On 07/10/2007, at 12:56 AM, andrew clarke wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a
statically linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out
because elf.ld.so could not
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 23:25 -0600, Old Ranger wrote:
[...snip...]
Want the best you can get? Use tcsh as a shell and let the linux
^^^
+1
Sincerely,
--
Byung-Hee HWANG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This domain(izb.knu.ac.kr) is testing DKIM(RFC4871); flag:
Am Samstag 06 Oktober 2007 07:25:39 schrieb Old Ranger:
BASH is not a UNIX shell.
BASH occurred with Linux then carried over into FreeBSD.
Get your history straight and read up on the heritage of the bash on gnu.org,
please. BEFORE you start making absurd comments like these. (as if the bash
On 06/10/2007, at 3:25 PM, Old Ranger wrote:
Hey look,
BASH is not a UNIX shell.
BASH occurred with Linux then carried over into FreeBSD.
While it has some advantages, it is still a bastard.
UNIX is written in C
Want the best you can get? Use tcsh as a shell and let the linux
community do
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:52
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said 'Who you talkin' to?
You talkin' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I didn't do
nuttin'. I said:
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
From: Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BASH as root shell (static linking)
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out
because elf.ld.so could not be found..
I though elf was the native binary
On Friday 05 October 2007 22:51:53 Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
On 06/10/2007, at 4:59 AM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
version then tried to log in with
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:56:03 andrew clarke wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out because elf.ld.so
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:55:28AM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out because
elf.ld.so could not be found..
JP:
Did:
$ ldd /bin/bash
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out because
elf.ld.so could not be found..
I though elf was the native binary format these days? But it needs a
library to
run them? Is it
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist
precisely for this purpose.
On 06/10/2007, at 4:59 AM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out because
elf.ld.so could not
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist
precisely for this purpose.
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist
precisely for this purpose.
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a
statically linked
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26
RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On
19 matches
Mail list logo