On Friday, November 19, 2010 07:25:10 pm Gary Gatten wrote:
> I ran into a similar situation where the ns was behind a Juniper SRX doing
> NAT. Said Juniper had a "smart" DNS piece (ALG) that does special stuff on
> DNS packets; max record length, special NAT, etc. I had to disable the
> DNS ALG t
Sent: Fri Nov 19 18:50:33 2010
Subject: DNS Resolution
I have a weird DNS problem I am hoping someone can help me with.
I have server running FBSD 8.0. /etc/resolv.conf is set to use my ISP's DNS
servers for name resolution.
If run dig @ns3.socket.net .yyy. the INTERNAL ip address of the
I have a weird DNS problem I am hoping someone can help me with.
I have server running FBSD 8.0. /etc/resolv.conf is set to use my ISP's DNS
servers for name resolution.
If run dig @ns3.socket.net .yyy. the INTERNAL ip address of the server
is returned.
If I run d...@ns3.socket.net
Thanks to all for their help. I was ignoring the forward DNS, and
many things don't resolve reverse DNS unless there's a matching
forward DNS.
duh.
thanks!
Eric Crist
On Oct 23, 2007, at 12:00 PMOct 23, 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
As I already stated, if I do a host
Eric F Crist wrote:
> As I already stated, if I do a host 172.30.x.x, I get a the correct
> reverse resolution. dig works as well. What isn't working is the
> reverse resolution in certain command outputs, etc.
Note that the DNS tools (host, nslookup, dig) use their
own resolver code, not
> As I already stated, if I do a host 172.30.x.x, I get a the correct
> reverse resolution. dig works as well. What isn't working is the
> reverse resolution in certain command outputs, etc. Maybe there is
> something missing here:
Install wireshark on one of the clients -- filter on protocol dn
At 07:23 AM 10/23/2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:51 PMOct 22, 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite
On Oct 22, 2007, at 4:51 PMOct 22, 2007, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Eric F Crist wrote:
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite some time now, but I'm having a prob
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
>Hey folks,
>
>We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
>(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
>for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
>172.30.x
Eric F Crist wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
> (private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
> for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
> 172.30.x network to work.
&g
At 12:02 PM 10/22/2007, Eric F Crist wrote:
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
172.30.x network to work.
Typing
Hey folks,
We're trying to get reverse DNS resolution for a block of IPs
(private). We've had the 10.x network working great at the office
for quite some time now, but I'm having a problem getting the
172.30.x network to work.
Typing 'host ' returns a valid re
Hi,
I'm getting a nasty problem with Gnome 2.6 on 4.10-RELEASE. Any apps
with a GTK2 UI (evolution, firefox) are having real issues doing DNS
lookups. They time out regularly. Nslookup on the same hosts is
instant.
Anyone seen this or know how to fix it?
Thanks all,
- Chris.
___
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 13:04 US/Pacific, Peter Schoenmaker wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:54:57PM -0600, Charles Pelletier wrote:
are you absolutely sure your DNS info is correct? need current
information:
what is your service provider?
verio
what are the DNS numbers you are current
type slave;
file "s/0.168.192.in-addr.arpa.bak";
masters {
192.168.1.1;
};
};
*/
>
>
> Charles Pelletier
> Tech. Coordinator
> St Luke's School
> Irving, TX
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
onday, November 11, 2002 2:38 PM
To: Miroslav Pendev
Cc: freebsd-questions
Subject: Re: dns resolution problems
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:28:41PM -0500, Miroslav Pendev wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> > I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd.
>
> It looks to me as the D
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 02:28:41PM -0500, Miroslav Pendev wrote:
> Hi Peter
>
> > I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd.
>
> It looks to me as the DNS servers in your /etc/resolv.conf
> are not working well...
I have used multiple different name servers and have used the same
name s
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 11:28:27AM -0800, Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 11:12 US/Pacific, Peter Schoenmaker wrote:
>
> >I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd. Specificly i have
> >problems resolving hosts @ united airlines. These include www.ual.com,
> >www.un
Peter Schoenmaker wrote:
I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd. Specificly i have
problems resolving hosts @ united airlines. These include www.ual.com,
www.united.com, www.ua2go.com, www.itn.net. Some of them use different
dns servers but they still have the problem. I have tried
Hi Peter
> I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd.
It looks to me as the DNS servers in your /etc/resolv.conf
are not working well...
> Specificly i have
> problems resolving hosts @ united airlines. These include www.ual.com,
> www.united.com, www.ua2go.com, www.itn.net. Some of t
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 11:12 US/Pacific, Peter Schoenmaker wrote:
I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd. Specificly i have
problems resolving hosts @ united airlines. These include www.ual.com,
www.united.com, www.ua2go.com, www.itn.net. Some of them use different
dns servers
I am having problems resolving hosts with freebsd. Specificly i have
problems resolving hosts @ united airlines. These include www.ual.com,
www.united.com, www.ua2go.com, www.itn.net. Some of them use different
dns servers but they still have the problem. I have tried to look into
the problem b
22 matches
Mail list logo
