RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-30 Thread Clay
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny MacMillan > Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:49 AM > To: Clay > Cc: 'Aaron P. Martinez'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.52 help >

Re: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:33:12PM -0600, Clay wrote: > It is not a DSL Router/Modem, just a straight old school ADSL > modem. I have three static IP addresses. One is being used for the > current web server, one is on the machine I am typing this on, and > the third is being used for this s

Re: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:28:21PM -0600, Clay wrote: > I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10 and used > CVSup to download the newest port of Apache (2.0.52), did a make, > then make install everything looked like it went well. Used > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start, to start up

RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Clay
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron P. Martinez Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 11:22 PM To: Clay Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Apache 2.0.52 help --snip > > > I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10

RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Aaron P. Martinez
--snip > > > I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10 and used CVSup > to > > > download the newest port of Apache (2.0.52), did a make, then make > install > > > everything looked like it went well. Used /usr/local/sbin/apachectl > start, > > > to start up the httpd and put th

RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Clay
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron P. Martinez Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 11:04 PM To: Clay Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Apache 2.0.52 help On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 23:53, Clay wrote: > Hi, > > Yes the IP addre

RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Aaron P. Martinez
sage- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Danny MacMillan > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:49 PM > To: Clay > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.52 help > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:28:21PM -0600, Clay wrote: > >

RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Clay
would rather not wait the time needed for the entries to populate. Clay -Original Message- From: Aaron P. Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:55 PM To: Clay Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.52 help On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 23:28, Clay wrote

Re: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Aaron P. Martinez
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 23:28, Clay wrote: > Hi, > > > > Sorry about posting this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] also but that > list does not seem to get much use. > > > > I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10 and used CVSup to > download the newest port of Apache (2.0.5

RE: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Clay
MacMillan Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:49 PM To: Clay Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.0.52 help On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:28:21PM -0600, Clay wrote: > I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10 and used CVSup to > download the newest port of Apache (2.0.52), did

Re: Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:28:21PM -0600, Clay wrote: > I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10 and used CVSup to > download the newest port of Apache (2.0.52), did a make, then make install > everything looked like it went well. Used /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start, > to start up

Apache 2.0.52 help

2004-10-29 Thread Clay
Hi, Sorry about posting this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] also but that list does not seem to get much use. I just did a default install of FreeBSD 4.10 and used CVSup to download the newest port of Apache (2.0.52), did a make, then make install everything looked like it wen