On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:30:48PM -0600, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 3/5/2010 6:28 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
The amd64 arch installer for 8.0-RELEASE fails to start on a ThinkPad T60
with an Intel Centrino Core Duo. What am I doing wrong?
error message:
CPU doesn't support long mode
Hello folks
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion started by me regarding
abysmal read/write performance using ZFS mirror on 8.0-RELEASE. I was
using an Atom 330 system with 2GB ram and it was pointed out to me
that my problem was most likely having both disks attached to a PCI
SIL3124
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLANP
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5460 @ 3.16GHz (3158.77-MHz 686-class CPU)
I am just reading this (the marked as 5xx numbers has me confused):
# Intel 64-bit Xeon™ (“Nacona”). This processor is fabricated on 90nm
process
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Paul Halliday wrote:
http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLANP
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5460 @ 3.16GHz (3158.77-MHz 686-class
CPU)
I am just reading this (the marked as 5xx numbers has me confused):
The CPU you are looking up is a
Hi folks,
My current machine is a amd64 system running freebsd 8.0. For a java
application I need libswt and wanted to know if there is a native version for
freebsd amd64. Also I need to know which port install this library, so what I
should install to get it.
BrgdsDino
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:07:51AM -0800, Dino Vliet wrote:
Hi folks,
My current machine is a amd64 system running freebsd 8.0. For a java
application I need libswt and wanted to know if there is a native version for
freebsd amd64. Also I need to know which port install this library, so what
In the last episode (Feb 17), Dino Vliet said:
My current machine is a amd64 system running freebsd 8.0. For a java
application I need libswt and wanted to know if there is a native version
for freebsd amd64. Also I need to know which port install this library,
so what I should install to get
Hello-
I have a server box with an Intel s5000vcl motherboard and 2 dual-core
Xeon procs. I was hoping to run FreeBSD 8 on it, but when I try to boot
the amd64 media I get
panic: No BIOS smap info from loader:
I've Googled about and found chatter relating to the message, but no
work-around
was that it indicated that the Windows driver made API
calls that were not implemented in the NDIS wrapper.
This was a 64-bit Windows driver and an amd64 FreeBSD system. Similar
results in both
FreeBSD 7.2 and 8.0.
It appears that kern/132672 is describing the same or a very similar
issue. It also
FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21
15:02:08 UTC 2009 r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
During 'make buildworld' the machine regulary crashes with the following
panic:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual adress
ms80 wrote:
Hi
I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
machine.
The computers specs are:
cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
hdd: 2xMaxtor STM31000528AS
nic: 4x Intel(R) PRO/1000
[snip]
So here are my
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 11:38:25 schrob Michael Powell:
ms80 wrote:
Hi
I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
machine.
The computers specs are:
cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
hdd: 2xMaxtor
On 6 February 2010 22:18, ms80 m...@dynamik.sytes.net wrote:
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 11:38:25 schrob Michael Powell:
ms80 wrote:
Hi
I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
machine.
The computers specs are:
cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
board: Gigabyte
ms80 wrote:
[snip]
Thank you for your reply.
I'm using two of this: OCZ3P1333LVAM4GK
(OCZ DDR3 AMD Edition, rated for 1333MHz at 1.65V). My Board is rated for
1066 - 1600 MHz memory, and neither the website nor the manual say
anything about limitations with memory. Anyway: I didn't
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 14:03:06 schrob David N:
[snip]
What power supply do you have?
How many watts? brand?
If you have insufficient power, it may cause the system to become unstable.
Regards
David N
I tested with an Enermax EPR425AWT Pro82+ II, 425W wich was the psu I bought
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 14:37:16 schrob Michael Powell:
ms80 wrote:
[snip]
There seems to be a general feeling the newer AMD processors don't much
care for higher memory voltages. Try lowering your voltages and see if it
helps.
I am successfully using this board with the CPU clock
/1000
and I'm running
FreeBSD phenom2.localnet 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Nov 21
15:02:08 UTC 2009
r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
During 'make buildworld' the machine regulary crashes with the following
panic:
Fatal trap 12: page fault
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/
2010/2/4 Bc. Radek Krejca ra...@ceskedomeny.cz:
Hello,
I found this - now I am waiting if this will be in ports:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142120
Radek
___
hi,
i just wanted to upgrade my current 7.2 to 8.0 and wanted to do it from
scratch so downloaded 8.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.gz.
But the md5 mentioned here
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html is :
MD5 (8.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 44c016ae8812a266f710d1845722366d
And the md5 i am
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Shripad R. shripad...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
i just wanted to upgrade my current 7.2 to 8.0 and wanted to do it from
scratch so downloaded 8.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.gz.
But the md5 mentioned here
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.0R/announce.html is :
MD5 (8.0
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:07:30AM +0530, Shripad R. wrote:
MD5 (8.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 44c016ae8812a266f710d1845722366d
MD5 (8.0-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.gz) = add311be2d189cde1d47ba515c05f440
totally different. Can somebody plz confirm ?
Yes. Different files, different hash
Dan Naumov wrote:
[j...@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test2 bs=1M count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes transferred in 143.878615 secs (29851325 bytes/sec)
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds /
Hello,
I have bought new notebook with GeForce GTX 260M and installed amd64
distribution of freebsd 8 because of 4GB RAM.
Is there any way to run OpenGL (get drivers for this graphics card)?
Thanks
Radek
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi
Did you try the binary driver x11/nvidia-driver? Your card should be supported.
2010/2/3 Bc. Radek Krejca ra...@ceskedomeny.cz:
Hello,
I have bought new notebook with GeForce GTX 260M and installed amd64
distribution of freebsd 8 because of 4GB RAM.
Is there any way to run OpenGL (get
Hello,
I found this - now I am waiting if this will be in ports:
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=142120
Radek
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/
I have the card described later on the
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI
It depends on the bandwidth of the bus that it is on and the controller
itself.
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with
a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100
meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is,
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=HIPMI=Y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about
Alexander Motin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for
Note: Since my issue is slow performance right off the bat and not
performance degradation over time, I decided to start a separate
discussion. After installing a fresh pure ZFS 8.0 system and building
all my ports, I decided to do some benchmarking. At this point, about
a dozen of ports has been
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single mirror, which means you won't have any speed
benefit regarding writes,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
ZFS writes to a mirror pair
requires two independent writes. If these writes go down independent I/O
paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. If the
writes
go through a bandwidth-limited shared path
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :(
The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and
On 23 January 2010 01:14, Nerius Landys nlan...@gmail.com wrote:
There probably are some. If you are only interested in FreeBSD ports, you
can make a list of which ports you need and then inspect their Makefiles to
see if there's a flag disabling them on the amd64 architecture.
OK thanks
I've got a system currently running FreeBSD-i386-8.0, and was wondering
whether or not it's possible to move the system to FreeBSD-amd64-8.0
without bringing it down for more than a reboot or two (and avoid
reinstalling all of the client software on the box itself).
The box itself
I'm in the process of purchasing a small Nehelem-based server (Xeon
L5506 CPU to be exact). I will be installing some flavor of FreeBSD
8.0 (either i386 32 bit or amd64 64 bit, to be exact). I have no
immediate need for a 64 bit server, as none of the processes that I
will be running
Nerius Landys wrote:
I'm in the process of purchasing a small Nehelem-based server (Xeon
L5506 CPU to be exact). I will be installing some flavor of FreeBSD
8.0 (either i386 32 bit or amd64 64 bit, to be exact). I have no
immediate need for a 64 bit server, as none of the processes that I
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:16:53PM -0600, LoH wrote:
I've got a system currently running FreeBSD-i386-8.0, and was wondering
whether or not it's possible to move the system to FreeBSD-amd64-8.0
without bringing it down for more than a reboot or two
It is possible, but not recommended. First
There probably are some. If you are only interested in FreeBSD ports, you
can make a list of which ports you need and then inspect their Makefiles to
see if there's a flag disabling them on the amd64 architecture.
OK thanks. Could you give me an example of a port that is disabled on
64 bit
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:16:53 -0600
LoH lordofhyph...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got a system currently running FreeBSD-i386-8.0, and was
wondering whether or not it's possible to move the system to
FreeBSD-amd64-8.0 without bringing it down for more than a reboot or
two (and avoid reinstalling all
complicated and risky procedures for the hell of it, you are
going to be better off just starting from scratch and reinstalling using
an AMD64 .iso. It's going to be quicker to reinstall anyhow.
Cheers,
Matthew
OK, that's what I needed to know. It just didn't seem as if something as
complex
you're the sort of person that likes doing
terribly complicated and risky procedures for the hell of it, you are
going to be better off just starting from scratch and reinstalling using
an AMD64 .iso. It's going to be quicker to reinstall anyhow.
Cheers,
Matthew
OK, that's what I
for desktop use.
Is it possible to change an i386 install to amd64 without needing to start
from scratch? I was poking around reading some stuff, and ran across this in
in /usr/src/Makefile:
# If TARGET=machine (e.g. ia64, sparc64, ...) is specified you can
# cross build world for other machine types
with no concerns for desktop use.
Is it possible to change an i386 install to amd64 without needing to start
from scratch? I was poking around reading some stuff, and ran across this in
in /usr/src/Makefile:
# If TARGET=machine (e.g. ia64, sparc64, ...) is specified you can
# cross build world
I could be mistaken, but that sounds like an awfully big /var and
/usr. Are you sure this is a vanilla install that no one has touched?
the install is running off the i386/amd64 disc1 .iso. /usr is with /usr/ports
Len
-- randi
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Len Conrad lcon
On Saturday 12 December 2009 22:44:54 Rolf G Nielsen wrote:
Mario Lobo wrote:
On Saturday 12 December 2009 21:23:00 Rolf Nielsen wrote:
Where's that? The Nvidia site says nothing about it yet, and the
makefile for x11/nvidia-driver still says ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386. I'm
eagerly waiting for
it on amd64 before, it
might be that it doesn't work well on 64 bit. But since I'm not really a
gamer, I don't worry much about it, though it would be fun to get it
running.
I'm running Windowmaker as my window manager, and it doesn't make use of
any OpenGL AFAIK.
So basically all I've
At 11:50 AM 12/10/2009, you wrote:
fbsd 7.2
amd64
kernel developer install
Here's a successful install du
du -d1 -h /
2.0K/.snap
2.0K/dev
1.8G/usr
1.6G/var
1.7M/etc
2.0K/cdrom
2.0K/dist
1.1M/bin
206M/boot
6.7M/lib
396K/libexec
2.0K/media
2.0K
I could be mistaken, but that sounds like an awfully big /var and
/usr. Are you sure this is a vanilla install that no one has touched?
-- randi
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
At 11:50 AM 12/10/2009, you wrote:
fbsd 7.2
amd64
kernel developer install
fbsd 7.2
amd64
kernel developer install
Here's a successful install du
du -d1 -h /
2.0K/.snap
2.0K/dev
1.8G/usr
1.6G/var
1.7M/etc
2.0K/cdrom
2.0K/dist
1.1M/bin
206M/boot
6.7M/lib
396K/libexec
2.0K/media
2.0K/mnt
2.0K/proc
4.0M/rescue
Hey everyone,
Yesterday I wanted to update my system currently running 8.0-RC1 amd64
to the latest 8-STABLE release. However buildworld failed. I found out
the problem seems to pop up when trying to build the lib32 libraries. If
I build lib32 without ccache everything on itself everything
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:57:17 +0100
Frank Staals franksta...@gmx.net wrote:
Hey everyone,
Yesterday I wanted to update my system currently running 8.0-RC1
amd64 to the latest 8-STABLE release. However buildworld failed. I
found out the problem seems to pop up when trying to build the lib32
Hi,
I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
Dear TeXLive team,
I created 6 sets of FreeBSD binaries of TeXLive2009, for FreeBSD 6, 7
and 8, each for i386 and amd64:
http://anthesphoria.net/FreeBSD/TeXLive
acheron wrote:
Hi,
I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
This is great news, thanks for sharing. I was looking forward to get
TexLive 2009 running on FreeBSD.
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:30:48 +0200, Manolis Kiagias son...@otenet.gr wrote:
acheron wrote:
I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
This is great news, thanks for sharing. I was looking forward to get
Hi,
I just got the news of someone who build binaries of TeXlive 2009.
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-November/023783.html
This is great news, thanks for sharing. I was looking forward to get
TexLive 2009 running on FreeBSD.
Absolutely, have either of you tried it out yet?
You can build your own binaries by tweaking an svn checkout of the
TeXlive sources. I've done this on my laptop, because I run CURRENT
and the old TeXlive 2008 binaries failed to run:
snip
I think I kept notes while building the binaries. If I manage to find
them soon-ish I will post a
Hi!
I'm tying to install FreeBSD amd64 on a system with the following configuration:
- CPU: AMD Phenon X4 9550
- Motherboard: DFI LanParty DK 790FX-M2RS - AMD 790FX + SB600 (Award
BIOS / AWRDACPI)
- Memory: 4Gb
- Video board: ATI Radeon 3870
Booting the installation CD-ROM works fine
Hi!
I'm tying to install FreeBSD amd64 on a system with the following configuration:
- CPU: AMD Phenon X4 9550
- Motherboard: DFI LanParty DK 790FX-M2RS - AMD 790FX + SB600 (Award
BIOS / AWRDACPI)
- Memory: 4Gb
- Video board: ATI Radeon 3870
Booting the installation CD-ROM works fine
Hi,
i made the download of FreeBSD amd64 and i wanna know if the amd64 is the same
as x86_x64.
thank you very much.
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 04:27:54 -0800 (PST)
Clayton Wilhelm da Rosa claytonwilhel...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
Hi,
i made the download of FreeBSD amd64 and i wanna know if the amd64 is
the same as x86_x64.
Yes, it's the same. amd64, x86_64 and x64 are all the same architecture.
--
Bruce Cran
2009/11/5 B. Cook bc...@poughkeepsieschools.org
I have a few machines that have less than 4GB of ram, but they are adm64..
does zfs make sense/work in that case?
7.x or 8.rc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
adapter
This is unnecessary and bad. pae should be used on i386 for large memory
support, amd64 in some ways exists so you don't have to run pae which is a
considerable performance hit. I'm surprised that actually works.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd
Hi Richard,
Kernel recompilation part of the handbook is fairly straightforward
and should walk you through step-by-step without any snags: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
Just remember to use amd64 instead i386 in the examples @ the link
2009/10/29 Richard Gehlbach rdgeh...@gehlbach.com:
I am installing FreeBSD 7.2 / amd64 on a new server (HP DL370 G6) with 2
quad Xeon processors and 16GB memory. I have worked with the i386 versions
since version 3.x, but this is the first server large enough to need amd64.
I have been
I am installing FreeBSD 7.2 / amd64 on a new server (HP DL370 G6) with 2
quad Xeon processors and 16GB memory. I have worked with the i386
versions since version 3.x, but this is the first server large enough to
need amd64.
I have been trying to determine the correct procedures
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:52 PM, Richard Gehlbach rdgeh...@gehlbach.comwrote:
I am installing FreeBSD 7.2 / amd64 on a new server (HP DL370 G6) with 2
quad Xeon processors and 16GB memory. I have worked with the i386 versions
since version 3.x, but this is the first server large enough
==
So, is there a definite, unique answer?
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
irqs 32-55 on motherboard
ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 64-87 on motherboard
thanks,
Len
==
So, is there a definite, unique answer?
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
It matters very much. AMD64 should work fine. IA64 will will not work at all
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Len Conrad lcon...@go2france.com wrote:
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
You wont even et IA64 booting as that is a compilation for Itanium
processors.
For the 64bit enabled Xeon processors Intel licensed the AMD64 instruction
irqs 32-55 on motherboard
ioapic2 Version 2.0 irqs 64-87 on motherboard
thanks,
Len
==
So, is there a definite, unique answer?
Yes.
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
Yes.
Run AMD64. It is not an Itanium which is the IA64
Does it matter whether I run IA64 or AMD64 in the above Dell 1850?
Len
This is a case where I wish the architecture types were renamed to modern day
nomenclature. Most people outside the *nix world know i386 as the x86
architecture and AMD64 as either x86-64 or straight x64. IA64
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
No you want: IA64 not AMD64
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:48, lconrad@ wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Yes.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:48:26PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:08 PM, jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
No you want: IA64 not AMD64
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/7.2/
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:48, lconrad@ wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:08:23PM -0400, jhell wrote:
No you want: IA64 not AMD64
No, he does not want that. IA64 is for Intel's Itanium CPUs which are only
used in a few big servers and just about nowhere else. The below is an
ordinary x86 CPU (which the Itanium most certainly
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:10, rsmith@ wrote:
Yes.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:48:26PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote:
the FreeBSD 6.2 i386 dmesg.boot shows:
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz (3591.25-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Get cpuid from /usr/ports/misc/cpuid and run it, that should give you a
better idea of what your processor is. Although, from the string you
gave, looks like a 'yes'. I think that's a nocona xeon (I have a pair of
gallatins).
jhell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:10, rsmith@ wrote:
Yes.
On
Hello.
Is it possible to get bootable cd with auto selectable amd64/i386 boot?
For instance , i have a bootable cd with two kernels:
* first is located in /boot/kernel.amd64
* second in /boot/kernel.i386
loader.conf has line /kernel=kernel.amd64/
When it boots on amd64 incompatible hardware
Hello,
I'm trying to build VirtualBox 3.0.51.r22902_2 on 7.2-stable amd64 and
I keep getting the following failure:
kBuild: Compiling RuntimeR0Drv -
/usr/tmp/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/assert-r0drv-freebsd.c
In file included from
with FreeBSD 7.2 (amd64) and gnome2 ?
This problem didn't occur with FreeBSD 7.2 i386 iso.
Regards,
Roy Stuivenberg.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Leandro F Silva fsilvalean...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1060
I voted and added a coment
gather some more signatures from recent subscribers.
Cheers
herb langhans
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:25:53PM -0300, Leandro F Silva wrote:
Hey guys,
Let's vote to have a native i386 / amd64 flash player \o/ ..
We just have to create an account and voting on the link below =D
http
Message: 29
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 23:45:18 -0600
From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
Subject: Re: Voting for a native i386/amd64 flash player
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: 20091004054518.gd37...@guilt.hydra
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Oct 03
501 - 600 of 2012 matches
Mail list logo
