On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 16:05:06 +, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The limitation is in NTLDR because it's M$ so is only designed for
> booting M$ OSes and the BOOTSECT file method is designed for booting DOS
> and non-NT class Windows which could only boot from the first partition
> on th
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:48:47 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless BootPart specifically know about how the freebsd boot loaders
work and how to reconize them, I doubt that it's modifying those
parameters. Now the last 66 bytes of the MBR stores the partit
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:48:47 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless BootPart specifically know about how the freebsd boot loaders
> work and how to reconize them, I doubt that it's modifying those
> parameters. Now the last 66 bytes of the MBR stores the partition table
> of the h
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:32:07PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:04:07 +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 04:10:49 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I think that you should be able to use boot0 and boot1 as a
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:04:07 +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 04:10:49 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that you should be able to use boot0 and boot1 as a file once
> > the apropriate fields are filled in. When boot0 and boot1 are
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 04:10:49 -0800, Loren M. Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that you should be able to use boot0 and boot1 as a file once
> the apropriate fields are filled in. When boot0 and boot1 are written
> to the disk in their special locations, several bytes of each file are
> mod
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:04:12AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:06:39 +, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hehe! I did it the hard way; I manually recreated the partition table -
> > 3 partitions! In fact.[roots around in drawer]..yes, still got
>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:22:48 +, Joe Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This should have said boot1, for all the reasons mentioned in the rest
> of the thread and in the handbook. Sorry,
Nah! boot1 does not work either! I've tried ... I guess it might work
if FreeBSD is on the first disk, but
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:06:39 +, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hehe! I did it the hard way; I manually recreated the partition table -
> 3 partitions! In fact.[roots around in drawer]..yes, still got
> the printout of the spreadsheet I used to calculated the start and end
> CH
Joe Kraft wrote:
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
I'm doing it with Win2k, I haven't tried it yet with XP though. And
I'll preface this, with I'm doing this from memory because I can't find
the web page they originally came from.
Shame on me for taking a stab at this one without confirming what I was
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:33:59 +, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I rewrote that section of the FAQ years ago (around FreeBSD 3.1!!)
because the previous wording was unclear and I did _exactly_ what
Rakhesh has done :-(
Ah! Glad to see I am not the only one. :))) F
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:33:59 +, Mark Ovens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rewrote that section of the FAQ years ago (around FreeBSD 3.1!!)
> because the previous wording was unclear and I did _exactly_ what
> Rakhesh has done :-(
Ah! Glad to see I am not the only one. :))) Felt really goofy wh
Loren M. Lang wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:16:25PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
Thanks for that link! I had read that part of the handbook a long time
ago, and that's how my ideas of boot0 and boot1 and etc etc had gotten
clear. Glad to see it once again -- in the context of my question! :
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:16:25PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> Thanks for that link! I had read that part of the handbook a long time
> ago, and that's how my ideas of boot0 and boot1 and etc etc had gotten
> clear. Glad to see it once again -- in the context of my question! :))
>
> So what
So that means I should install boot0 to the MBR of my second disk,
using boot0cfg with the "-o noupdate" flag, and then extract that MBR
(using "dd" for instance) to a file like c:\bootsectbsd? That should
work?
Or wait, maybe there's no need to extract. When I install boot0 to the
MBR, possibly t
Thanks for that link! I had read that part of the handbook a long time
ago, and that's how my ideas of boot0 and boot1 and etc etc had gotten
clear. Glad to see it once again -- in the context of my question! :))
So what I understand now is -- copying boot0 over to c:\bootsect.bsd
will *not* work.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:59:11AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> > No, boot0 is just a normal file that is 512 bytes long. There is
> > nothing special about it. In it is a bootloader program that can be
> > used to boot FreeBSD, and if you run it during boot, it will read the
> > partition
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
No, boot0 is just a normal file that is 512 bytes long. There is
nothing special about it. In it is a bootloader program that can be
used to boot FreeBSD, and if you run it during boot, it will read the
partition table and look for all OSes. I think it will modify the
p
> No, boot0 is just a normal file that is 512 bytes long. There is
> nothing special about it. In it is a bootloader program that can be
> used to boot FreeBSD, and if you run it during boot, it will read the
> partition table and look for all OSes. I think it will modify the
> partition table,
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:47:41 +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any issues in booting FreeBSD using NTLDR? My machine has
> Windows XP, Fedora Core 3, and FreeBSD-5.3, and while I know I can use
> GRUB to boot FreeBSD, I want to try booting it using NTLDR. Just for
> k
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 03:35:45PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
> Hi Joe!
>
> Thanks for that. I'll try that today evening from home, and see how it
> goes. :))
>
> But now here's something else. A doubt actually, based on what you
> said. I didn't mention this in my previous post -- but I ha
Hi Joe!
Thanks for that. I'll try that today evening from home, and see how it
goes. :))
But now here's something else. A doubt actually, based on what you
said. I didn't mention this in my previous post -- but I had infact
copied the "/boot/boot0" file to my WinXP partition (though I can't
recol
Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
I didnt see a copy of this mail returned to me, so am sure if it has
reached the list. Since I just subscribed, its possible something is
wrong -- and so am resending it.
Sorry for the inconv. :))
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:47:41 +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I didnt see a copy of this mail returned to me, so am sure if it has
reached the list. Since I just subscribed, its possible something is
wrong -- and so am resending it.
Sorry for the inconv. :))
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:47:41 +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are th
Hi,
Are there any issues in booting FreeBSD using NTLDR? My machine has
Windows XP, Fedora Core 3, and FreeBSD-5.3, and while I know I can use
GRUB to boot FreeBSD, I want to try booting it using NTLDR. Just for
kicks -- its something I haven't tried so far. :))
My ad0 disk has WinXP (and NTLDR),
25 matches
Mail list logo
