On Mon, April 5, 2010 7:04 pm, Aiza wrote:
> The ports make file tree is so very large now a days (21491 ports).
> Doing portsnap to download the complete ports system just to install 3
> ports is massive over kill. I have been doing package installs because
> the resources consumed in disk space (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2010 02:04:16, Aiza wrote:
> The ports make file tree is so very large now a days (21491 ports).
> Doing portsnap to download the complete ports system just to install 3
> ports is massive over kill. I have been doing package installs because
The ports make file tree is so very large now a days (21491 ports).
Doing portsnap to download the complete ports system just to install 3
ports is massive over kill. I have been doing package installs because
the resources consumed in disk space (inodes used) and no compile time
is such a time