On Sunday 07 June 2009 13:42:36 Dave wrote:
> I'm trying to get dhcp and dns going ddns on FreeBSD 7.2. In my
> dhcpd.leases file i see the forward and reverse information given on the
> lease. A host fqdn and a host IP address both return correct dns
> information on this
Dave wrote:
I'm trying to get dhcp and dns going ddns on FreeBSD 7.2. In my
dhcpd.leases file i see the forward and reverse information given on the
lease. A host fqdn and a host IP address both return correct dns information
on this host. My issue is if i check the forward and re
I've had a BIND/DHCP dynamic dns solution, but it was very frustrating
to get it all working together. Security/ACL/various DHCP clients not
requesting a DNS update, blah blah blah.
If you've never used dnsmasq, look it up. It simplifies the DHCP, DNS
and dynamic DNS functioning
Hello,
I'm trying to get dhcp and dns going ddns on FreeBSD 7.2. In my
dhcpd.leases file i see the forward and reverse information given on the
lease. A host fqdn and a host IP address both return correct dns information
on this host. My issue is if i check the forward and reverse
Replies interspersed
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:15 -0400, David Banning wrote:
> I have had my dns server working fine in the past but now it seems
> to be down and I can't locate the reason.
>
> Here are some details;
>
> # dig @127.0.0.1 mylocaldomain.com
Is this a
As it turns out - following a new installation, named.conf is
in /var/named/etc/namedb with a symlink from /etc/namedb.
To keep all my original DNS records and settings
I had restored a backup to /etc/namedb which destroyed the
symlink - as a result when I altered /etc/namedb/named.conf
named
I have had my dns server working fine in the past but now it seems
to be down and I can't locate the reason.
Here are some details;
# dig @127.0.0.1 mylocaldomain.com
works, but
# dig @ns1.3s1.com mylocaldomain.com
does not.
I have all IP addresses listed in named.conf;
list
o get to 10.1.1.1 the old ip and gets
>> time to live exceeded fro an ip along the route. When i try to ping
>> domain.com it gets all ok as it pings the new ip. I've also tried dig
>> @(forwarders in named.conf) and they to got the correct mx dns entry for
>> domain.
in named.conf) and they to got the correct mx dns entry for
domain.com.
In rc.conf i have hostname="mail.domain.com" (eg), i haven't changed
it, i'm thinking it's something related to hostid or hostuid but i don't
know where to search for this topic.
pings the new ip.
> Disregard my noise. It was a file called hosts in /etc, changed there
> the ip for mail.domain.com and now ping works ok.
> Sorry about that.
As a rule, only use /etc/hosts for hosts that cannot be resolved by DNS (i.e.:
local network) or NFS hosts that provide cri
e also tried dig
> @(forwarders in named.conf) and they to got the correct mx dns entry for
> domain.com.
> In rc.conf i have hostname="mail.domain.com" (eg), i haven't changed
> it, i'm thinking it's something related to hostid or hostuid but i don'
ever when i try:
"ping mail.domain.com" it tries to get to 10.1.1.1 the old ip and gets
time to live exceeded fro an ip along the route. When i try to ping
domain.com it gets all ok as it pings the new ip. I've also tried dig
@(forwarders in named.conf) and they to got the corre
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, George Davidovich wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:32:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> > Recently we've had a Mac notebook of some sort on our LAN, that likes
> > to make these DNS queries from time to time, to no avail, as noticed
> > on a fi
Ian Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> recently we've had a Mac notebook of some sort on our LAN, that likes to
> make these DNS queries from time to time, to no avail, as noticed on a
> filtering bridge between the LAN and the router+DNS at 192.168.0.1:
>
> 16:13:05
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:32:47PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> Recently we've had a Mac notebook of some sort on our LAN, that likes
> to make these DNS queries from time to time, to no avail, as noticed
> on a filtering bridge between the LAN and the router+DNS at
> 192.16
Hi,
recently we've had a Mac notebook of some sort on our LAN, that likes to
make these DNS queries from time to time, to no avail, as noticed on a
filtering bridge between the LAN and the router+DNS at 192.168.0.1:
16:13:05.020397 192.168.0.59.53207 > 192.168.0.1.53: 63162+ PTR?
b
or maybe since you installed from an image (not over a network) the
resolv.conf was never created.
heres how i create it, never tried this freebsd though:
seq --format="nameserver 4.2.2.%g" 1 5 > /etc/resolv.conf
alternatively just adding this line:
nameserver 4.2.2.1
or what
The named.conf is used only if you need to set up your owm DNS server and
you do not use someone other then the default.
To resolve external hosts you need to enter the dns server IP in the
/etc/resolv.conf file. It is not resolvE.conf.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Hi,
The name of file is
/etc/resolv.conf
not
/etc/resolve.con
Peter
Fouz Azeem wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD
> I have install FreeBSD 7.1 from .iso I need to configure DNS
> I can find the named.conf but I did not find resolve.conf in /etc/
> Can you please tell me where it i
Fouz Azeem wrote:
Dear FreeBSD
I have install FreeBSD 7.1 from .iso I need to configure DNS
I can find the named.conf but I did not find resolve.conf in /etc/
Can you please tell me where it is?
Probably either nowhere or under a different name, depending on how you
look at things, as
Dear FreeBSD
I have install FreeBSD 7.1 from .iso I need to configure DNS
I can find the named.conf but I did not find resolve.conf in /etc/
Can you please tell me where it is?
Fouz
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 03:09:54 David Naylor wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 February 2009 09:33:36 Mel wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 February 2009 22:55:56 David Naylor wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My ISP is using a WinGate DNS but resolving host names often takes a
&
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 09:33:36 Mel wrote:
> On Thursday 05 February 2009 22:55:56 David Naylor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My ISP is using a WinGate DNS but resolving host names often takes a long
> > time. The problem is also present in Konqueror (3 & 4)
On Thursday 05 February 2009 22:55:56 David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My ISP is using a WinGate DNS but resolving host names often takes a long
> time. The problem is also present in Konqueror (3 & 4) and Firefox.
>
> An example:
> # time host google.co.za
> google.co.
On Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:30:58 +0300 Dmitry wrote:
> Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English. My problem: I am have 3G/EDGE
> modem ZTE MF622+ and FreeBSD 7.1. In using KPPP (KDE 3.5.10) my modem
> can't connect to EDGE provider, because in KPPP not enabled option
> Aut
On Saturday 07 February 2009 18:58:40 you wrote:
> David Naylor wrote:
> >> Can you see problems of your wireless card in /var/log/messages?
> >
> > I do get some errors, here is a sample:
> > # grep ndis0 /var/log/messages
> > Feb 7 17:57:55 dgserver kernel: arp: 192.168.0.2 is on rl0 but got rep
David Naylor wrote:
Can you see problems of your wireless card in /var/log/messages?
I do get some errors, here is a sample:
# grep ndis0 /var/log/messages
Feb 7 17:57:55 dgserver kernel: arp: 192.168.0.2 is on rl0 but got reply from
00:02:6f:3e:8a:ed on ndis0
Feb 7 18:03:25 dgserver ke
Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English, i am beginning FreeBSD user from
Russia..___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freeb
On Saturday 07 February 2009 17:34:02 Lokadamus wrote:
> David Naylor wrote:
> > On Friday 06 February 2009 13:47:47 Lokadamus wrote:
> >> David Naylor wrote:
> >>> I don't quite understand your question. See below for the network
> >>> topology:
&g
David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 06 February 2009 13:47:47 Lokadamus wrote:
David Naylor wrote:
I don't quite understand your question. See below for the network
topology:
ISP (host WinGate DNS, only proxy and socks connections allowed out)
| Wireless connection to my gateway
S
Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English. My problem: I am have 3G/EDGE modem ZTE
MF622+ and FreeBSD 7.1. In using KPPP (KDE 3.5.10) my modem can't connect to
EDGE provider, because in KPPP not enabled option Auto DNS setting. If manually
set this option, that says tech support of provider,
Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English, i am beginning FreeBSD user from
Russia..___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freeb
On Friday 06 February 2009 13:47:47 Lokadamus wrote:
> David Naylor wrote:
> > I don't quite understand your question. See below for the network
> > topology:
> >
> > ISP (host WinGate DNS, only proxy and socks connections allowed out)
> >
> > | Wire
David Naylor wrote:
I don't quite understand your question. See below for the network topology:
ISP (host WinGate DNS, only proxy and socks connections allowed out)
|
| Wireless connection to my gateway
|
Server (My gateway, running bind9 for internet domain and DNS caching, FreeBSD
> > SYN_SENT
> >
> > Firefox on Windows doesn't have this problem.
>
> it doesn't look like DNS problem as it's stuck on connecting to HTTP port
> (80).
>
>
> check out with ping if it's all fine with your netcard under FreeBSD
netcard
Hi,
I have similar problem, 3 servers in the same switch, the same
configuration, but sending of e-mail from php takes very long time,
but only on 2 servers with 7.1 amd64. On 6.2 (the same ip range,
the same dns resolver, the same version of php, the same switch) no
problem.
Where
On Friday 06 February 2009 10:37:00 Lokadamus wrote:
> David Naylor wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My ISP is using a WinGate DNS but resolving host names often takes a long
> > time. The problem is also present in Konqueror (3 & 4) and Firefox.
> >
> > Lastly:
look like DNS problem as it's stuck on connecting to HTTP port
(80).
check out with ping if it's all fine with your netcard under FreeBSD
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ques
David Naylor wrote:
Hi,
My ISP is using a WinGate DNS but resolving host names often takes a long
time. The problem is also present in Konqueror (3 & 4) and Firefox.
Lastly:
# cat /etc/resolve.conf
nameserver 192.193.194.1
What is wrong, why is DN resolving taking such an abnormally
Hi,
My ISP is using a WinGate DNS but resolving host names often takes a long
time. The problem is also present in Konqueror (3 & 4) and Firefox.
An example:
# time host google.co.za
google.co.za has address 66.249.93.104
google.co.za has address 72.14.207.104
google.co.za has add
2009/1/30 Chris Rees :
> 2009/1/29 Jon Radel :
>>
>> Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
>> if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
>> the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
&g
2009/1/29 Jon Radel :
>
> Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
> if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
> the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
>
> dig +trace amnesiac.com
>
> should start
2009/1/29 Jon Radel :
>
> Too much sanitation makes it hard to figure out your problem. However,
> if that amnesiac. is actually amnesiac.com this probably relates to
> the fact that DNS for amnesiac.com is horribly broken.
>
> dig +trace amnesiac.com
>
> should start
Chris Rees said:
> For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
> and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
> failure, but what does it mean?
>
>
> Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=<***
Chris Rees wrote:
> For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
> and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
> failure, but what does it mean?
>
>
> Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=<***
For about four days now, I've had these emails stuck in my mailqueue,
and I don't understand what the problem is. Sure it says it has a DNS
failure, but what does it mean?
Jan 29 16:03:19 amnesiac sm-mta[38492]: n0RM2Hlj021695: to=<**>,
ctladdr= (80/80), delay=1+18:01:02,
cs.cmi.ua.ac.be, skipping
Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: bad exports lists line /home hmacs.cmi.ua.a
c.be
When adding a line 143.129.75.10 hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be in /etc/hosts
(via vi) this messages disappears. I can use NFS.
But why is this needed?
I can use DNS names for any other host (ssh-in
I have set up a FreeBSD box as a router; works great.
The router (machine B) is a DHCP client to another box (Machine A)
that provides it with its IP address and its DNS server address.
When I hook up a new box (Machine C) to Machine B, I provide it with
Machine B's private IP address a
[dropping -questions as a Cc]
Gary Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:23:55AM +0700, Outback Dingo wrote:
>> i have space on a freebsd system in the states, i could do secondary for
>> anybody, and we could create a new service, with a web based management
>> facility
have space on a freebsd system in the states, i could do secondary for
> >> anybody, and we could create a new service, with a web based management
> >> facility
> >> its plainly a dns backup for us and a backup secondary failover web site
> for
> >> ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:15:33 -0800
"pete wright" wrote:
[...]
> > There was a thread on this just the other day here. Not sure if
> > they are BSD-based, but both dyndns.org and zoneedit.com offser
> > secondary service for practically nothing
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Matt Emmerton wrote:
>> Everyone:
>>
>> We just got word that Neustar, which bought DNS service provider
>> Nominum a few years ago, is shutting down Nominum's
>> "secondary.com" service. The service used to provide s
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:23:55AM +0700, Outback Dingo wrote:
> i have space on a freebsd system in the states, i could do secondary for
> anybody, and we could create a new service, with a web based management
> facility
> its plainly a dns backup for us and a backup secondary failo
Everyone:
We just got word that Neustar, which bought DNS service provider
Nominum a few years ago, is shutting down Nominum's
"secondary.com" service. The service used to provide secondary DNS
for users' zones at no charge.
I and the other secondary.com users I know think
i have space on a freebsd system in the states, i could do secondary for
anybody, and we could create a new service, with a web based management
facility
its plainly a dns backup for us and a backup secondary failover web site for
extremely low traffic, if you guys want to picth in, we can bring
Everyone:
We just got word that Neustar, which bought DNS service provider
Nominum a few years ago, is shutting down Nominum's
"secondary.com" service. The service used to provide secondary DNS
for users' zones at no charge.
I and the other secondary.com users I know t
Hesiod is interesting, but the Wikipedia article suggests its used for
small local networks. I'm thinking of globally DNS-casting data.
is IS ok to do this.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
On 12/17/08, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Kelly Jones wrote:
>> Has anyone tried publishing non-DNS information via DNS? Advantages:
>>
>> % Automatic distributed caching on various nameservers.
>>
>> % UDP, so no TCP overhead
>>
>> I know SPF uses thi
DAve(dave.l...@pixelhammer.com)@2008.12.17 10:13:09 -0500:
> Kelly Jones wrote:
>> Has anyone tried publishing non-DNS information via DNS? Advantages:
>>
>> % Automatic distributed caching on various nameservers.
>>
>> % UDP, so no TCP overhead
>>
>&g
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 19:07 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > Someone needs to invent and promote a TextualDatagramPublicationProtocol or
> > TDPP because DNS has been abused for publishing non DNS data for too long.
> > Continuing to use DNS for things it was never intend
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Someone needs to invent and promote a
TextualDatagramPublicationProtocol or TDPP because DNS has been abused
for publishing non DNS data for too long. Continuing to use DNS for
things it was never intended to do will only cloud the issue and delay
implementation when
Someone needs to invent and promote a TextualDatagramPublicationProtocol or
TDPP because DNS has been abused for publishing non DNS data for too long.
Continuing to use DNS for things it was never intended to do will only cloud
the issue and delay implementation when the internet decides to
Kelly Jones wrote:
Has anyone tried publishing non-DNS information via DNS? Advantages:
% Automatic distributed caching on various nameservers.
% UDP, so no TCP overhead
I know SPF uses this, and clamav publishes their current version
number this way, but has anyone done this on a large
Kelly Jones wrote:
Has anyone tried publishing non-DNS information via DNS? Advantages:
% Automatic distributed caching on various nameservers.
% UDP, so no TCP overhead
I know SPF uses this, and clamav publishes their current version
number this way, but has anyone done this on a large
% UDP, so no TCP overhead
I know SPF uses this, and clamav publishes their current version
number this way, but has anyone done this on a large scale basis?
no idea what "large scale" is, but it WILL work if done properly. on any
scale.
___
freebsd
Has anyone tried publishing non-DNS information via DNS? Advantages:
% Automatic distributed caching on various nameservers.
% UDP, so no TCP overhead
I know SPF uses this, and clamav publishes their current version
number this way, but has anyone done this on a large scale basis?
--
We&#x
connected as a dhcp server at 192.168.0.2
which apparently has external address ww.xx.yy.zz. I am using a fixed
ip address ie
192.168.0.6
I have this in my rc.conf
defaultrouter="192.168.0.2"
hostname="int.myoffice.com"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.0.6 netmask 255.255.255
.0.6
>
> I have this in my rc.conf
>
> defaultrouter="192.168.0.2"
> hostname="int.myoffice.com"
> ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.0.6 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>
>
> and have dns mapping int.myoffice.com --> ww.xx.yy.zz, but our ISP w
at 192.168.0.2
which apparently has external address ww.xx.yy.zz. I am using a
fixed ip address ie
192.168.0.6
I have this in my rc.conf
defaultrouter="192.168.0.2"
hostname="int.myoffice.com"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.0.6 netmask 255.255.255.0"
and hav
ww.xx.yy.zz. I am using a fixed ip address ie
192.168.0.6
I have this in my rc.conf
defaultrouter="192.168.0.2"
hostname="int.myoffice.com"
ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.0.6 netmask 255.255.255.0"
and have dns mapping int.myoffice.com --> ww.xx.yy.zz, but o
Andrew Falanga wrote:
> ...
> While diagnosing this, I connect to the server (using Putty) from a
> machine in PN1, using either a mail client or telnet I'm unable to make
> a connection to the mail server over port 25. Using tcpdump during this
> putty session I do not even see the SYN packets fo
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Clients in the churches private network cannot send mail using this
server, though they can receive mail from it (POP). The church has a
private network, PN1, and the mail server sits at a church members house
because he has a static IP address; let's call that PN2. The
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It doesn't take a rocket scientist, or a computer scientist, to
figure out we've got DNS issues.
What exactly is the problem though? What problems are you having on
the mail server that lead you to the
George Davidovich wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:28:28PM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working with
George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most, if not all,
of my problems are related to DNS and how we&#x
Patrick Mahan wrote:
Andrew Falanga presented these words - circa 9/6/08 6:28 PM->
Hi,
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working
with George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that
most, if not all, of my problems are related to DNS and how we
Andrew Falanga presented these words - circa 9/6/08 6:28 PM->
Hi,
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working with
George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most, if not all,
of my problems are related to DNS and how we've got it im
a domain name pointer 34-252.72-24-cpe.cableone.net.
So something's changed in the last 12 hours, although I can't
say exactly what. AFAIK, my DNS boxen and I were communicating
Just Fine(tm) last night as well as this afternoon.
Regardless of the fact that I got a response and you did
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 19:28:28 -0600
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working
> with George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that
> most, if not all, of my problems are related to
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:28:28PM -0600, Andrew Falanga wrote:
>
> Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working with
> George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most, if not all,
> of my problems are related to DNS and how we've
--On September 6, 2008 7:28:28 PM -0600 Andrew Falanga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working
with George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most,
if not all, of my problems are related to DNS and how we&
Andrew Falanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't take a rocket scientist, or a computer scientist, to
> figure out we've got DNS issues.
What exactly is the problem though? What problems are you having on
the mail server that lead you to the above conclusion?
--
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working with
George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most, if not all,
of my problems are related to DNS and how we've got it improperly configured.
First, a crude drawing of ho
Hi,
Well, my clients at church are still having issues and after working with
George, a respondant to my original questions, I think that most, if not all,
of my problems are related to DNS and how we've got it improperly configured.
First, a crude drawing of how our mail server exists i
Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to Lars I have come up with the following (to upgrade BIND for
the DNS caching issue)...(short of updateing all source).
Download the latest port BIND95.9.5.x (p2 I think),
9.5.0.2 -- correct.
Extract it to the ports directory,
make -DWITH_REPLACE_BASE
Hi all,
Thanks to Lars I have come up with the following (to upgrade BIND for the
DNS caching issue)...(short of updateing all source).
Download the latest port BIND95.9.5.x (p2 I think),
Extract it to the ports directory,
make -DWITH_REPLACE_BASE
make install
make clean
Is the above
rttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
will hopefully now give a result that includes the word GREAT.
Lars
- Original Message - From: "Lars Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gpeel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:
-
From: "Lars Kristiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "gpeel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: BIND DNS Patching on 6.1, 6.2
gpeel skrev:
I was thinking I would try the BIND959.5.0 port, but i
gpeel skrev:
I was thinking I would try the BIND959.5.0 port, but it apprears that this
version is still vulneralbe.
The port dns/bind95 is patched:
$ named -version
BIND 9.5.0-P2
Easily installed with the option WITH_REPLACE_BASE.
Regards,
Lars
.3 or
> 7.x
>
> But right now I just dont have time.
>
> I was wondering if anyone has tried the patches BIND DNS Poioning
> listed on the freebsd homepage (security advisories) on 6.1 and/or
> 6.2 and if they worked OK.
>
> -Grant
> _
Hi all,
I have ten webservers that I would like nothing more than to update to 6.3 or
7.x
But right now I just dont have time.
I was wondering if anyone has tried the patches BIND DNS Poioning listed on
the freebsd homepage (security advisories) on 6.1 and/or 6.2 and if they
worked OK
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Zamri Besar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... tools to manage a big deployment of dns and dhcp services?
>
>
What do you mean by "big"? Or, how big is "big".
--
regards,
dg
"..but the more you use clever tricks, the l
Good morning,
When network are keep growing over time, network services such as dns and
dhcp are playing an important function to any network
administrators/engineers, which for a single downtime, it will cause a chaos
to end users. By having redundancy/fail-over/etc services and proper plans
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
>> requests. I've just done a 7.0 i
Jim presented these words - circa 7/21/08 6:30 PM->
I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why).
I have a machine with t
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:30:56 -0400, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
> requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
> but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know
I'm trying to get a machine working, but it can't seem to handle DNS
requests. I've just done a 7.0 install (from CD, usually I use net,
but it wasn't connecting to anything, now I know why).
I have a machine with two built in NICs on the motheroboard, one using
nfe the oth
Hi list,
I finally managed to establish a PPTP VPN connection to my employer
using mpd5. My problem now is that in order for the setup to work
properly I need to supersede search domain and dns'es in
"/etc/resolv.conf" either by hand or by editing "dhclient.conf". If I
use "dhclient.conf"
--On Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:05:11 -0500 Joshua Frugé
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning
bind ports:
dns/bin9
dns/bind94
dns/bind95
All of these were updated last night to include the UDP port
randomization stuff in the latest security patch. (There's not much
point in installing dns/bind9 though, as that's a downgrade to bind9.3
from the system supplied bind-9.4.2
I just joined the list (but did search the archive), so I apologize in
advance if this was already answered and I missed it.
What's the process to update the base bind in freebsd for the new
cacheing poisoning vuln that seems to be all the rage lately?
I'm running freebsd 7.0-RELEASE-p2 and I am
301 - 400 of 1459 matches
Mail list logo
