Hello,
I'm wondering if you guys have any general tips on how to find the
Apache process/app that is gobbling up my RAM randomly until my machine
crashes and I'm forced to reboot? I'm tired of staring at top and
working with flimsy hacks such as 10 minute Apache restart cronjobs.
This seems
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joe Auty j...@netmusician.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm wondering if you guys have any general tips on how to find the
Apache process/app that is gobbling up my RAM randomly until my machine
crashes and I'm forced to reboot? I'm tired of staring at top and
working
will be sent.
My problem is that while the apache logs are rotated as specified in
the newsyslog.conf file, the apache server is not reloaded which
causes it to write log entries to the now compressed files.
Which flag should I specify to make sure apache is reloaded during
log rotation? Thank you very
On 15 Apr 2010 at 8:30, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I have the following lines in my /etc/newsyslog.conf
/var/log/*-access.log 644 30*@T00 JCG
/var/log/*-error.log644 30*@T00 JCG
I added /var/run/httpd.pid at the end of both
added /var/run/httpd.pid at the end of both lines and will see if
that helps.
Zbigniew Szalbot
Alternatively you can use sysutils/cronolog which will eliminate the
need to restart Apache entirely. Apache's configuration file allows you
to pipe your logs to sysutils/cronolog (or any other
Apache to do a graceful restart which is less
disruptive for anyone using the web site, but it can result in a few log
records being lost during the restart. If you're going to be running a
busy website, then it's better to use rotatelogs(1) (comes with apache)
or cronolog(1) (in ports) to cycle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/03/2010 01:48:36, Rob Weissenburger wrote:
I have been picking my brain apart trying to figure this one out. Any
help is appricated.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --mandir=/usr/local/man
--enable-ssl --enable-suexec --enable-cgi
I have been picking my brain apart trying to figure this one out. Any
help is appricated.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --mandir=/usr/local/man
--enable-ssl --enable-suexec --enable-cgi --enable-rewrite --enable-so
--enable-modules=most --enable-mods-shared=max --sysconfdir=/etc
depreciated. I have the latest version of Apache
installed and I want to insure that I don't inadvertently end up with
several different versions, or an older version installed.
--
Carmel
carmel...@hotmail.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
that several older
settings were depreciated. I have the latest version of Apache
installed and I want to insure that I don't inadvertently end up with
several different versions, or an older version installed.
What kind of problem are you having? I've found that once I install
an Apache port
Toomas Aas wrote:
Do I understand the NOTE WELL section of FreeBSD-SA-09:15 correctly
that if I apply the patch then this functionality will no longer work?
Testing confims that my understanding is correct. I applied the patch and
authentication results in
Hello!
We have Apache running on FreeBSD 7.2, where among others a SSL virtual
host is defined. One particular subdirectory of this virtual host is
configured to require client certificates, using .htaccess file:
SSLVerifyClient Require
Hello!
When i use the ports to install mod_security on a fresh installed 8.0 system,
it is installing apache 2.0.63_3. Are there any known problems why 2.2 isn't
used together with mod_security?
Thx
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
2009/11/26 Alex Huth a.h...@tmr.net
Hello!
When i use the ports to install mod_security on a fresh installed 8.0
system,
it is installing apache 2.0.63_3. Are there any known problems why 2.2
isn't
used together with mod_security?
Thx
Alex
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:05:44PM +0100, Alex Huth wrote:
Hello!
When i use the ports to install mod_security on a fresh installed 8.0 system,
it is installing apache 2.0.63_3. Are there any known problems why 2.2 isn't
used together with mod_security?
Thx
I think that 2.0 is just
As far as I can tell, it doesn't even get to the certificate
verification phase even though the STARTTLS command is successful.
Is there any level of debugging that can be increased on the Apache side
? Possibly a build/compile-time option for the module?
Debugging apache code can always
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)
sekle...@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us wrote:
As far as I can tell, it doesn't even get to the certificate
verification phase even though the STARTTLS command is successful.
Is there any level of debugging that can be increased on the Apache
l install apache and svn .. and now l input http://192.168.0.100/svn/
in website . and it let me to input user name and password . and l
did not konw the username and password ,so l quit ,close the
website ... l know if l input the right ID and password there will be
a record in apache
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 05:54:12AM -0800, IT?? wrote:
l install apache and svn .. and now l input http://192.168.0.100/svn/
in website . and it let me to input user name and password . and l
did not konw the username and password ,so l quit ,close the
website ... l know if l input
2009/11/22 Roman Neuhauser neuhau...@sigpipe.cz:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 05:54:12AM -0800, IT?? wrote:
l install apache and svn .. and now l input http://192.168.0.100/svn/
in website . and it let me to input user name and password . and l
did not konw the username and password
Hello,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:54 AM, IT民工 perfectxi...@gmail.com wrote:
l install apache and svn .. and now l input http://192.168.0.100/svn/
in website . and it let me to input user name and password . and l
did not konw the username and password ,so l quit ,close the
website
Hello all,
Wasted many hours on this and am no closer to a solution. I'm trying
to get apache 2.2 on FreeBSD 7.2 to authenticate against our active
directory (Windows 2003).
The current status is that authentication works without problems when
SSL/TLS are not used. Furthermore, I can establish
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Maxim Khitrov mkhit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Wasted many hours on this and am no closer to a solution. I'm trying
to get apache 2.2 on FreeBSD 7.2 to authenticate against our active
directory (Windows 2003).
The current status is that authentication
, Konstantinos Pachnis wrote:
Hello,
I was trying to use Apache/Passenger with Ruby Enterprise Edition 1.8.7 (both
versions) on a FreeBSD 7.2 (i386 and x86_64), and Apache reports the
following error:
Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.13 OpenSSL/0.9.8e DAV/2 PHP/5.2.11 with
Suhosin-Patch
Hello,
I was trying to use Apache/Passenger with Ruby Enterprise Edition 1.8.7 (both
versions) on a FreeBSD 7.2 (i386 and x86_64), and Apache reports the following
error:
Apache/2.2.13 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.13 OpenSSL/0.9.8e DAV/2 PHP/5.2.11 with
Suhosin-Patch Phusion_Passenger/2.2.5
Monty Pyth wrote:
I have inherited a website to work on that users authenticate to
using a login and password from a login page. The server is FreeBSD
6.2 running APACHE/PHP/MYSQL. There is a MYSQL table that maintains
all of the users. The table has a users name and password. The
password
I have inherited a website to work on that users authenticate to using a login
and password from a login page. The server is FreeBSD 6.2 running
APACHE/PHP/MYSQL. There is a MYSQL table that maintains all of the users. The
table has a users name and password. The password is hashed and some
Hi,
The password is hashed and some examples are:
02SvtVJnRLzuQ
42jhVP6kxUBX6
Can anyone tell me what file I would look at to see what hash
algorithm is being used to store the passwords in the table? Any
help would be great.
As a hint, to help make it easier to reply, where are the
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Monty Pyth freebsdn...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have inherited a website to work on that users authenticate to using a
login and password from a login page. The server is FreeBSD 6.2 running
APACHE/PHP/MYSQL. There is a MYSQL table that maintains all of the users
Good day!
I have a home network consisting of two computers. Computers through a
router connected to the Internet providers. There is a static IP address
(93.81.252.152).
Now I installed FreeBSD on one of the computers.
Then I installed Apache 1.3. By command telnet localhost 80 I saw
.
Then I installed Apache 1.3. By command telnet localhost 80 I saw on the
computer screen index.html, which I created myself and placed in
DocumentRoot.
Unfortunately, the Internet browser does not display this page
http://93.81.252.152
Show you how I configure Apache?
Seems that Apache
Антон Андреевский a écrit :
Good day!
I have a home network consisting of two computers. Computers through a
router connected to the Internet providers. There is a static IP
address (93.81.252.152).
Now I installed FreeBSD on one of the computers.
Then I installed Apache 1.3. By command
FreeBSD on one of the computers.
Then I installed Apache 1.3. By command telnet localhost 80 I saw on the
computer screen index.html, which I created myself and placed in
DocumentRoot.
Unfortunately, the Internet browser does not display this page
http://93.81.252.152
Show you how I configure
Hi
Would anyone be willing to help me out of my misery - I need to solcve this
one:
Thanks in advance
David
Apache22
server does not start
httpd-error.log reads:
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:17 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate
(BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
[Wed Oct 07
Hi--
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Southwell wrote:
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:17 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
certificate
(BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:18 2009] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA
certificate
(BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
a new x.509 keypair, CSR, and signing
that with your CA cert or have a Verisign, enTrust, openca.org, etc.
Regards,
I would guess that the imap.so symbol issue is what is causing Apache to
die...
The certificate-related messages are warnings and should not make it fatal.
Markiyan
I would guess that the imap.so symbol issue is what is causing Apache to
die...
The certificate-related messages are warnings and should not make it fatal.
Markiyan.
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:11 AM, David Southwell wrote:
[Wed Oct 07 16:03:17 2009] [warn] RSA server
David Southwell writes:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit
I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) is
this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?.
Robert huff
David Southwell writes:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit
I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) is
this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?.
Robert huff
I
Robert Huff wrote:
David Southwell writes:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit
I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) is
this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?.
Easy enough to see - comment
Robert Huff wrote:
David Southwell writes:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit
I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) is
this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?.
Easy enough to see - comment
David Southwell wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
David Southwell writes:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit
I look at this and ask (knowing very little about either) is
this a problem with Apache, or a problem with PHP?.
Easy
Michael Powell wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
David Southwell writes:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/imap.so:
Undefined symbol ssl_onceonlyinit
Oh - forgot - this is what an ldd of my imap.so looks like on 7.2:
testbed# pwd
John Almberg wrote:
I'm starting to wonder about the Swap info from top... it never changes.
It has said the same thing all day, since I've been watching it. Does
that make sense?
Swap: 2008M Total, 150M Used, 1858M Free, 7% Inuse
That looks about normal if your RAM suffices. In that case
to any of your webpages
John Almberg wrote:
My Apache 2.2 instances are running about 18 Meg each. I've been
thinking about doing something to trim these down, and I think
tomorrow is the day to take action. They are getting out of hand.
I've done a bit of research on this. I
John Almberg wrote:
My Apache 2.2 instances are running about 18 Meg each. I've been
thinking about doing something to trim these down, and I think tomorrow
is the day to take action. They are getting out of hand.
I've done a bit of research on this. I think the way to get started
Ivan Voras wrote:
There is another thing you can try. Judging from the process size you've
given it looks like you are not using PHP or a similar Apache module.
Also, you didn't specify anything so I assume you are using the default
configuration, which operates in prefork mode - MPM_PREFORK
John Almberg wrote:
I am using PHP, in fact. I've listed all the loaded modules below, and
marked the ones I added with an '*'. I need the proxy modules because I
use Apache as a front end for Mongrel.
This WITH_MPM=worker sounds interesting. I'll have to read up on it. I
guess
Hi all,
The only relevance that this has to FBSD is that both Apache and
subversion were installed via packages.
I've been meaning to get around to enabling SVN so that I can access my
repo via HTTPs. However, most of the docs I've found via Sir Google
claim that it's likely that I'll have
2009/9/11 Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca
Hi all,
The only relevance that this has to FBSD is that both Apache and
subversion were installed via packages.
I've been meaning to get around to enabling SVN so that I can access my
repo via HTTPs. However, most of the docs I've found via Sir
PHP is incredibly buggy and will in all probability break Apache if you
try running it in threaded mode.
That doesn't sound so good.
As a sanity check... I've been studying these processes all morning.
When I use 'top', the column RES shows the amount of RAM used for the
process, correct
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:48 PM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
As a sanity check... I've been studying these processes all morning. When I
use 'top', the column RES shows the amount of RAM used for the process,
correct? This is the value I'd like to get down.
How many Apache
used for the process,
correct? This is the value I'd like to get down.
How many Apache processes are involved, total? Because I'm really not
sure how much success you're going to have with this. You're at 22mb
already (by comparison mine are 44mb *without* mod_php). How much
improvement
Ivan Voras wrote:
John Almberg wrote:
I am using PHP, in fact. I've listed all the loaded modules below, and
marked the ones I added with an '*'. I need the proxy modules because I
use Apache as a front end for Mongrel.
This WITH_MPM=worker sounds interesting. I'll have to read up
down.
How many Apache processes are involved, total? Because I'm really not
sure how much success you're going to have with this. You're at 22mb
already (by comparison mine are 44mb *without* mod_php). How much
improvement are you looking for? A couple of megs?
Yup... that's about what I got
Hi--
On Sep 11, 2009, at 12:42 PM, John Almberg wrote:
My basic problem is at peak usage times (usually in the afternoon),
the server starts using swap space, and then response times really
bog down.
Limit the MaxChildren to the number of Apache httpd's which your
machine can actually
the amount of RAM used for the process,
correct? This is the value I'd like to get down.
How many Apache processes are involved, total? Because I'm really not
sure how much success you're going to have with this. You're at 22mb
already (by comparison mine are 44mb *without* mod_php). How much
You've misunderstood what you've done. You have not saved a couple of
MB, you've saved one. Of the 18 MB, nearly all of it is shared memory
which is only loaded once.
Ah... Okay. That actually makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.
1GB web server is more than enough for basic www
Have given Nginx web server a try? It is small and may work better
with limited RAM.
http://www.nginx.net/
http://urloid.com/nginx1
Diego
2009/9/11 John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com:
You've misunderstood what you've done. You have not saved a couple of
MB, you've saved one. Of the 18 MB,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:20 PM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
You've misunderstood what you've done. You have not saved a couple of
MB, you've saved one. Of the 18 MB, nearly all of it is shared memory
which is only loaded once.
Ah... Okay. That actually makes sense. Thanks
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:20 PM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
I would have thought, but some times it really gets slow and I'm trying to
figure out why. When bogged down, the load averages are low. The main thing
that looks out of whack is swap space, which seems to never go below
.
Well the biggest SIZE process is mysql, followed by three mongrel
instances (for a ruby on rails app), and then a bunch of httpd processes.
Mysql is optimized for a small server, there isn't much I can do about
the size of the Rails app, so the apache instances seemed like the
logical place
John Almberg writes:
I'm starting to wonder about the Swap info from top... it never
changes. It has said the same thing all day, since I've been
watching it. Does that make sense?
The current machine has 8G, so ... porbably not a good test
case. :-)
It's predecessor
app, so the apache instances seemed like the logical
place to start.
I'm starting to wonder about the Swap info from top... it never changes.
It has said the same thing all day, since I've been watching it. Does
that make sense?
Swap: 2008M Total, 150M Used, 1858M Free, 7% Inuse
If you
My Apache 2.2 instances are running about 18 Meg each. I've been
thinking about doing something to trim these down, and I think tomorrow
is the day to take action. They are getting out of hand.
I've done a bit of research on this. I think the way to get started is
to eliminate unused modules
On Sep 10, 2009, at 7:58 PM, John Almberg wrote:
My Apache 2.2 instances are running about 18 Meg each. I've been
thinking about doing something to trim these down, and I think
tomorrow is the day to take action. They are getting out of hand.
[ ... ]
But what about the set that is left after
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:58 PM, John Almberg jalmb...@identry.com wrote:
I assume that some are critical to the basic operation of Apache. I am
hoping I can google a list of these tomorrow. Obviously these I'll have to
live with.
This is a pretty short list, and Apache won't start without
with other php websites.
I installed apache 2.2 along with php 5.2 from ports.
google says that the following lines should appear in httpd.conf
LoadModule rewrite_module libexec/apache/mod_rewrite.so
AddModule mod_rewrite.c
first line does appear, slightly modified
LoadModule
under other hosting.
The server has been working properly for over a year with other php
websites. I installed apache 2.2 along with php 5.2 from ports.
google says that the following lines should appear in httpd.conf
LoadModule rewrite_module libexec/apache/mod_rewrite.so
AddModule
out how to turn it on.
The website was working properly under other hosting.
The server has been working properly for over a year with other php
websites. I installed apache 2.2 along with php 5.2 from ports.
google says that the following lines should appear in httpd.conf
LoadModule
can't figure out how to turn it on.
The website was working properly under other hosting.
The server has been working properly for over a year with other php
websites. I installed apache 2.2 along with php 5.2 from ports.
google says that the following lines should appear in httpd.conf
about to be
hosting a php website that does use it and I can't figure out how
to turn it on. The website was working properly under other
hosting.
The server has been working properly for over a year with other
php websites. I installed apache 2.2 along with php 5.2 from
ports
See the section in the docs. Usually there are two other directives used to
configure functionality after activating it. You will usually have one, or
more, RewriteCond conditions which when evaluated run through a RewriteRule
of some kind. Brush up on your Apache regex handling
Hello.
I want to secure my Apache/PHP environment without :
- safe_mode
- suphp / suexec
So, I found this : http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/ In this page, we can see
that a FreeBSD port exists, but I can't find it. What do you thinh about
it? This tool seems to be good.
Which Apache version do you
Le Thu, 9 Jul 2009 13:18:39 +0300,
Reko Turja reko.tu...@liukuma.net a écrit :
I want to secure my Apache/PHP environment...
Full suhosin, both patch and mod for the PHP. IIRC suhosin patch is
optional in PHP port and the mod can be installed via ports.
(http://www.hardened-php.net
I want to secure my Apache/PHP environment...
Full suhosin, both patch and mod for the PHP. IIRC suhosin patch is
optional in PHP port and the mod can be installed via ports.
(http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/index.html)
Apache environment and binaries set up in a jail.
Which Apache
requests per process before it gets killed and re-launched
(usefull if a webapp leaks memory), etc
Then in your Apache config you put something like :
=
FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/cgi-bin/scar-php-wrapper.fcgi
-host 127.0.0.1:5009 -idle-timeout 1800
Location /cgi-bin
-cgi -b 127.0.0.1:5009
=
you can control how much children have to be fork(), the number of
maximum requests per process before it gets killed and re-launched
(usefull if a webapp leaks memory), etc
Then in your Apache config you put something like
memory), etc
Then in your Apache config you put something like :
=
FastCgiExternalServer /usr/local/www/apache22/cgi-bin/scar-php-wrapper.fcgi
-host 127.0.0.1:5009 -idle-timeout 1800
Location /cgi-bin/scar-php-wrapper.fcgi
SetHandler fastcgi-script
Le Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:36:11 +0200,
Julien Cigar jci...@ulb.ac.be a écrit :
When I tested php in cgi, performances were bad. That's why,
php_mod is better (in my case !=
It's not CGI, it's FastCGI.
There is no performance loss if you use an opcode cacher (like
x-cache).
And is
Just build www/apache22 with WITH_MPM=itk and you'll have it. :)
Then add something like this in each vhost:
IfModule mpm_itk_module
AssignUserId my_user my_group
/IfModule
Nicolas Letellier wrote:
Le Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:36:11 +0200,
Julien Cigar jci...@ulb.ac.be a écrit :
When I
Hi,
I'm currently using mpm-itk (on debian, but should be replaced with
freebsd soon ;-)).
I'm quite happy with the solution as it's easy to setup many user
accounts for web without ugly access right stuff and all that. apache
never made a problem after setup :-)
unfortunately I've never had
to the restrictive hardware firewall, plus the one I
saw relies on a bash shell which I don't have). Also another one looks like
a generic network bouncer -- something like netcat. However what I can't
figure out is how it is causing interference with Apache (and possibly
networking in general
ch...@darkadsl.ca ch...@darkadsl.ca writes:
I run a virtual hosting server and one of my clients got hacked (weak
password in CMS).
Since you know the machine was hacked, you can't trust *anything* on the
machine. If possible, you should rebuild it. If a jail was hacked,
replacing that jail
, plus the one I
saw relies on a bash shell which I don't have). Also another one looks like
a generic network bouncer -- something like netcat. However what I can't
figure out is how it is causing interference with Apache (and possibly
networking in general).
The processes I've seen from
on someone else to solve your traffic problems,
you can take matters into your own hands and install the Apache module
mod_throttle. mod_throttle allows you to build custom bandwidth and
connection rate policies for individual files and directories and entire
servers.
To understand why
Hello,
I've got a FreeBSD 7.2 box that i want to run web services on with
apache. I've got requirements to have protected content. Two groups of users
should be able to access it and no one else, in one group they get a certain
amound of band width, the other group gets another set amount
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Dave dave.meh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've got a FreeBSD 7.2 box that i want to run web services on with
apache. I've got requirements to have protected content. Two groups of
users
should be able to access it and no one else, in one group they get
On Monday 18 May 2009 10:55:00 Odhiambo ワシントン wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Brent Clark
brentgclarkl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hiya
I have the following in my /etc/rc.conf
mitm# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep apache
apache22_enable=YES
mitm#
The problem I seem to be experiencing
Hiya
I have the following in my /etc/rc.conf
mitm# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep apache
apache22_enable=YES
mitm#
The problem I seem to be experiencing is that if I reboot the machine,
then apache does not come up. Its only on when I run
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22 restart
that apache
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Brent Clark brentgclarkl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hiya
I have the following in my /etc/rc.conf
mitm# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep apache
apache22_enable=YES
mitm#
The problem I seem to be experiencing is that if I reboot the machine, then
apache does not come up
Somerson
billsomer...@gmail.comwrote:
how about the patch in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134227
?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Apache-won%27t-start---undefined-symbol-%22libintl_bindtextdomain%22-tp23259886p23384784.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions
Armin Pirkovitsch wrote:
Hi!
Have you tried to recompile the port from which that library came?
(pkg_info -W /usr/local/lib/libavahi-common.so.3 should help you finding
the correct port if you do not know which port that is)
Armin
On Sun 03 May 2009, Jeff Molofee wrote:
Just started
. The bindtextdomain is from gettext. If that don't
help, disable mod_dnssd and ping avahi/apache maintainers. Most users don't
need this module. It is used to advertise your http server to the local
network, just in case you have it on another port.
gnome-user-share and as such x11/gnome2 finds
Just started getting this.. can anyone tell me how to fix it?
Performing sanity check on apache22 configuration:
httpd: Syntax error on line 104 of /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_dnssd.so into server:
/usr/local/lib/libavahi-common.so.3:
Hi!
Have you tried to recompile the port from which that library came?
(pkg_info -W /usr/local/lib/libavahi-common.so.3 should help you finding
the correct port if you do not know which port that is)
Armin
On Sun 03 May 2009, Jeff Molofee wrote:
Just started getting this.. can anyone tell me
On 4/29/09 4:59 PM, Charles Howse cho...@charter.net wrote:
I recall Bill Gates saying, 640k is enough for anybody. I agree,
it's not much of a savings, and there's always the possibility that
the webmaster may add something later that needs a module that's
commented, and run around in
On 4/28/09 6:45 PM, Adam Vandemore amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here we go:
With Apache running on the development machine, modules commented as
in my first post --
CPU: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.8% interrupt, 98.1% idle
Mem: 27M Active, 139M Inact, 64M Wired, 11M Cache
On Apr 29, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
On 4/28/09 6:45 PM, Adam Vandemore amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, here we go:
With Apache running on the development machine, modules commented as
in my first post --
CPU: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.8% interrupt, 98.1%
idle
really my make your mistakes here, instead
of on the REAL web server machine.
I researched each module on the Apache site, and to the extent that I
understood, chose whether to comment them or not.
It loads without any syntax errors, and I have tested the things that
I can think of that might
201 - 300 of 2150 matches
Mail list logo