Re: 4 GB file limit? (WAS gzip from ports vs gzip from system)

2005-06-27 Thread Norberto Meijome
Sean Hafeez wrote: windows limit. 4gb file size limit. Hi Sean, I wish it was as simple as blaming MS for this one, but no - i tested this locally on the w2k box (dd cmd making 5 GB file), and then by actually running the dump | gzip nfs_share (7 GB .gz) but using nfs v3, mounted by hand

4 GB file limit? (WAS gzip from ports vs gzip from system)

2005-06-26 Thread Norberto Meijome
to recap: dump | gzip nfs_share_on_w2k_NAS_running_ServicesForUnix This works fine until the size of the file created on the nfs_share is just under 4 GB (originally thought 2 GB problem) Client : FBSD 4.11, cvsuped April 15th 05, world + kernel. Server : Win2K-Storage server, SP4, Microsoft

Re: 4 GB file limit? (WAS gzip from ports vs gzip from system)

2005-06-26 Thread Norberto Meijome
Garrett Cooper wrote: I am not entirely sure what the issue may be, but NTFS does definitely support file sizes beyond 2 Gb; I think that the only FS'es that don't do that still are Fat based or ext2, but I could be wrong. u're right. Also, I'm not entirely sure which version of NFS

Re: 4 GB file limit? (WAS gzip from ports vs gzip from system)

2005-06-26 Thread Sean Hafeez
windows limit. 4gb file size limit. On Jun 26, 2005, at 4:36 AM, Norberto Meijome wrote: to recap: dump | gzip nfs_share_on_w2k_NAS_running_ServicesForUnix This works fine until the size of the file created on the nfs_share is just under 4 GB (originally thought 2 GB problem) Client :