platanthera wrote:
On Friday 14 May 2004 00:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
[ ... ]
Yes, you do. But I'm sure that you will find the make.conf(5)
manpage very informative and useful.
not really. it says
...
The /etc/make.conf file is included from the appropriate Makefile which
specifies the
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 03:03:31AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> quite confusing that uncommenting the example settings in make.conf
> changes exactly nothing, since these are the (undocumented?) system
> defaults anyway. probably a doc issue?
> - or just my stupidity .-)
Error in your expectati
On Friday 14 May 2004 00:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2004-05-13 23:29, platanthera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [/etc/make.conf]
> > ...
> > # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should
> > use # this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel
> > builds any
On 2004-05-13 23:29, platanthera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [/etc/make.conf]
> ...
> # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should use
> # this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel builds anyway).
> # There is very little to gain by using higher optimization
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 02:01:15AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> Just one last question (slightly getting OT) - are CFLAGS settings on
> FreeBSD more critical than on Linux?
> http://www.freehackers.org/gentoo/gccflags/flag_gcc3.html recommends
> -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer 'for those who don'
On Friday 14 May 2004 01:41, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:39:34AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > On Friday 14 May 2004 01:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:12:41AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > > > On Friday 14 May 2004 00:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:39:34AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 01:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:12:41AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > > On Friday 14 May 2004 00:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:29:07PM +0200, platanthera wro
On Friday 14 May 2004 01:09, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:12:41AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > On Friday 14 May 2004 00:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:29:07PM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > > > [/etc/make.conf]
> > > > ...
> > > > # To compile just th
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 01:12:41AM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 00:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:29:07PM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > > [/etc/make.conf]
> > > ...
> > > # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should
> > > use # th
On Friday 14 May 2004 00:48, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:29:07PM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> > [/etc/make.conf]
> > ...
> > # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should
> > use # this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel
> > builds anyway
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:29:07PM +0200, platanthera wrote:
> [/etc/make.conf]
> ...
> # To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should use
> # this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel builds anyway).
> # There is very little to gain by using higher optimization
[/etc/make.conf]
...
# To compile just the kernel with special optimizations, you should use
# this instead of CFLAGS (which is not applicable to kernel builds anyway).
# There is very little to gain by using higher optimization levels, and doing
# so can cause problems.
#
COPTFLAGS= [whatever]
...
12 matches
Mail list logo
