On Apr 5, 2007, at 8:14 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:18:33 -0500
Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The second is that the spammer could be forging in the sender
address (envelope FROM)
MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The third type of forgery is in the header From address.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 13:18:33 -0500
Jeffrey Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The second is that the spammer could be forging in the sender
> address (envelope FROM)
>
>MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The third type of forgery is in the header From address.
Bear in mind that both of the
On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Martin McCormick wrote:
First of all, I think sendmail is great, so this is a
minor issue. The problem is that the spammers can cause local
delivery of their junk by using the name of an account on the
system.
From: Weekly News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There ar
First of all, I think sendmail is great, so this is a
minor issue. The problem is that the spammers can cause local
delivery of their junk by using the name of an account on the
system. As an example, I just received some junk that a human
being can instantly tell is bogus. It's from
li
