Re: Detail in section 25.2.3.3 of the Handbook

2013-01-29 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >> Maybe it's intentional but in section >> >> 25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade >> >> The step that says: >> >> portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb >> >> Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb witho

Re: Detail in section 25.2.3.3 of the Handbook

2013-01-29 Thread Warren Block
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote: Maybe it's intentional but in section 25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade The step that says: portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18? Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb That's a good poin

Detail in section 25.2.3.3 of the Handbook

2013-01-29 Thread Alejandro Imass
Maybe it's intentional but in section 25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade The step that says: portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18? Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb Thanks, -- Alejandro Imass _