Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-07 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
On 07/10/2007, at 12:56 AM, andrew clarke wrote: On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out because elf.ld.so could not

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 23:25 -0600, Old Ranger wrote: [...snip...] Want the best you can get? Use tcsh as a shell and let the linux ^^^ +1 Sincerely, -- Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED] This domain(izb.knu.ac.kr) is testing DKIM(RFC4871); flag:

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
Am Samstag 06 Oktober 2007 07:25:39 schrieb Old Ranger: BASH is not a UNIX shell. BASH occurred with Linux then carried over into FreeBSD. Get your history straight and read up on the heritage of the bash on gnu.org, please. BEFORE you start making absurd comments like these. (as if the bash

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
On 06/10/2007, at 3:25 PM, Old Ranger wrote: Hey look, BASH is not a UNIX shell. BASH occurred with Linux then carried over into FreeBSD. While it has some advantages, it is still a bastard. UNIX is written in C Want the best you can get? Use tcsh as a shell and let the linux community do

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Bill Vermillion
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:52 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said 'Who you talkin' to? You talkin' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I didn't do nuttin'. I said: Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BASH as root shell (static linking) On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread andrew clarke
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out because elf.ld.so could not be found.. I though elf was the native binary

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Mel
On Friday 05 October 2007 22:51:53 Jerahmy Pocott wrote: On 06/10/2007, at 4:59 AM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Aline de Freitas
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:56:03 andrew clarke wrote: On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out because elf.ld.so

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-06 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:55:28AM +0100, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400 Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out because elf.ld.so could not be found.. JP: Did: $ ldd /bin/bash

BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out because elf.ld.so could not be found.. I though elf was the native binary format these days? But it needs a library to run them? Is it

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread RW
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000 Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist precisely for this purpose.

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
On 06/10/2007, at 4:59 AM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out because elf.ld.so could not

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Jerahmy Pocott
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000 Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist precisely for this purpose.

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Philip Hallstrom
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000 Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist precisely for this purpose.

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread RW
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000 Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000 Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm wanting to

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread RW
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400 Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26

Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)

2007-10-05 Thread Old Ranger
RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400 Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote: On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote: On