...@berklix.com
Subject: Re: compatibility SCO
In-Reply-To: 201305112344.r4bnimxd072...@fire.js.berklix.net
References: 201305112344.r4bnimxd072...@fire.js.berklix.net
On Sun, 12 May 2013 01:44:22 +0200, Julian H. Stacey
j...@berklix.com wrote:
grillo wrote:
I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime
On Thu, 9 May 2013, grillo wrote:
I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix
system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary
compatibility ? environment compatibility ?
thank you
You're probably forced to stay with MS Cobol for reasons beyond
grillo wrote:
I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for
Xenix/Unix system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have
binary compatibility ? environment compatibility ?
thank you
A long time since I looked at this, but as no one else answered yet,
hints to look
I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for
Xenix/Unix system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have
binary compatibility ? environment compatibility ?
thank you
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
2013/5/9 grillo gri...@goldnet.it
I need use Microsoft Cobol Compiler and runtime developed for Xenix/Unix
system V SCO using NETBSD or FreeBSD, it is possible? have binary
compatibility ? environment compatibility ?
thank you
__**_
freebsd
Not to bug people, but is there support for sdxc in any version of FBSD?
(9.x would be nice :) )
I understand it is mostly in the fs (exfat), and as such there is a fuse
module for it, but I'm concerned at a hardware/driver level- namely speeds.
Any light on what happens when one uses a fs other
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert Bonomi
Sent: 24 August 2012 03:30
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: harware compatibility queustion
I need to add more than two' internal SATA _ports_
I need to add more than two' internal SATA _ports_ to a box that will be
running FreeBSD 9.
When I look at inexpensive SATA controllers, they all seem to be using
chipsets thar are _not_ explicitly mentioned in the 'supported hardware'
list.
Can anyone say, authoritatively, that, say, a
In the last episode (Aug 23), Robert Bonomi said:
I need to add more than two' internal SATA _ports_ to a box that will be
running FreeBSD 9.
When I look at inexpensive SATA controllers, they all seem to be using
chipsets thar are _not_ explicitly mentioned in the 'supported hardware'
list.
Hello,
I need to order a few more servers for an internal project, and instead
of the usual DL360G7 we now use without any problem with FreeBSD, there
would now be the next generation, called Gen8.
Intel® C600 Series Chipset
Intel® E5-2600 Processor Family
Storage Controller : HP Smart Array
Reply inline...
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Olivier Mueller om-lists-...@omx.ch wrote:
Hello,
I need to order a few more servers for an internal project, and instead
of the usual DL360G7 we now use without any problem with FreeBSD, there
would now be the next generation, called Gen8.
Hello !
I have a Samsung portable with an Intel Atom cpu N450 . In
http://www.freebsd.org/fr/where.html , you specify “versions platform “ and I
cannot locate the type of processor of my Samsung .What choice do I do ?
Thank you very much for the answer
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Philippe Combier wrote:
Hello !
I have a Samsung portable with an Intel Atom cpu N450 . In
http://www.freebsd.org/fr/where.html , you specify ?versions platform ? and I
cannot locate the type of processor of my Samsung .What choice do I do ?
Thank you very much for
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri May 25 10:25:21 2012
From: Philippe Combier phxant...@wanadoo.fr
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:22:52 +0200
Cc:
Subject: compatibility
Hello !
I have a Samsung portable with an Intel Atom cpu N450 . In http
Greetings,
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible
network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes
with most PC's?
THx
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Greetings,
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible
network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes
with most PC's?
THx
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Christian ROUSSEAU christ...@comphaiti.com writes:
Greetings,
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible
network cards.
You have my permission. *grin*
See : http:/www.freebsd.org/releases/
Fint the O/S version you are interested in and select the
On 17/05/2012 16:11, Christian ROUSSEAU wrote:
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible
network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes
with most PC's?
Realtek cards generally use the re(4) driver:
selection?
You would do better to post a list of the cards available to you and ask
what will work. I have purchased many very inexpensive ($10) NICs and
never had a compatibility problem with whatever was the latest FreeBSD
version available at the time, although very expensive cards, and very new
I would like to have a list of the free bsd compatible
network cards . Is it compatible with realtek chipset drivers. That comes
with most PC's?
i think making list of incompatible network cards would be far easier.
since a very long time i just never checked as everything
Hi Guys,
my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card
is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into
boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1
regards,
Dave Whytcross
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
David Whytcross writes:
my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card
is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into
boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1
Have you asked the port maintainer?
Robert Huff
enhanced and CUDA compatibility
David Whytcross writes:
my FreeBSD 9.0 machine is fitted with an NVIDIA GEForce 210 card
is it possible to utilize its CUDA GPU operability into
boinc_setiathome_enhanced 6.12_1
Have you asked the port maintainer?
Robert Huff
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:10 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
The most annoying for me was when they're running Win7 (blah!) and I
was trying to burn a cd _and_ keep the kids from interrupting by
playing on the keyboard. I closed the lid like I do with FBSD and it
suspended! Grr!
That behavior is
On 02/23/12 08:33, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:10 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
The most annoying for me was when they're running Win7 (blah!) and I
was trying to burn a cd _and_ keep the kids from interrupting by
playing on the keyboard. I closed the lid like I do with FBSD and it
On 02/23/12 11:57, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/23/12 08:33, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:10 +1000
Da Rock articulated:
The most annoying for me was when they're running Win7 (blah!) and I
was trying to burn a cd _and_ keep the kids from interrupting by
playing on the keyboard. I closed the
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:45:05 +1000, Da Rock wrote:
To the OP, check the pages Polytropon has linked here, but the chances
of getting exactly that are nil to impossible. I've run about 6 or more
laptops now without too much trouble. The biggest problems were
wireless, but that was the bad
Dear Information service
I was thinking of purchasing a new laptop and I wanted to go for FreeBSD
OS. Unfortunately I'm no brainer in Unix so I'd like to find a PC that can
run FreeBSD 9.0 out of the box.
Could you either tell me which hardware are suitable or a link to a
compatibility list
to check is to take a LiveCD to the store and ask if you can boot
the laptop that you'd like from that.
Could you either tell me which hardware are suitable or a link to a
compatibility list?
GIYF: http://laptop.bsdgroup.de/freebsd/
Roland
--
R.F.Smith http
or a link to a
compatibility list?
Check the hardware compatibility list to find out which
devices are compatible to FreeBSD, also see the release
notes regarding version 9.0 of the OS.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/hardware.html
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/hardware.html
It's
tell me which hardware are suitable or a link to a
compatibility list?
Check the hardware compatibility list to find out which
devices are compatible to FreeBSD, also see the release
notes regarding version 9.0 of the OS.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/hardware.html
http
Hello,
I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the. Brandelf was
applied to the binaries. But any Linux application crashes at startup.
freebsd-desk# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 21 0xc040 8c6d08 kernel
21 0xc0cc7000 4864 sem.ko
31
On 02/13/12 20:08, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the. Brandelf was
applied to the binaries. But any Linux application crashes at startup.
freebsd-desk# kldstat
Id Refs AddressSize Name
1 21 0xc040 8c6d08 kernel
2
On 13 Feb 2012 at 21:01, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/13/12 20:08, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the.
Brandelf was applied to the binaries. But any Linux application
crashes at startup.
freebsd-desk# kldstat
Id Refs Address
On 13/02/2012 12:22, Dave wrote:
On 13 Feb 2012 at 21:01, Da Rock wrote:
On 02/13/12 20:08, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to get Linux running various applications to the.
Brandelf was applied to the binaries. But any Linux application
crashes at startup.
freebsd-desk#
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:47:07 + Matthew Seaman wrote:
The undefined symbol errors suggest that the OP is missing some
important linux shlibs which should be installed in
/compat/linux/usr/lib -- what linuxbase port have you installed, and
what distro did you obtain those linux
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:22:15 - Dave wrote:
Don't you have to install/load a module for Linux binary compatability to
work in F'BSD? I seem to remember that being mentioned during a recent
8.something install.
I have load the kernel module with boot.
freebsd-desk# cat
On 2/13/2012 11:52 AM, sie...@email.de wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:22:15 - Dave wrote:
Don't you have to install/load a module for Linux binary compatability to
work in F'BSD? I seem to remember that being mentioned during a recent
8.something install.
I have load the kernel
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, vijayamurugan.kalyanasunda...@emc.com wrote:
Hi Team,
Kindly let me know on the compatibility of Intel X520 Dual Port 10
Gigabit Ethernet PCIe Adaptor Card with Free BSD 8.2 OS.
I didn't see any answer to this - but we are interested in ANY 10
GB ethernet card
On 29 Dec 2011, at 15:45, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, vijayamurugan.kalyanasunda...@emc.com wrote:
Hi Team,
Kindly let me know on the compatibility of Intel X520 Dual Port 10 Gigabit
Ethernet PCIe Adaptor Card with Free BSD 8.2 OS.
I didn't see any answer
Hi Team,
Kindly let me know on the compatibility of Intel X520 Dual Port 10 Gigabit
Ethernet PCIe Adaptor Card with Free BSD 8.2 OS.
This is an urgent requirement for our development project. Please provide us
the information at the earliest.
Thanks Regards,
Vijay K
Extn : 785-4581
Hi List
I need to run a linux binary on freebsd 7.3 that expects to link to
libpam.so.0. I can't seem to find how to compile libpam (linux-pam) on freebsd,
or locate some kind of compatible binary I can run on freebsd with linux binary
compatibility enabled in the ports tree either.
Would
compatibility enabled in the ports tree either.
Would anyone know if there is a freebsd port of linux libpam, or a
source package I could easily compile for freebsd 7.3 and upward ?
Informational: The binary I'm trying to run is wmic , a windows
management instrumentation client
Hi Boris
(apologies for top-posting)
Thanks, I had to go this way in the end. My process was:
1. enable linux binary compatibility on freebsd.
2. build a debian chroot environment using debootstrap
3. obtain some binaries that I could not find in the debian package repos by
extracting
In article 20110331112119.ga21...@sh4-5.1blu.de you write:
Hello,
Hi!
We have started a small documentation project in the FreeBSD Wiki: The
FreeBSD' Webcam and DVB Compatibility List.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat
The main goal of this page is to give an exact answer about which
Hello,
We have started a small documentation project in the FreeBSD Wiki: The
FreeBSD' Webcam and DVB Compatibility List.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat
The main goal of this page is to give an exact answer about which
application works with a given cam or DVB. Combinations
Da Rock wrote:
...
I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx.
anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first.
Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659
I looked up man socket and I can see possibilities (in my mind
On 01/31/11 20:22, b. f. wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
...
I've been chasing the answer to a FreeBSD version of this (approx.
anyway), but I needed to find out what exactly PF_PACKET was first.
Finally found this answer here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4659
I looked up man socket and I
In recent versions of the Linux kernel (post-2.0 releases) a new
protocol family has been introduced, named PF_PACKET. This family allows
an application to send and receive packets dealing directly with the
network card driver, thus avoiding the usual protocol stack-handling
(e.g., IP/TCP or
'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/__init__.pyo'
usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/__init__.pyc: Can't create
'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/__init__.pyc'
usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.py: Can't create
'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.py'
: Can't create
'usr/local/lib/python2.6/distutils/tests/support.pyc'
[snip]
Does anyone know why this might be happening?
Are there compatibility changes with cpio?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pico
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Many thanks for the responses!
On 01/10/2010 02:52, Paul Wootton wrote:
On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk
will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp
Hi,
I'm planning on using FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE edition for a small
primary/secondary DNS server setup.
The system will run Bind9 and have some zone files and views for the few
people I host for.
I am considering using a dual Atom system board with 2GB RAM and for
storage was thinking
On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use
compact flash as storage??
For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these
days) systems with CF images off of flash, keep a shadow copy of /etc
around, and
Thanks very much Brian:
On 30/09/2010 17:02, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use
compact flash as storage??
For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these
days)
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk
will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get
written to all the time.
You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will
have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written
to all the time.
You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like Brian
mentioned for other high write
MFS == memory filesystem; aka ram-disk. The problem being that on reboot,
MFS looses all its contents, therefore practices like storing the 'startup'
state for a filesystem in an archive (tar file works well) and
mounting/copying on startup works well. Conversely, if you need to modify
that
On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote:
Kaya Saman wrote:
From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk
will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get
written to all the time.
You can skip swap altogether
information
about what terminal output size is currently set in X?
Oh, and the program will be written in C. Due to maximum compatibility,
I want to try to keep the program in text mode (so it's easier to use
it via SSH with no X server present); in any other case, I would
surely default to Tcl/Tk
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Polytropon wrote:
Is there a way to easily determine the terminal output size at
program startup so the program can be preconfigured for certain
screen sizes, and even refuse to run if it's less than 80x25?
The curses library will do this. The variables LINES and COLS
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:44:27 -0300 (ADT), A. Wright and...@qemg.org wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Polytropon wrote:
Is there a way to easily determine the terminal output size at
program startup so the program can be preconfigured for certain
screen sizes, and even refuse to run if it's
In the last episode (Jul 23), Polytropon said:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:44:27 -0300 (ADT), A. Wright and...@qemg.org wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Polytropon wrote:
Is there a way to easily determine the terminal output size at program
startup so the program can be preconfigured for
Yes--
On Jul 23, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Polytropon wrote:
Cool - I planned to use (n)curses anyway. But one question remains:
Is there an interrupt line (or something functionally similar,
a flag or whatever) that will give the chance for a notification
if LINES or COLS has recently changed, e.
Chuck, Dan, Andrew,
this is exactly what I was looking for. The manpages of resozeterm
and the mentioning of KEY_RESIZE in getch()'s input queue gives a
good solution to call a specific function when in any input loop.
The needed information about the new screen dimensions can then
easily be
failures that were replaced with very little hassle from Dell. The most
trouble they will give you is if it's an obscure issue, in which case
they'll ask you to boot Linux and run their DSET tool.
If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems.
If you want general compatibility
and run their DSET
tool.
If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems.
If you want general compatibility that generally works better than
any OEM, use general parts from newegg, etc. iXsystems is the
exception because they test and support BSD on the parts they sell
.
If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems.
If you want general compatibility that generally works better than
any OEM, use general parts from newegg, etc. iXsystems is the
exception because they test and support BSD on the parts they sell.
iXsystems products look very solid. We've
Hi,
I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it
(http/samba/ 4 disk on RAID)
It's summer time and the old workstation will not work at the end the
summer time (too warm for it)
So ii wish to change it.
I don't need a big server, a tiny workstation will be enough.
I
or an OEM for support
issues, including hardware replacements because they didn't sell the
machine with BSD.
If you want a company that supports BSD, use iXsystems.
If you want general compatibility that generally works better than any
OEM, use general parts from newegg, etc. iXsystems
Olivier GARNIER wrote:
Hi,
I've got an old workstation wich i use to have FreeBSD server on it
(http/samba/ 4 disk on RAID)
It's summer time and the old workstation will not work at the end the
summer time (too warm for it)
So ii wish to change it.
I don't need a big server, a tiny
can I please be directed to any on-line reference as the
procedures involved in executing a Debian binary on FreeBSD 8?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:44:36 -0700, Jim Pazarena fqu...@paz.bz wrote:
can I please be directed to any on-line reference as the
procedures involved in executing a Debian binary on FreeBSD 8?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/linuxemu.html
Basically see 10.2 (next page).
--
Jim Pazarena wrote:
can I please be directed to any on-line reference as the
procedures involved in executing a Debian binary on FreeBSD 8?
Thanks!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/linuxemu.html
HTH,
KDK
___
Hi,
I'd just like to know if the Intel DG45FC Fly Creek LGA 775 Mini-ITX
system board is compatible with FreeBSD and also if there is a PCIe SATA
card recommendation too as I need more SATA ports??
I plan on building a Mini-ITX based NAS/Server using a Chenbro hot-swap
chassis with FreeBSD
Hello all,
I have a quick question about server hardware compatibility. We're looking to
buy a replacement server and the HP ProLiant DL320 G6 E5502 was listed as a
possible option.
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF06b/15351-15351-3328412-241644-241475-3929672-3942218-3942219.html
I just ran across an article that states that through the
International Disk Drive Equipment and Materials Association (Idema)
all hard drive makers have committed to adopting the 4K advanced format
by the end of January 2011.
Later in the article:
Windows 7, Vista, OS X Tiger, Leopard, Snow
Hi, thanks for replying
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Somehow your linux.ko is broken, do you perhaps have WITHOUT_LINUX=
in /etc/src.conf or /etc/make.conf?
I have no src.conf
make.conf looks like this:
$ cat /etc/make.conf | less
CPUTYPE?=athlon64
(FreeBSD), statically linked, for FreeBSD 7.0 (700055), stripped
and then remembered I'd stripped out the compatibility 4 5 6 and 7 from
the kernel. So put them back in, recompiled and now everything works.
Sorry for the noise.
--
John - comp dot john at googlemail dot com
OpenBSD firewall
-10_2 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10.
Finally, if I try to install compatibility in the kernel, I get the error
unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
at the config phase.
Can anyone help me please?
# uname -p -r
8.0-RELEASE-p2 amd64
The system
:
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
# make
=== linux_base-f10-10_2 linuxulator is not (kld)loaded.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10.
Finally, if I try to install compatibility in the kernel, I get the error
unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
at the config phase
.4 not found, required by
pipetype
So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've
looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what I'm
looking for (probably looking right at it).
What am I missing?
Thanks!
--
John Lind
j...@starfire.mn.org
: Shared object libc.so.4 not found, required by
pipetype
So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've
looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what I'm
looking for (probably looking right at it).
What am I missing?
Thanks!
misc/compat4x
system, I get
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.4 not found, required by
pipetype
So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've
looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what I'm
looking for (probably looking right at it).
It's in ports, misc
try to run a program compiled on the FreeBSD 4.3 system on
the new system, I get
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.4 not found, required by
pipetype
So - there must be some compatibility libraries somewhere. I've
looked in Packages and in Distributions, and didn't see what
Dears,
Does anyone know or already configured the linux compatibility in FreeBSD to
install rpm packages and so on.
Actually I'm running the i386 7.2 FreeBSD and the following package.
%pkg_info |grep linu
linux_base-fc-4_14 Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for
i386/amd64)
I already
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:57:58 -0300 Leandro F Silva wrote:
Does anyone know or already configured the linux compatibility in FreeBSD to
install rpm packages and so on.
hm, actually (almost) all linux applications are installed using
RPM packages. Did you mean using linux RPM database
Hi,
I would like to build a FreeBSD 7.2 server on the motherboard Asus
KFSN5-D.
It looks like the chipset is nVIDIA nForce Professional 3600, I don't
see it being supported (or not).
Before I engage in buying, I would like to make sure I'll have no
problem.
TIA,
Olivier
Hi, Just use portmaster to upgrade ports and found out a lot of linux-*
ports are renewed. But strange to see that upgrading was interrupted by
ports conflicts, such as linux-f8-tiff and linux-tiff. What I have are a
whole bunch of f8 stuff, I dont understand why portmaster choose to upgrade
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:15:21 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Hi, Just use portmaster to upgrade ports and found out a lot of linux-*
ports are renewed. But strange to see that upgrading was interrupted by
ports conflicts, such as linux-f8-tiff and linux-tiff.
Yes, those ports install files with
Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 Accessibility
Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fedora 8)
linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14_1 Vector graphics library Cairo (Linux Fedora 8)
linux-f8-curl-7.18.2_1 The command line tool for transferring files with URL
synta
linux-f8-expat-2.0.1_1
It's funny, sometimes I think portmaster knows that it should upgrade
linux-f8* ports and not linux-* ports but sometimes doesn't. I don't know
why...
TFC
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Tsu-Fan Cheng tfch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1 Accessibility
Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary (Linux Fedora 8)
linux-f8-cairo-1.4.14_1 Vector graphics library Cairo (Linux Fedora 8)
linux-f8-curl-7.18.2_1 The command line tool
I see, can you tell me which are FC4 ports?? thanks!!
TFC
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Thank you, Boris. This is my linux ports,linux-f8-atk-1.20.0_1
Accessibility
Toolkit, Linux/i386 binary
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:34:44 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
I see, can you tell me which are FC4 ports?? thanks!!
Please, reread my previous email. I wrote _all_ linux ports.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:15:42 -0400 Tsu-Fan Cheng
something I wonder about
I know OpenBSD and FreeBSD both have different versions of the UFS
filesystems
(FreeBSD newfs(8) -O option, OpenBSD newfs(8) -O)
has someone tried to use all combinations of all options to see if they
work?
It's funny that OpenBSD's manpage says it uses FFS, not UFS
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:11:28 -0600, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
It's funny that OpenBSD's manpage says it uses FFS, not UFS -- when even I
thought it said UFS before I looked it up.
Don't FFS and UFS refer to the same file system, the
Berkeley Fast File System, also known as 4.2bsd? In
my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just put a OpenBSD partition on a EIDE disk I had laying around. I'd had some
advice (apparently bad) that the OpenBSD UFS filesystem could provide a
filesystem that I could access from FreeBSD ... least, just now when I tried to
mount either of
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:36:31 -0400, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
Is there ANY filesystem that would be a good bet, so that I could transfer
stuff
to from FreeBSD to OpenBSD? Besides (obviously) UFS?
Yes, there is, and it even isn't a file system.
It's tar. You can easily create a
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:36:31 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just put a OpenBSD partition on a EIDE disk I had laying around. I'd had
some
advice (apparently bad) that the OpenBSD UFS filesystem could provide a
filesystem that
1 - 100 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
