Help! I just used freebsd-update to upgrade a system to FreeBSD
9.1-RELEASE-p5 to close the latest security holes. I then rebuilt
my custom kernel and tried to reboot. I'm now getting the message
Can't work out which disk we are booting from.
Guessed BIOS device 0x not found by probes,
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, free...@johnea.net wrote:
One of the complications was getting old metadata off of the drive. After
trying a couple of 'dd' invocations:
# overwriting the first sector
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ada0 bs=512 count=1
# also tried overwriting the last sector
diskinfo ada0 | cut -
On 2012-11-20 21:10, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, free...@johnea.net wrote:
>
>> On 2012-11-20 14:28, Gary Aitken wrote:
>>> On 11/20/12 13:34, free...@johnea.net wrote:
>>
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC3
>> ...
"Not UFS" "No ada0" "No boot"
>>
>>>
>>> Seems like it isn'
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 11/21/12 05:11, Warren Block wrote:
gptboot looks for the first UFS partition. Maybe /boot/boot can be
modified to do that also.
It's a little more complicated than that Warren.
AIUI gptboot first looks (in partition order) for partitions with bo
On 11/21/12 05:11, Warren Block wrote:
gptboot looks for the first UFS partition. Maybe /boot/boot can be
modified to do that also.
It's a little more complicated than that Warren.
AIUI gptboot first looks (in partition order) for partitions with both
the bootme and bootonce attributes set.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, free...@johnea.net wrote:
On 2012-11-20 14:28, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 11/20/12 13:34, free...@johnea.net wrote:
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC3
...
"Not UFS" "No ada0" "No boot"
Seems like it isn't supposed to work for 9.1-RC2
I previously used binary update t
On 2012-11-20 14:28, Gary Aitken wrote:
> On 11/20/12 13:34, free...@johnea.net wrote:
>> freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC3
...
>> "Not UFS" "No ada0" "No boot"
>
> Seems like it isn't supposed to work for 9.1-RC2
>
I previously used binary update to migrate from 9.0 to 9.1, via:
freebsd-upd
On 11/20/12 13:34, free...@johnea.net wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed a 9.1-RC2 system using gmirror with MBR, and swap in
> first bsdlabel.
>
> orsbackup# gpart show
> =>63 3907029104 mirror/gm0 MBR (1.8T)
>63 63 - free - (31k)
>
Hello,
I recently installed a 9.1-RC2 system using gmirror with MBR, and swap in first
bsdlabel.
orsbackup# gpart show
=>63 3907029104 mirror/gm0 MBR (1.8T)
63 63 - free - (31k)
126 3907028979 1 freebsd [active] (1.8T)
390702
did you rebuild the world?
Ran makeworld and installworld twice to be sure of the version number
staying the same :)
-Reko
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
did you rebuild the world?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/After-freebsd-update-tp4438777p4439202.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
You have applied the update successfully. You won't see any
difference
in the output from uname(1) because this update when applied via
freebsd-update(8) doesn't touch the kernel. It only affects
named(8).
This is the patched version in 8.2-STABLE:
% /usr/sbin/named -v
BIND 9.6.-ESV-R4-P
On 30/05/2011 09:49, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> My system still is shows #0
>
> 8.2-RELEASE #0
>
>
> Following the latest FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-11:02.bind
>
> I did
>
> # freebsd-update fetch
> # freebsd-update install
>
> And a reboot, but my system doesn't indicate the update!
My system still is shows #0
8.2-RELEASE #0
Following the latest FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-11:02.bind
I did
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
And a reboot, but my system doesn't indicate the update!
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
/Leslie
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/06/2010 14:34:43, n dhert wrote:
> When doing a major version upgrade of FreeBSD, the last (mandatory) step is
> to rebuild and reinstall all third party software (ports)
> (# portupgrade -af )
>
> I have a system with 750+ ports, I guess the po
Clears out the old libs, sorry. Prediction playing up!
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote. There's a bug report on
it!
On 15 Jun 2010 14:57, "Chris Rees" wrote:
You're generally ok until you run make delete-old, which clears out the old
kind and hoses any port linked to them.
So
You're generally ok until you run make delete-old, which clears out the old
kind and hoses any port linked to them.
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote. There's a bug report on
it!
On 15 Jun 2010 14:35, "n dhert" wrote:
When doing a major version upgrade of FreeBSD, the last (mand
When doing a major version upgrade of FreeBSD, the last (mandatory) step is
to rebuild and reinstall all third party software (ports)
(# portupgrade -af )
I have a system with 750+ ports, I guess the portupgrade -af will take
something like 30 hours to compile
(on a test system with 425 ports port
> That handbook section is where I read:
> "The default is to update the source code, the entire base
> system, and the kernel."
First, freebsd-update tool sync the source.
> And in fact much of the /usr/src/ does contain source
> code.
>
> /usr/src/sys/ subdirectories seem populated, and some
On 2010-03-14 05:39, Alexandre L. wrote:
Please read the handbook section related to the FreeBSD update tool
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
freebsd-update is a binary update tool, so you haven't got anything to rebuild,
except you
g one).
--- En date de : Dim 14.3.10, johnea a écrit :
> De: johnea
> Objet: building from source after freebsd-update
> À: "FreeBSD Questions"
> Date: Dimanche 14 mars 2010, 3h37
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been using freebsd-update to update several 7.1
> sys
On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:10 PM, johnea wrote:
> guess I was lead to believe that it updated the source from this entry in
> the handbook:
>
> "The default is to update the source code, the entire base system, and the
> kernel."
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupd
On 2010-03-13 19:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
freebsd-update provides a binary update mechanism.
It doesn't do anything to update the source files; if you choose to rebuild
from source, use cvsup/csup/svn; you will normally get a -STABLE system from
the build cycle, and not a -RELEASE system, but
On Mar 13, 2010, at 7:37 PM, johnea wrote:
> I have been using freebsd-update to update several 7.1 systems.
> [ ... ]
> How can I build the source updated by freebsd-update?
freebsd-update provides a binary update mechanism.
It doesn't do anything to update the source files; if you choose to reb
Hello,
I have been using freebsd-update to update several 7.1 systems.
The default freebsd-update.conf contains:
Components src world kernel
Recently while trying to build sendmail to enable SASL I ran into errors:
host# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail
host# make depend
make: don't know how to
rebuilt and
distributed.
It can be done. The power of FreeBSD!
- Marwan Sultan
System Administrator
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:35:44 +0100
From: free...@edvax.de
To: dead_l...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: After freebsd-update - all went wrong.
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14
Thank you
- Marwan Sultan
System Administrator
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:35:44 +0100
> From: free...@edvax.de
> To: dead_l...@hotmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: After freebsd-update - all went wrong.
>
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:06:48
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:06:48 +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
> well, I have fixed problem two by installing back my custom kernel.
> but the system still ignores the "defaultroute" command in rc.conf
> this is why we have manuly added to the rc.local
Is this possibly a spelling error? The setting
net 66.xx.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0"
Thank you.
> Subject: Re: After freebsd-update - all went wrong.
>
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:31:13 +, Marwan Sultan
> wrote:
> > i'm on FreeBSD 7.2-R p4
> > I just applied :
> > # freebsd-update fetch
> > # freebsd-u
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:31:13 +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
> i'm on FreeBSD 7.2-R p4
> I just applied :
> # freebsd-update fetch
> # freebsd-update install
> with no problems
Later you mentioned that you run a custom kernel,
especially for inclusion of quota. When using the
freebsd-update tool, you
Hello FreeBSD people.
i'm on FreeBSD 7.2-R p4
I just applied :
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
with no problems
After i restarted the server
i lost my ssh connection, server went down!
I have contacted the hosting company, and after investigation
they info
Hello,
I'm not certain of the following. I think you needed to update to 6.3
first and after the first update, install compat6x. Regardless, you
may be able to recover by doing 'freebsd-update rollback'. That will
undo the most recent changes and hopefully get you a working system.
_
I was using freebsd-update to upgrade from 6.2 to 7.0-RELEASE. The upgrade
and install of the kernel went fine, then I reran freebsd-update after
rebooting to get the userland stuff. Midway through installing updates,
I got the error:
Installing updates.../libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared obje
Hi Colin,
Thanks for your reply.
> What makes you think that the crypto code is missing?
When I try to install www/apache20 from ports, I get this error:
Dependency error: this port requires the OpenSSL library, which is part of
the FreeBSD crypto distribution but not installed on your
machine.
Matt Bostock wrote:
> I've been using freebsd-update for some time now and it's been fantastic. I
> recently used Colin's upgrade script[1] to upgrade to 6.2-RELEASE, but it
> seems
> that the crypto distribution is now missing from my system.
What makes you think that the crypto code is missing?
Hello,
I've been using freebsd-update for some time now and it's been fantastic. I
recently used Colin's upgrade script[1] to upgrade to 6.2-RELEASE, but it seems
that the crypto distribution is now missing from my system.
With previous versions of freebsd-update I would have used --branch, but l
36 matches
Mail list logo
