On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's intentional but in section
>>
>> 25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
>>
>> The step that says:
>>
>> portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
>>
>> Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb witho
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Alejandro Imass wrote:
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
That's a good poin
Maybe it's intentional but in section
25.2.3.3 Rebuilding Ports After a Major Version Upgrade
The step that says:
portupgrade -f ruby18-bdb
Shouldn't it be ruby-bdb without the 18?
Is there a reason why it has to be ruby18-bdb
Thanks,
--
Alejandro Imass
_