Fibre Channel disks to two Systems?

2005-09-09 Thread Danny Howard
[NOTE: If posting followup, please mind the cross-post to -questions and -scsi.] Hello, We host our PostgreSQL database on FreeBSD. Until now, we have just built the beefiest DB server we can spec, and then dump the data every thirty minutes to a backup DB server, so if the primary DB ser

Re: Fibre Channel disks to two Systems?

2005-09-09 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 09), Danny Howard said: > As I understand it, I can have an FC loop with one or more drives, > connected to two servers, and either server can talk to one or the > other drives exclusively. My QUESTION is: how is the arbitration > done in FreeBSD? You run camcontrol on ei

Re: Fibre Channel disks to two Systems?

2005-09-10 Thread Danny Braniss
hi danny you are asking too many questions :-), but w/r to netapp: same computer, 1gbE, NFS is about 50% slower than FC. btw, iSCSI (still beta) is only slightly faster than NFS (note NFS is UDP, iSCSI is TCP). as to reliability, the netapp is worth avery penny (actualy K$ :-), had only o

Re: Fibre Channel disks to two Systems?

2005-09-11 Thread Dean Strik
Danny Braniss wrote: > hi danny > you are asking too many questions :-), but w/r to netapp: > same computer, 1gbE, NFS is about 50% slower than FC. > btw, iSCSI (still beta) is only slightly faster than NFS > (note NFS is UDP, iSCSI is TCP). Of course NFS can be TCP as well. And must be TCP

Re: Fibre Channel disks to two Systems?

2005-09-11 Thread Jonathan Fosburgh
On Friday 09 September 2005 01:59 pm, Danny Howard wrote: > > >From my research, I am thus far most impressed with the SANbloc 2Gb, > > which holds fourteen FC drives in a 3U rackmount. It can be had with > redundant RAID controllers, or as a JBOD. There are similar products > from other vendors