On 14/07/2010 00:30, Aiza wrote:
> Ed Flecko wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> I'm reading about "jails" and "chroot", and I'm not clear about the
>> differences so I'm hoping someone can clarify this for me.
>>
>> Here's what I "think" is correct:
>>
>> 1.) FreeBSD has both "chroot" capability as well as "ja
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Aiza wrote:
> Ed Flecko wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> I'm reading about "jails" and "chroot", and I'm not clear about the
>> differences so I'm hoping someone can clarify this for me.
>>
>> Here's what I "think" is correct:
>>
>> 1.) FreeBSD has both "chroot" capabilit
Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm reading about "jails" and "chroot", and I'm not clear about the
differences so I'm hoping someone can clarify this for me.
Here's what I "think" is correct:
1.) FreeBSD has both "chroot" capability as well as "jail" capability.
2.) Only FreeBSD has true, "jail" f
Hi,
> 1.) FreeBSD has both "chroot" capability as well as "jail" capability.
Yes, it has both of them. You still want to use chroot, also it is kind of
'part' of a jail (technically perhaps it's implemented separately).
> 2.) Only FreeBSD has true, "jail" functionality? Yes?...No?
In Solaris, you
Hi folks,
I'm reading about "jails" and "chroot", and I'm not clear about the
differences so I'm hoping someone can clarify this for me.
Here's what I "think" is correct:
1.) FreeBSD has both "chroot" capability as well as "jail" capability.
2.) Only FreeBSD has true, "jail" functionality? Yes?.
