In response to "Jeff Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is a stock kernel config the 'fast' way to go on these CPUs?
>
> Sure wish there was an 'options I_WANNA_GO_FAST' or an 'options
> RICKY_BOBBY' that would just do all the right things.
>
> Still not sure which scheduler to go with..
Unless s
Is a stock kernel config the 'fast' way to go on these CPUs?
Sure wish there was an 'options I_WANNA_GO_FAST' or an 'options
RICKY_BOBBY' that would just do all the right things.
Still not sure which scheduler to go with..
On 11/14/06, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/15/06,
On 11/15/06, Jeff Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought that since we both had HTT tags in the CPU ID, that we had it.
Yeah, well... that's a funny thing that tag. Got it on my
first-generation 1.3GHz Pentium 4 as well. Makes me wonder if Intel
had that feature in the processors very earl
I thought that since we both had HTT tags in the CPU ID, that we had it.
;)
On 11/14/06, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/15/06, Jeff Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My dmesg matches yours Juha..
>
> Would enabling Hyperthreading increase any of my processing power?
Well, i
On 2006/11/14 15:13, Jeff Mohler seems to have typed:
> My dmesg matches yours Juha..
>
> Would enabling Hyperthreading increase any of my processing power?
It depends on load and so forth, most reports I saw vary from a
minimal increase to a large decrease. The first few links from a
google s
On 11/15/06, Jeff Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My dmesg matches yours Juha..
Would enabling Hyperthreading increase any of my processing power?
Well, if you have the D830, no, because it doesn't have HTT support. :)
As a general question, the answer is yes and no. Depends on your
applica
My dmesg matches yours Juha..
Would enabling Hyperthreading increase any of my processing power?
On 11/14/06, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/15/06, Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like my hyperthreading is enabled and it is in the BIOS. I was
> told there
On 11/15/06, Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks like my hyperthreading is enabled and it is in the BIOS. I was
told there was a dual-core in the machine, but not confirmed. But there
should be two with HT anyway as seen, correct?
This is a dmesg from an Intel D830 box:
CPU: Ge
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 15:04 -0800, Josh Carroll wrote:
> > up in the 'C' column of top after I've rebooted with the newly compiled
> > kernel.
>
> Run top with the -S argument. You should then see two "idle"
> processes, one for each CPU:
>
>11 root 1 171 52 0K 8K CPU0 0
up in the 'C' column of top after I've rebooted with the newly compiled
kernel.
Run top with the -S argument. You should then see two "idle"
processes, one for each CPU:
11 root 1 171 52 0K 8K CPU0 0 72.1H 91.70% idle: cpu0
10 root 1 171 52 0K 8K RUN
In response to Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a server with 6.1 and one dual-core processor and the SMP option
> was built in the kernel according to the doc below, but only zeros show
> up in the 'C' column of top after I've rebooted with the newly compiled
> kernel.
>
> http:
I have a server with 6.1 and one dual-core processor and the SMP option
was built in the kernel according to the doc below, but only zeros show
up in the 'C' column of top after I've rebooted with the newly compiled
kernel.
http://www.freebsddiary.org/smp.php
I did not add APIC_IO as the doc sug
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 18:57 -0800, Justin Franks wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to know if FreeBSD 6.0 supports dual-core CPU chips.
Yes
> Note, dual-core is different from dual CPU.
> On Jun. 13, 2005 PT Wired magazine explained a dual-core CPU as the following
> in a article titled "The New C
Hello,
I would like to know if FreeBSD 6.0 supports dual-core CPU chips. Note,
dual-core is different from dual CPU.
On Jun. 13, 2005 PT Wired magazine explained a dual-core CPU as the following in a
article titled "The New Chips on the Block"
"A dual-core processor differs from a single-core ch
14 matches
Mail list logo