Is there an IDE that I can use that could stand up to Microsoft's Visual
Studio 6.0 or MetroWork's CodeWarrior?
~ Matthew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
ribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
>> end of "C++ IDE" from MET <<
--
"Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw."
-Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch"
Adam Weinberger
[EMAIL PROTECTE
There is Kylix from Borland, a conversion of it's C++ Builder IDE.
- Original Message -
From: "MET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:42 AM
Subject: C++ IDE
> Is there an IDE that I can use that could
> - Original Message -
> From: "MET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:42 AM
> Subject: C++ IDE
>
>
> > Is there an IDE that I can use that could stand up to Microsoft&#
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
--
Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
freebs
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote:
> I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
> is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
*cough* xemacs *cough*
> Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciate
On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
> *cough* xemacs *cough*
Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
> Flame away :)
Hey, you asked for it. :)
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a
touch of genius - and a lot of c
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
>
> > *cough* xemacs *cough*
>
> Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
>
> > Flame away :)
>
> Hey, you asked for it. :)
>
> Mike
Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger.
Kiffin Gish wrote:
I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what
is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users.
Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated.
What would be the best IDE can I nor anybody else on this list tell you,
i
> > > *cough* xemacs *cough*
> >
> > Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
> >
> > > Flame away :)
> >
> > Hey, you asked for it. :)
> >
> > Mike
>
> Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger.
vim, emacs + make + gcc is all you need.
--- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks
> and was wondering what
> is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE
> available for advanced users.
>
> Pros and cons etc. would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
This is
> This is obviously a trick question, because real
> programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are designed for, easy ways
to combine them to form more comp
On 08/01/06 Vladimir Tsvetkov said:
> To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit:
I believe Unix's original name was PTB, the Programmer's ToolBox. Hence why
Unix usually _is_ my IDE.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex..
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is obviously a trick question, because
> real
> > programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
>
> I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
> developer environment.
> It's a tool based environment.
> Small tools, strong cohesion in wha
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small tools, strong cohesion in
Le 08/01/2006 à 18:37:33+0100, Kiffin Gish a écrit
> On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> > On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said:
> >
> > > *cough* xemacs *cough*
> >
> > Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-)
> >
> > > Flame away :)
> >
> > Hey, you asked for it. :)
> >
>
JD Arnold wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based environment.
Small too
On 1/9/06, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to
> it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs
> learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp
> programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit,
On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>JD Arnold wrote:
>> That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax
>> highlighting, you'll at least see the differences between tabs and
>> spaces before getting into trouble due to bad whitespacing!-)
>
> you're certa
--- Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >JD Arnold wrote:
> >> That's why you should graduate to Emacs -
> with the makefile syntax
> >> highlighting, you'll at least see the
> differences between tabs and
> >> spaces bef
Chuck Robey wrote:
JD Arnold wrote:
Danial Thom wrote:
--- Vladimir Tsvetkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is obviously a trick question, because
real
programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed.
I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great
developer environment.
It's a tool based en
On 2006-01-14 13:00, JD Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chuck Robey wrote:
> > At one point in my career (in school, lisp programming) I
> > learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, there
> > isn't even a close competitor. BUT at that time, I had a
> > genius girl programmer at my
22 matches
Mail list logo
