TECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthias
> Trevarthan
> Sent: 25 September 2002 15:00
> To: Barry Byrne; Lowell Gilbert
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 4.6.2 filesystem efficiency
>
>
> Neat. Has anyone benchmarked this thing? Are there any reports
> th
Neat. Has anyone benchmarked this thing? Are there any reports that detail the
performance increase? (And the RAM increase, I'm guessing)
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 09:49, Barry Byrne wrote:
> Matthias:
>
> I think it was introduced in 4.4 but only enabled in the default kernel
> from 4.5 on
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthias
> Trevarthan
> Sent: 25 September 2002 14:41
> To: Lowell Gilbert
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 4.6.2 filesystem efficiency
>
>
> At what point in time was this feature intr
At what point in time was this feature introduced? I have a number of
4.6.1-p10 systems that were upgraded from 4.4-RELEASE.
Matthias
> DIRHASH was standard in the GENERIC kernel by 4.6.2, so you should be
> fine with hundreds of thousands of files. Just make sure that you
> have "options UFS
Matthias Trevarthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi.
>
> My company runs FreeBSD 4.6.2 on three different servers. Two of these servers
> handle a good bit of mail. Currently we use sendmail, but we're moving
> towards a switch to qmail and maildir.
>
> I think maildir will significantly in
Anyone?
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 15:42, Matthias Trevarthan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> My company runs FreeBSD 4.6.2 on three different servers. Two of these
> servers handle a good bit of mail. Currently we use sendmail, but we're
> moving towards a switch to qmail and maildir.
>
> I think maildir wil
Hi.
My company runs FreeBSD 4.6.2 on three different servers. Two of these servers
handle a good bit of mail. Currently we use sendmail, but we're moving
towards a switch to qmail and maildir.
I think maildir will significantly increase the number of files on our disk.
We may have to increas
