On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 07:40:37PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
Have a look at midori.
--
Harald Weis
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:16:05AM +0100, Harald Weis wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 07:40:37PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 19:40:37 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
I just use a hosts file and it works well (as long as you're not running
a web server on port 80 of the
All I use is Adblock Plus. With the automatic updates I havent seen any
ad for month..
herb langhans
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Quoting herbert langhans w...@langhans.com.pl:
All I use is Adblock Plus. With the automatic updates I havent seen any
ad for month..
I'll second this endorsement, i've been using it for a good few years
now and I just works :)
Mike Woods
Full of squishy cynicism
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 19:40:37 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
Simply deactivate Flash. :-)
There are several extensions for Firefox to make the web less
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:32:35 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
Today I don't need to deal with this question anymore. I've
been using a two browsers approach: Firefox with Flash
installed, everything works as intended, and Opera as my
main browser, with Flash deactivated, and quite picky
about what
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:44:18PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
07.01.2013, 05:43, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
gary
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Twenty-six
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
itHOught I'd ask the best list which ad-blocking software I should
use.
firefox is my std browsers; also use ixquick.
thanks for some tips,
gary
For firefox I use the following:
having to much to do right now, I needed a little break,
and, well, I like humor, and making people laugh.
Of course, this COULD actually be a neat idea if done right lol.
Anyway, I Hope someone gets a good laugh out of this. I'm generally
actually pretty good with coming up with ideas, as I'm
like mario, countra, for the user
who doesn't knows programming language.
Please, suggest is this project can be given for GSOC, if not plz suggest
me some project idea.
Thank you,
Punit Tiwari
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Careful reading, as opposed to blindly applying updates, is often
rewarded. If you aren't running telnetd, it follows that you are not
vulnerable to the most serious exploit addressed by the patch (remote
root).
I have had no trouble since applying the patch to 7.4 and 8.2 systems. YMMV.
Given
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:20:12 +1100
David Morton wrote:
I'm very new to BSD, and had a career that left me mostly doing
commercial IT help desk in Windows, but am hoping to finally learn
and do something of interest to me: get deep knowledge of one
platform.
A local magazine, Silicon Chip;
I'm very new to BSD, and had a career that left me mostly doing
commercial IT help desk in Windows, but am hoping to finally learn and
do something of interest to me: get deep knowledge of one platform.
A local magazine, Silicon Chip; and one of it's writers have developed a
little computer
I'd love to have this discussion on the list for the record, in case someone in
the future wants to give this a shot, too.
On Nov 7, 2011, at 6:20 PM, David Morton wrote:
I'm very new to BSD, and had a career that left me mostly doing commercial IT
help desk in Windows, but am hoping to
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:20 PM, David Morton toto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm very new to BSD, and had a career that left me mostly doing commercial
IT help desk in Windows, but am hoping to finally learn and do something of
interest to me: get deep knowledge of one platform.
A local magazine,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:20 PM, David Morton toto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm very new to BSD, and had a career that left me mostly doing commercial
IT help desk in Windows, but am hoping to finally learn and do something of
interest to me: get deep knowledge of one platform.
A local magazine,
Is it wrong to have functions with the same name
in multiple archives? E.g:
% ar -t /usr/local/lib/libslatec.a | grep fdump.o
fdump.o
% ar -t /usr/local/lib/libcmlib.a | grep fdump.o
fdump.o
Which fdump function will be used if I then link
against -larchive1.a -larchive2.a?
And is there an easy
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Anton Shterenlikht
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:08 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: same function name in multiple archives - bad idea
modem, with just DHCP set up.
The hotel is composed of 33 small residences connected with fiber. The idea
is to avoid the part where we buy 33 layer3 switches at 3000$ a piece.
Jerome Herman
I work for a hotel as well and we ended up going with a 3rd party solution
due to our chain's
?
Jerome Herman
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Jerome Hermanjher...@dichotomia.frwrote:
Hello,
Given the price (an tedious management) of layer 3 switches I was thinking
about using modified DHCP to distribute addresses with a /32 netmask
(255.255.255.255)
The Idea : Create a cheap
addresses with a /32 netmask
(255.255.255.255)
The Idea : Create a cheap (and preferably not dirty) way to have client
isolation, without creating tons of vlan.
Pratictal overview : The DHCP server will be serving IP addresses and
gateways with a /32 mask.
Client1 would recieve IP adress
management) of layer 3 switches I was
thinking
about using modified DHCP to distribute addresses with a /32 netmask
(255.255.255.255)
The Idea : Create a cheap (and preferably not dirty) way to have client
isolation, without creating tons of vlan.
Pratictal overview : The DHCP server will be serving IP
topic for this list.
- Original Message -
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
nat...@vidican.com nat...@vidican.com
Sent: Thu Oct 14 12:56:19 2010
Subject: Re: Is it a good idea
Hello,
Given the price (an tedious management) of layer 3 switches I was
thinking about using modified DHCP to distribute addresses with a /32
netmask (255.255.255.255)
The Idea : Create a cheap (and preferably not dirty) way to have client
isolation, without creating tons of vlan
switches I was thinking
about using modified DHCP to distribute addresses with a /32 netmask
(255.255.255.255)
The Idea : Create a cheap (and preferably not dirty) way to have client
isolation, without creating tons of vlan.
Pratictal overview : The DHCP server will be serving IP addresses
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:36:11PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
- why not let your firewall do the blocking? If your blocking is IP
based that's the place to block.
I'm already under the University firewall. Only port 22 is let through.
But even that filles
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
This is a returning topic, search the archives. Anyway, the returning
answer:
- why not let your firewall do the blocking? If your blocking is IP
based that's the place to block.
, then you can ignore all the brute force
attempts.
I don't allow password based authentication.
- above not a solution? See if you can tweak the sshd_config:
MaxAuthTries
MaxStartups
can slow down brute force attacks preventing it from sucking up resources.
also a good idea
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
- why not let your firewall do the blocking? If your blocking is IP
based that's the place to block.
I'm already under the University firewall. Only port 22 is let through.
But even that filles my logs.
What I meant was that if you want to block IPs or ranges of
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny
Why is it not a good idea?
Also, apparently
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny
Why is it not a good idea?
Also
David Southwell wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny
Why is it not a good
On 1/11/10, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 07:18:04AM -0700, Tim Judd wrote:
On 1/11/10, David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea
Tim Judd wrote:
I've been meaning to check this out. My firewall ssh rules are very
strict, in fact, if the remote IP is unknown meaning, I don't know
where the heck it's coming from, it's blocked. It's easier to say it
this way: I allow ssh connections from IPs I know, preferably static
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd : .evil.cracker.example.com : deny
Why
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:25:04PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need
Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk writes:
I'm very grateful for all advice, but I'm still unsure
why denying ssh access to a particular host via /etc/hosts.allow
is a bad idea.
As far as I recall, the reason the warning was added to the manual was
that it's fairly heavy on resources
Seaman wrote:
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
#sshd
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm thinking of denying ssh access to host from which
I get brute force ssh attacks.
HOwever, I see in /etc/hosts.allow:
# Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a good idea, but if you
# need to do it, here's how
Putting swap on ZFS is listed as broken on the wiki. Is that still true of
the newly MFC'ed version?
--
Kirk Strauser
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Putting swap on ZFS is listed as broken on the wiki. Is that still true of
the newly MFC'ed version?
No idea. You may just make separate partition for swapping and it will
work. Good if you have swap just for sure.
If your system needs swapping under normal operation, using ZFS is really
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 01:36:37 pm Wojciech Puchar wrote:
No idea. You may just make separate partition for swapping and it will
work. Good if you have swap just for sure.
Well, the problem is that I wanted to have a bare-metal ZFS system without
any FreeBSD slices or partitions.
If your
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 01:36:37 pm Wojciech Puchar wrote:
No idea. You may just make separate partition for swapping and it will
work. Good if you have swap just for sure.
Well, the problem is that I wanted to have a bare-metal ZFS system without
any FreeBSD slices or partitions.
slices
hEy guys,
Here's my idea,
And since I'm publishing on the most open of the open-source
list, it'll be hard for anybody to ``steal'', assuming it is
_worth_ stealing.
People seem to be reading less; fact. Listening more. I'm
sure
people, first, the idea i have that could earn some cash very
likely is not new; it is text-to-speech, but in a certain way.
here's my question since recently i heard a computerized voice
speaking so very normally, at first i thought it was human.
thus: how advanced are some of these commercial
and /usr/local) are +x
for the other user, so the www should be able to enter them:
drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel 512 Nov 12 20:38 usr
drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 512 Nov 12 20:24 local
Does anyone have any idea what's causing this permission denied error?
Obviously it's some sort of permissions
have any idea what's causing this permission denied error?
Obviously it's some sort of permissions problem, but I have no idea
where or what exactly it is. It's driving me crazy.
find: .: Permission denied would only be returned, AFAIK, if you were
doing find . someflags, which your find example
Yesterday while I was trying to read a newspaper article online
using firefox yet-another idea struck me. This may/may not work
with FreeBSD ... or is might be crafted for FBSD 1st and later
ported to every other operating system. To avoid flames, I'll
another idea:
3 A Chinese poem in Tang-dynasty style is very short, fitting in 4
lines. Some people find getting familiar with all famous 300 such
poem written in Tang-dynasty a good way to use up brain-power of
the days. They can display
of the
manual (not mentioned in the manual itself). I also worry improving
something that hasn't been changed for 10 years could be difficult
because nobody wish to move them. What should I do or who should I
contact to let them decide if they include my idea in their manual as well?
In fact I think
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, Zhang Weiwu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Zhang Weiwu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: improvement idea of man page of strfile
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Thursday, October 30, 2008, 10:47 AM
Original text:
OTHER USES
What can you do with this besides
mdh wrote:
Erm, I don't see this text in strfile(8) on RELENG_7 which is reasonably
recent. Where did you get your man page from?
- mdh
Hi. Sorry, you are right. This text does not exist in FreeBSD. I have a
freeBSD notebook and a Gentoo Linux notebook. I found this text by using
the
Well, I've finally gotten Konq to exec, but something causes it
to hang instantly whenever I click on an external link. The
wristwatch icon shows up with the hang. Any idea what I'm
missing?
tia,
gary
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the
top of
someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet?
From -security :
Dear all,
Doug just updated the ports tree with the updated BIND ports. If you
urgently want to upgrade and really cannot wait for the
Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the top of
someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet?
--
Paul Schmehl
As if it wasn't already obvious,
my opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.
___
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the serious nature of the vulnerability, I'm sure this is at the top
of someone's list. Do we have a scheduled release date yet?
See the thread BIND update?.
Scott
PS: please do not crosspost.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 7:45 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I was thinking seeing the fact that I already have a cvs repo of
-current does it make sense to just use CVS to update /etc
instead of
mergemaster... if so any ideas on
a jail would run faster and
perhaps be more stable than running the same program within qemu.
Any tips on desirability, feasibility or how to do it would be greatly
appreciated
When I was first looking at this that was my idea but as far I can tell
the jail needs to run the same
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:49:46 -0400 mv wrote:
Would installing Freebsd i386 within a jail on an amd64 host solve his
problem?
I have been running amd64 since it was first released and am quite pleased
with its performance and stability. However, as a desktop there are still a
number of
if I downgrade to i386. So
here is the idea: use qemu to create a virtual version of my machine
(with less then 2GB or RAM) and install i386 8-CURRENT on it (I want to
use -CURRENT for all my installs)
Any thing I should watch out for here (I know I need to use NFS or
something like
and there are a few i386 only ports that I
absolutely must have installed and at the same time since I have 4 GB of
RAM all kinds of bizarreness is created if I downgrade to i386. So
here is the idea: use qemu to create a virtual version of my machine
(with less then 2GB or RAM) and install i386 8
qemu.
Any tips on desirability, feasibility or how to do it would be greatly
appreciated
When I was first looking at this that was my idea but as far I can tell
the jail needs to run the same kernel as the jailing OS.
--
Aryeh M. Friedman
FloSoft Systems
Developer, not Business, Friendly
What would be ideal is if you can tell the OS to treat one CPU as a
virtual machine and run that inside a jail and/or qemu wrapper (wrapper
in that it looks like it is a seperate [emulated] machine to the host OS
but in reality it is just running on partioned CPU and memory on the
same machine)
if I downgrade
to i386. So here is the idea: use qemu to create a virtual
version of my machine (with less then 2GB or RAM) and install
i386 8-CURRENT on it (I want to use -CURRENT for all my installs)
On Sat, 27 October 2007 20:33:44 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I don't think Aryeh wants
I am running amd64 8-CURRENT and there are a few i386 only ports that I
absolutely must have installed and at the same time since I have 4 GB of
RAM all kinds of bizarreness is created if I downgrade to i386. So
here is the idea: use qemu to create a virtual version of my machine
(with less
-- Forwarded message --
From: Astrodog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 26, 2007 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: evil idea
To: Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/26/07, Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running amd64 8-CURRENT and there are a few i386 only ports that I
Hello ! We are sorry if we distrubed you . Your email is in our email
bank . We found out that you are an active bussiness man ,so we were
wondering of you are interested in a bussiness offer . If so , please
check out site for all the info. http://leet.110mb.com We apologise
again
Hello ! We are sorry if we distrubed you . Your email is in our email
bank . We found out that you are an active bussiness man ,so we were
wondering if you are interested in a bussiness idea . If so , please
check out site for all the info. http://leet.110mb.com We apologise
again
Original idea for the setup:
74GB RAID1 (Raptors)
/,/var,/usr
50GB RAID0 (Caviars[10GB from each - maybe less])
swap,/usr/obj,/tmp,[/var/audit]
1TB+ RAID5 (Caviars[the rest])
/home (or just general storage)
The goal is to waste as few fast/reliable space as possible on things
Hello Everyone,
Im about to try a disklayout experiment and I wanted to ask everyone if
Im trying things that are pointless or if I should extend the experiment
somehow.
Hardware:
Highpoint RocketRAID 2320
2xWD Raptor 74GB
5xWD Caviar 320GB
Original idea for the setup:
74GB RAID1
Hello Everyone,
Im about to try a disklayout experiment and I wanted to ask everyone if
Im trying things that are pointless or if I should extend the experiment
somehow.
Hardware:
Highpoint RocketRAID 2320
2xWD Raptor 74GB
5xWD Caviar 320GB
Original idea for the setup:
74GB RAID1
Original idea for the setup:
74GB RAID1 (Raptors)
/,/var,/usr
50GB RAID0 (Caviars[10GB from each - maybe less])
swap,/usr/obj,/tmp,[/var/audit]
1TB+ RAID5 (Caviars[the rest])
/home (or just general storage)
The goal is to waste as few fast/reliable space as possible on things that
CAN
their bandwidth. However,
they want to try increasing their consumption and see
for their self if they will reach the desired
bandwidth if they are actually connecting to any site
in the Internet, outside our network. Running iperf
from their site to us doesn't seem to reflect to the
MRTG. Any idea
if they are actually connecting to any site
in the Internet, outside our network. Running iperf
from their site to us doesn't seem to reflect to the
MRTG. Any idea how to explain this to our client?
Thank you very much for your help
-JaY
__
Do You Yahoo
:02 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Any idea how to stress test our bandwidth?
I hope you don't mind my asking this here.
I'm working in an ISP right now. We are using mrtg for
each client connected to us. They can view their mrtg
statistics. Their way to the internet is to us. Say
Hello...
I was thinking well it was 2 months ago...
FreeBSD I think is one of the most amazing opearting system
ever coded... Stable, fast... etc... etc...
The interfaces (Xwindow, with Kde, Gnome) have reached a very
good level of usage, stable..
There are several problems still???
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter wrote:
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all
back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
Remove fam by force and then install gamin.
What is wrong with running 'pkgdb -F' ? It is there to help
On 2/6/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
Remove fam by force and then install gamin.
I don't want
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
Peter wrote:
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/06, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
On 2/6/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
Into /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf place:
ALT_PKGDEP = {
'gamin*' = 'fam*',
}
maybe?
--
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
Into
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 03:21:43PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My dependency are all foobared up now, How do I change them all back
to fam-2.6.9_6, so I don't have to run pkgdb -F everytime I
portupgrade?
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Björn König wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), there
should be a noticeable difference.
The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile
all in all because of its
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:12:11PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), there
should be a noticeable difference.
AFAIK there is only one difference - 6.9 is traditianaly packaged (6 or
7 big source tgz), while 7.0 is broken smaller source
On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Björn König wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case),
there
should be a noticeable difference.
The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much
On 2/3/06, Stijn Hoop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Björn König wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), there
should be a noticeable difference.
The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:12:11PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:58:25PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just tried out Xorg 7.0 on my Gentoo box and it appears to render a
lot better than the 6.8 tree did. So, I was wondering if there was
On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:53, Björn König wrote:
Garrett Cooper schrieb:
Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case),
there should be a noticeable difference.
The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile
all in all because of its
Kent Stewart schrieb:
On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:53, Björn König wrote:
The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile
all in all because of its modularity. A German magazine tested both:
6.9 took 19 minutes and 7.0 75 minutes on their dual Opteron 246
machine with
On Feb 3, 2006, at 3:39 AM, Björn König wrote:
Kent Stewart schrieb:
On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:53, Björn König wrote:
The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to
compile
all in all because of its modularity. A German magazine tested both:
6.9 took 19 minutes and 7.0
Just tried out Xorg 7.0 on my Gentoo box and it appears to render a
lot better than the 6.8 tree did. So, I was wondering if there was any
approximate timeframe mentioned anywhere where Xorg 7.0 may be coming to
FreeBSD =)?
-Garrett
___
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:58:25PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just tried out Xorg 7.0 on my Gentoo box and it appears to render a
lot better than the 6.8 tree did. So, I was wondering if there was any
approximate timeframe mentioned anywhere where Xorg 7.0 may be coming to
FreeBSD =)?
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:58:25PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just tried out Xorg 7.0 on my Gentoo box and it appears to render a
lot better than the 6.8 tree did. So, I was wondering if there was any
approximate timeframe mentioned anywhere where Xorg 7.0 may be
On 2/3/06, Igor Robul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 10:12:11PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), there
should be a noticeable difference.
AFAIK there is only one difference - 6.9 is traditianaly packaged (6 or
7
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
