On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:36 PM, n j wrote:
> openjdk-7.0.122_1
> Java Development Kit 7
> Long description : Sources : Changes : Download
>
> vs.
>
> openoffice.org-2.1.0
> Integrated wordprocessor/dbase/spreadsheet/drawing/chart/browser
> Long description | Package | Sources | Main Web Site
>
>
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:13 AM, b. f. wrote:
> Why not now? (Or anytime this past year or more?):
Hmm, good point :-).
I was misled by the ports page (e.g.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=openjdk&stype=all) which
used to have a different entry if a port had a package, i.e.:
openjdk-7
...
> I'm running Java on FreeBSD right now, but I must say I'd probably
> stick to Linux nowadays if I had any say, at least until there comes a
> day when I'll be able to "pkg_add -r openjdk7".
...
Why not now? (Or anytime this past year or more?):
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 12:19:33 -0600, n j wrote:
IMHO, building Java on FreeBSD is a pain.
AFAIK, Sun/Oracle doesn't provide precompiled OpenJDK for anyone, really.
Even OSX now has to build their own. If it's precompiled it's probably not
OpenJDK.
Regards,
Mark
___
> Java works very well for me under FreeBSD; I have not had a single
> problem with Java on FreeBSD.
> To install java, you can either install a pre-compiled JDK (called
> diablo-jdk) or compile all the JDK sources from scratch using the
> ports system. If you compile yourself from ports, you can
Thanks a lot!!
Has anyone successfully installed Coldfusion 9?
On Monday, March 7, 2011, Nerius Landys wrote:
>> Question #2: Is the JVM implementation for FreeBSD reliable and fast? Most
>> of my software components are made in Java (including HSQDB)
>
> Since I have experience with Java on Fre
> Question #2: Is the JVM implementation for FreeBSD reliable and fast? Most
> of my software components are made in Java (including HSQDB)
Since I have experience with Java on FreeBSD, I will try to answer
this question.
Java works very well for me under FreeBSD; I have not had a single
problem
The new jre or java executable.. needs the proc filesystem and or the binaries
may not be what you want. . Ftw
Rodrigo Freitas wrote:
Michael
Excuse me, I didn't quite get your answer...
On Monday, March 7, 2011, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
>
> Most .config files use the linux subsystem. . An
Michael
Excuse me, I didn't quite get your answer...
On Monday, March 7, 2011, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
>
> Most .config files use the linux subsystem. . And the jre requires the proc
> filesystem. .. you dont have to run fbsd atm
>
> Rodrigo Freitas wrote:
>
>
> Dear friends,
>
> I've been s
Most .config files use the linux subsystem. . And the jre requires the proc
filesystem. .. you dont have to run fbsd atm
Rodrigo Freitas wrote:
Dear friends,
I've been studying/researching to understand what is the best OS for my
production environment.
I didn't know FreeBSD until this need,
Dear friends,
I've been studying/researching to understand what is the best OS for my
production environment.
I didn't know FreeBSD until this need, and now I'm fascinated with the stuff
I've been reading about it.
I have 2 servers with the following SW/HW:
Server 1:
Postgres 9
HSQLDB (Java)
2 cp
11 matches
Mail list logo
