Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-03 Thread andi payn
Notice that everyone praising Evolution or Kmail used their mailer of choice to compose the message in question, but: Harald Schmalzbauer: User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Well, even this incredible slow thunderbird was better than evolution IMHO. Scratch one vote for Thunderbird (leaving 0).

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-03 Thread Chris Howells
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Monday 03 November 2003 05:42, C. Ulrich wrote: hated having to wait and wait for the ENTIRE KDE SUBSYSTEM to start up Entire KDE subsystem is somewhat misleading. kdeinit will be launched which will want to run kbuildsycoca to check for

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-03 Thread Chris Howells
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Monday 03 November 2003 04:54, Chris wrote: I too opted for Kmail. Does what I need it to do, filters, uses encryption - I wish tho it had the calendaring that Outlook has. You'll probably like Kontact then, version 0.8 of which will be

Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
like gnome-panel, gnome-desktop, ..., please? is there any way to use evolution without gnome-desktop installed (i googled a bit but havnt found any useful information yet) ? thx seb ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
desktop (!) can anyone explain me why evolution depends on things like gnome-panel, gnome-desktop, ..., please? Well, it's a Outlook clone so perhaps it has to be as bloated ;-) SCNR is there any way to use evolution without gnome-desktop installed (i googled a bit but havnt found any useful

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
evolution without gnome-desktop installed (i googled a bit but havnt found any useful information yet) ? Of course. Just launch it under another desktop. Joe thx seb ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
with -DWITHOUT_PILOT to remove that dependency. is there any way to use evolution without gnome-desktop installed ( ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I don't think so! googled a bit but havnt found any useful information yet) ? Of course. Just launch

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
on gnomepilot2 which depends on gnomepanel. You can build Evo with -DWITHOUT_PILOT to remove that dependency. is there any way to use evolution without gnome-desktop installed ( ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I don't think so! Of course

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
can build Evo with -DWITHOUT_PILOT to remove that dependency. is there any way to use evolution without gnome-desktop installed ( ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I don't think so! Of course there is. Read what I wrote previously

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
that dependency. is there any way to use evolution without gnome-desktop installed ( ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ I don't think so! Of course there is. Read what I wrote previously. The GNOME Desktop itself consists of the actual

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: hi, so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use evolution right ? thats bad :( ... i wonder if all these dependencies are really necessary ... Everything Evo

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:26, sebastian ssmoller wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: hi, so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use evolution right ? thats bad :( ... i wonder if all these

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:25, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:26, sebastian ssmoller wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 20:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:06, sebastian ssmoller wrote: hi, so i have to install a lot of gnome stuff to be able to use

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote sebastian ssmoller thusly... so to be more precise: $ cd /usr/ports/mail/evolution $ make pretty-print-build-depends-list This port requires package(s) ORBit2-2.8.2 XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Monday 03 November 2003 00:21, parv wrote: in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote sebastian ssmoller thusly... *SNIP* Would it be too doggedly of me to suggest to use mutt instead? I mean just look at it... # cd /usr3/ports/mail/mutt # make pretty-print-build-depends-list This port

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread andi payn
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 15:50, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Well, even this incredible slow thunderbird was better than evolution IMHO. I have a pretty complicated setup--multiple identities, even more IMAP mailboxes, mailing lists that I want to filter into separate folders and auto-purge, a Palm

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread C. Ulrich
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 18:50, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: (I love pine and kmail for GUI) I used to use kmail quite a while back and loved it. I eventually quit using it and went to Mozilla mail because I ran the GNOME desktop and hated having to wait and wait for the ENTIRE KDE SUBSYSTEM to start

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Chris
On Sunday 02 November 2003 11:42 pm, C. Ulrich wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 18:50, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: (I love pine and kmail for GUI) I used to use kmail quite a while back and loved it. I eventually quit using it and went to Mozilla mail because I ran the GNOME desktop and hated

Re: Evolution without gnome

2003-11-02 Thread Frank Knobbe
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 22:54, Chris wrote: Evolution is slick. I loved it - but the fact remains that it is bloated and runs horrid if you happen to save messages, and they are in the k's. The secret to get Evolution to run decent is to use the maildir format instead of mbox for all message