Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> Squid is such a memory hungry beast that I wouldn't worry about a small
> percentage of page faults caused by softupdates. The proxy itself is
> probably causing a hell of a lot more page faults as it maps cache files
> or as it recycles cache entries :-)
You are ver
On 2005-06-19 07:42, Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >
> > Why would you want to do that?
> >
> > Soft-updates already provides most of the benefits of an async mount
> > plus some extra goodies, like never leaving the filesystem in an
> > inconsistent st
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> Why would you want to do that?
>
> Soft-updates already provides most of the benefits of an async mount plus some
> extra goodies, like never leaving the filesystem in an inconsistent state.
Kalimera Giorgo,
For boosting io speed to the max it can get. The system is
Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I am not sure if I do something wrong here or it is suppose to work that
>way but the async option doesn't seem to work for partitions that have
>soft-updates turned on. Can someone please clarify the difference and if
>the speed difference (if any)
On 2005-06-18 23:19, Lefteris Tsintjelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if I do something wrong here or it is suppose to work that
> way but the async option doesn't seem to work for partitions that have
> soft-updates turned on.
Why would you want to do that?
Soft-updates already pro
I am not sure if I do something wrong here or it is suppose to work that
way but the async option doesn't seem to work for partitions that have
soft-updates turned on. Can someone please clarify the difference and if
the speed difference (if any) is significant when using the async option
instead o
