation. Not sure about that. How could the amd64 OS be installed and run on a i386 machine? it cannot. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-08 Thread pulley
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686 CPU. By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I tried both: you've got into wrong directory /usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-07 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686 CPU. By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I tried both: you've got into wrong directory /usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-07 Thread Wojciech Puchar
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Openresolv Config

2012-08-07 Thread Iqbal Aroussi
Hi Can you please give some hints on configuring Openresolv on FreeBSD-9 My server is configured with DHCP, but I want to change the nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf to use mein. Thanks in advance Best Regards -- * Iqbal Aroussi * ___

Re: Openresolv Config

2012-08-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 07/08/2012 14:05, Iqbal Aroussi wrote: Can you please give some hints on configuring Openresolv on FreeBSD-9 My server is configured with DHCP, but I want to change the nameservers in /etc/resolv.conf to use mein. I'm not sure that Openresolv is necessarily the right thing to use. This is

Re: Openresolv Config

2012-08-07 Thread Iqbal Aroussi
Hi Matthew, Thank you so much for your quick reply. How Can I override using openresolv/resolvconf or configuring it for static IP on a server ? Currently my servers are configured with DHCP by the webhost company. I prefer to have them configured with static IP but right now I'm stuck on the

Re: Openresolv Config

2012-08-07 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
== Iqbal Aroussi wrote on Tue 7.Aug'12 at 14:00:06 + == Hi Matthew, Thank you so much for your quick reply. How Can I override using openresolv/resolvconf or configuring it for static IP on a server ? Currently my servers are configured with DHCP by the webhost company. I prefer to

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-07 Thread Robert Bonomi
set my cpu type in kernel config ? That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer. *PRECISELY* why the OP is having problems. He _is_ trying to build amd64 kernel

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-07 Thread Polytropon
...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ? That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-07 Thread RW
To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ? That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-07 Thread Polytropon
: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ? That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC Jason: It looks like you may

Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-06 Thread Jason Usher
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686 CPU. By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I tried both: cpu I586_CPU and: cpu I686_CPU (I also tried them both lowercase, like i686_cpu) But all of these fail: GENERIC:

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-06 Thread Michael Sierchio
make LINT vi LINT On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Jason Usher jushe...@yahoo.com wrote: I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686 CPU. By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I tried both: cpu I586_CPU and: cpu

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-06 Thread RW
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Jason Usher wrote: I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686 CPU. By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I tried both: That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC

Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?

2012-08-06 Thread Chris Hill
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, RW wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Jason Usher wrote: I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686 CPU. By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I tried both: That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC

Re: ports: make config-recursive doesn't really

2012-06-11 Thread Thomas Mueller
/usr/port/$port make config-recursive cd ../.. done would allow me to set up all the dependencies before continuing with the install. It appears, however, that it doesn't really recurse properly. I say appears only because this is my first time trying this and despite doing the above

ports: make config-recursive doesn't really

2012-06-10 Thread Gary Aitken
I'm trying to build a script to rebuild and reinstall everything I have installed from ports. I don't want to have to keep checking on it and filling out the appropriate check boxes for options. I naively assumed: for port in $ports do cd /usr/port/$port make config-recursive

Re: ports: make config-recursive doesn't really

2012-06-10 Thread Subhro Sankha Kar
don't want to have to keep checking on it and filling out the appropriate check boxes for options. I naively assumed: for port in $ports do cd /usr/port/$port make config-recursive cd ../.. done would allow me to set up all the dependencies before continuing

mail server config

2012-02-02 Thread AN
I'm getting ready to install a new mail server. I want to configure sendmail+clamav+spamassassin+mimedefang. Does anyone have some pointers or howto docs to share? I read somewhere that spamassassin-milter has security issues. Is mime-defang a better option or should I consider something

Re: mail server config

2012-02-02 Thread Walt Elam
I'm getting ready to install a new mail server. I want to configure sendmail+clamav+spamassassin+**mimedefang. I believe postfix is considered to be much more secure and better then sendmail overall. I have a mail server and find that postfix was pretty easy to setup and configure. In

Re: lang/lua fails to build on 9.0-STABLE amd64 - bug or config issue?

2012-01-24 Thread ill...@gmail.com
? If this is a config issue, any hints on what might be going on or how to dope it out? I think I had the same problem about a moth ago. The problem was my CFLAGS in make.conf. You probably have CFLAGS=something, try setting it to CFLAGS?=something. We note above that: CFLAGS= -O2 -fno-strict

lang/lua fails to build on 9.0-STABLE amd64 - bug or config issue?

2012-01-23 Thread Lee Thomas
to understand whether this patch represents a bugfix or a workaround of some local configuration issue. Has anyone run into this issue before? If this is a config issue, any hints on what might be going on or how to dope it out? Thanks for your help, Lee Thomas The details: #date Mon Jan 23 18:01:30

Re: lang/lua fails to build on 9.0-STABLE amd64 - bug or config issue?

2012-01-23 Thread Roland Smith
=== lua-5.1.4_6 depends on executable: pkg-config - found === Configuring for lua-5.1.4_6 === Building for lua-5.1.4_6 After builing, I get the following for lapi.*: # sha256 work/lua-5.1.4/src/lapi.* SHA256 (work/lua-5.1.4/src/lapi.c

Re: lang/lua fails to build on 9.0-STABLE amd64 - bug or config issue?

2012-01-23 Thread Christer Solskogen
matters for me, but I don't understand the port infrastructure well enough to understand whether this patch represents a bugfix or a workaround of some local configuration issue. Has anyone run into this issue before? If this is a config issue, any hints on what might be going on or how to dope

COMPAT_* kernel config options -- some housecleaning overdue?

2012-01-15 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
I've been wondering for a while now about the accuracy of some of the comments in /sys/conf/NOTES re: the various COMPAT_* options, and now, with 9.0-RELEASE already out the door and 10.0-CURRENT as the current development branch, it seems even more relevant to ask just how necessary or useful

Re: COMPAT_* kernel config options -- some housecleaning overdue?

2012-01-15 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: I've been wondering for a while now about the accuracy of some of the comments in /sys/conf/NOTES re: the various COMPAT_* options, and now, with 9.0-RELEASE already out the door and 10.0-CURRENT as the current development branch, it seems even more relevant to

Re: .config

2011-12-19 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 30 November 2011 14:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: A dirty workaround might be to link /.config to something innocuous.  One could obvio- usly also have /.config mounted as a tmpfs(5). So it couldn't persist from boot

Re: .config

2011-12-19 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:48:23 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 November 2011 14:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: A dirty workaround might be to link /.config to something innocuous.  One could obvio- usly also have

Re: .config

2011-12-19 Thread ajtiM
On Monday 19 December 2011 12:43:42 Polytropon wrote: On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:48:23 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 November 2011 14:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: A dirty workaround might be to link /.config

Some troble in the kernel config file

2011-12-13 Thread Oleg simonoff
Hi users! I`ve got some trouble in the kernel configuration. I think,there is somebody able to help me See the attached files. Many thanks for attention. dmesg.boot Description: Binary data newkernel.2011-10-12 Description: Binary data ___

Re: .config

2011-11-30 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:40:19 -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote: A dirty workaround might be to link /.config to something innocuous. One could obvio- usly also have /.config mounted as a tmpfs(5). So it couldn't persist from boot to boot. The cleanest solution is to forgo qt/kde

Re: .config

2011-11-30 Thread ill...@gmail.com
is when I start KDE4 with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4 as user I got it again. Inside is a file Trolltech.conf (the same is in /home/.config). That file seems to be part of Qt. How can

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-28 Thread Thomas Mueller
On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com writes: What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-28 Thread b. f.
Now I think I'll try to rebuild the kernel with options ATA_CAM and drop device atapicam. This question needs to be better resolved in time for FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE. I cross-post this message to freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org so the developers will see it. FreeBSD users want to be able to burn

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-28 Thread Lowell Gilbert
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com writes: The handbook does contain some oblique and scattered references to the new code, or at least to constructs that are common to both the old and the new code, but the addition of a brief discussion of the differences between the new and old ATA code in the

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-27 Thread b. f.
What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated? They are redundant and incompatible. atapicam is deprecated, and ATA_CAM

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-27 Thread Lowell Gilbert
b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com writes: What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated? They are redundant and incompatible

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-27 Thread b. f.
On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com writes: What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-26 Thread Thomas Mueller
Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net writes: What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated? Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions

Re: options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-25 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net writes: What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated? As far as I can see, ATA_CAM isn't

.config

2011-11-23 Thread ajtiM
Hi! I succesfully installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2 and I didn't have problems with bsdinstall and others. What I didn't have on 8.2 is when I start KDE4 with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4 as user I

options atapicam and/or device ATA_CAM in kernel config?

2011-11-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
What is the role of options atapicam and device ATA_CAM in kernel config file? Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprecated? I am trying to burn a CD (or DVD) on a SATA DVD-RW drive, but cdrtools don't work. Also, how

Re: .config

2011-11-23 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:39:21 -0600, ajtiM wrote: Hi! I succesfully installed FreeBSD 9.0 RC-2 and I didn't have problems with bsdinstall and others. What I didn't have on 8.2 is when I start KDE4 with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home but what it happened

Re: .config

2011-11-23 Thread ajtiM
.config in /. I have one .config in /home but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4 as user I got it again. Inside is a file Trolltech.conf (the same is in /home/.config). That file seems to be part of Qt. How can it be created outside your $HOME when you startx

Re: .config

2011-11-23 Thread ajtiM
on 8.2 is when I start KDE4 with startx I got directory .config in /. I have one .config in /home but what it happened? When I deleted as root and I start again KDE4 as user I got it again. Inside is a file Trolltech.conf (the same is in /home/.config). That file seems to be part of Qt

Re: DNS config help

2011-11-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote: I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x, and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a specific domain. This sounds like a job for a

Re: DNS config help

2011-11-03 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 11/3/11 8:51 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 02/11/2011 20:52, AN wrote: I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x, and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a

Re: DNS config help

2011-11-03 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote: You can simply create a forward zone. Actually, yes, that's a good idea too. Should have much the same effect and it's been available in BIND approximately forever. There's difference in the niggling details of how it all works, so worth

Re: DNS config help

2011-11-03 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 11/3/11 11:35 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 03/11/2011 10:00, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Actually, using a view that matches only the VPN's IP range would do the trick easily and efficiently. Views are a way of giving a different answer depending on who is asking the question -- how does

DNS config help

2011-11-02 Thread AN
I have a question about how to configure DNS. My local network is 10.x, and I sometimes need to connect to a remote VPN. My question is how do I configure BIND to forward queries to a different server only for a specific domain. When I am connected to the VPN, vpn.example.com, I want

Re: DNS config help

2011-11-02 Thread Michael Sierchio
It depends... some VPNs push routes, including default routes, and nameservers and search paths, but it's up to the client on how to handle it. Some of these will set /etc/resolv.conf, etc. What *kind* of VPN are you talking about? OpenVPN? PPTP? L2TP? I generally prefer dnscache to BIND,

Re: config(8) does not add post-processing for source file with compile-with command in sys/conf/files

2011-10-21 Thread Paul Ambrose
There are many other compile-with not started with ${NORMAL_C}, your patch adds ${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} to them too, which could not be suitable for this. 2011/10/19 Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com: I have run into the same issue recently.  I have been testing the following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE)

Re: config(8) does not add post-processing for source file with compile-with command in sys/conf/files

2011-10-19 Thread Ryan Stone
I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to have worked for me: --- mkmakefile.c 11:09:30.0 -0400 +++ mkmakefile.c2011-10-06 11:13:31.0 -0400 @@ -742,15 +742,16 @@ break;

Re: pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 gives wrong -I dir

2011-06-27 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, June 25, 2011 a las 07:20:52PM -0500, Dan Nelson escribió: Checking Solaris and SUSE Linux, I see a similar pair of directories: solaris$ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include linux$ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 -I/usr/include

Re: pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 gives wrong -I dir

2011-06-25 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jun 25), Matthias Apitz said: Why gives $ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include $ ls -ld /usr/local/include/glib-2.0 /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include ls: /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include: No such file or directory

pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 gives wrong -I dir

2011-06-24 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, Why gives $ pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include $ ls -ld /usr/local/include/glib-2.0 /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include ls: /usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include: No such file or directory drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 May 28 19:01 /usr

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-06-06 Thread Chuck Swiger
On May 30, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: Perhaps this is the one you meant? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html That's the one! Thanks! Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-06-01 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: Perhaps this is the one you meant? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html That's the one! Thanks! Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-05-31 Thread b. f.
Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: Perhaps this is the one you meant? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html That's the one! Thanks! Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems removal of those

I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-05-30 Thread Warren Block
Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that suggested it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a kernel config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, AFAIR. Naturally I didn't save that post or a link to it. Can anyone find

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-05-30 Thread Adam Vande More
in a kernel config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, AFAIR. Naturally I didn't save that post or a link to it. Can anyone find that message, or explain why it would be good to keep either of those cpu options in a kernel that will only run on much newer CPUs? Um, I don't

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-05-30 Thread Adam Vande More
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: Some time back, there was a post on one of the mailing lists that suggested it was better to leave either I486_CPU or I586_CPU enabled in a kernel config even for much newer processors. For performance reasons, AFAIR

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-05-30 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Adam Vande More wrote: Perhaps this is the one you meant? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-January/190568.html That's the one! Thanks! Actually the two threads touch on the same subject, and it seems removal of those options is still desirable

Re: I486_CPU or I586_CPU in kernel config

2011-05-30 Thread Adam Vande More
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: sys/i386/i386/support.s is mentioned, but doesn't seem to have anything explicitly specific for 586. There are some i686 entries. A test for cpu_class==CPUCLASS_586 in /sys/i386/isa/npx.c is mentioned in the thread, but

serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config

2011-02-01 Thread Paul Macdonald
I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the handbook: Is it boot.conf or boot.config? Create boot.config in the root directory of the a partition on the boot drive.

RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config

2011-02-01 Thread Patrick Mahan
-Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Macdonald Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 7:24 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config I'm

Re: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config

2011-02-01 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 01), Patrick Mahan said: From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Macdonald I'm trying to get the dell bmc +sol serial thing working, kin dof getting there, but noticed this inconsistency in the

RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config

2011-02-01 Thread Patrick Mahan
opinion of Adara Networks. -Original Message- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnel...@allantgroup.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:52 AM To: Patrick Mahan Cc: Paul Macdonald; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config In the last

RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config

2011-02-01 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mahan wrote: It's at the root - # echo /boot.conf -P Line 78 of sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c says: #define PATH_CONFIG /boot.config Also, there's boot.config(5). If boot.conf also works, maybe it's only looking for a match on the first 8 or 9

RE: serial config handbook: /boot.conf or /boot.config

2011-02-01 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Warren Block wrote: On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Patrick Mahan wrote: It's at the root - # echo /boot.conf -P Line 78 of sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c says: #define PATH_CONFIG /boot.config Also, there's boot.config(5). If boot.conf also works, maybe it's only looking

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >