Re: 5.1 -> 5.2 disaster

2004-01-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:16:22PM -0600, Michael Clark wrote: > Assuming that happened somehow, which is hard to believe because I scripted > the process and have upgraded this machine before It's exactly what happened; this user error is reported quite a lot (and I've run into it myself when I h

RE: 5.1 -> 5.2 disaster

2004-01-29 Thread Michael Clark
because it requires I take the box offline and offsite -Original Message- From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:19 PM To: Michael Clark; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: 5.1 -> 5.2 disaster -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

Re: 5.1 -> 5.2 disaster

2004-01-29 Thread Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 29 January 2004 02:54 pm, Michael Clark wrote: > First off, this is not a hardware problem! It crashes at the exact same > spot over and over on multiple different commands. > > I had a 5.1 - 5.2 upgrade via cvsup that went terribly wrong.

5.1 -> 5.2 disaster

2004-01-29 Thread Michael Clark
First off, this is not a hardware problem! It crashes at the exact same spot over and over on multiple different commands. I had a 5.1 - 5.2 upgrade via cvsup that went terribly wrong. The machine got rebooted and certain things would no longer work. I cannot get a make world, or make buildworl