On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 17:28 +0100, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
Hi,
This might be a dumb question, but would like get a clear idea about
the differences between BSD make and GNU make. Why do I have to do
'gmake' in some cases instead of just plain 'make'?
What's the differences?
Thanks,
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 13:15:08 Bill Campbell wrote:
The gmake program has many extensions which tend to be used in
the gnu automake, autoconf, libtools system.
I suspect that gmake will work with most non-gnu Makefiles, but
the reverse is not true.
This suspicion is not necessarily true.
Hi,
This might be a dumb question, but would like get a clear idea about
the differences between BSD make and GNU make. Why do I have to do
'gmake' in some cases instead of just plain 'make'?
What's the differences?
Thanks,
___
On Apr 17, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
This might be a dumb question, but would like get a clear idea about
the differences between BSD make and GNU make. Why do I have to do
'gmake' in some cases instead of just plain 'make'?
Because people write more complex makefiles using syntax
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
Hi,
This might be a dumb question, but would like get a clear idea about
the differences between BSD make and GNU make. Why do I have to do
'gmake' in some cases instead of just plain 'make'?
What's the differences?
The gmake program has many
