Re: Doug Richardson is (probably) back online

2005-03-22 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:45:10 -0700, Ben Goren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005 Mar 21, at 4:47 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: In reading any document, one should never undoubtedly believe everything it says. :-) I don't believe you. I told ya! :-) P.S. I had a multiple-choice test

Re: Doug Richardson is (probably) back online

2005-03-21 Thread Ben Goren
On 2005 Mar 20, at 10:59 PM, Siju George wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:39:13 -0700, Ben Goren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.bartleby.com/141/ Thankyou so much for the link Ben :)) You're welcome. If English isn't your native language, it's worth noting that a (*very* little) bit of

Re: Doug Richardson is (probably) back online

2005-03-21 Thread Siju George
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:42:51 -0700, Ben Goren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005 Mar 20, at 10:59 PM, Siju George wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:39:13 -0700, Ben Goren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.bartleby.com/141/ Thankyou so much for the link Ben :)) You're welcome.

Doug Richardson is (probably) back online

2005-03-20 Thread Ben Goren
Folks, I just sent a note to Mr. Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it doesn't seem to have bounced. First, if anybody really did mailbomb him (as the Anonymous Coward at 68.165.27.173 claims on the OpenBSD Journal), please do us all a favor and turn yourself in to the FBI. To the rest, I would

Re: Doug Richardson is (probably) back online

2005-03-20 Thread Siju George
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:39:13 -0700, Ben Goren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, Don't think that you should silence yourselves, but do brush up on your Strunk (http://www.bartleby.com/141/). It'll make your writing more effective and perhaps make Mr. Richardson's job easier. Thankyou so much