Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:13:43AM +, RW wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote: > > > On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread RW
On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote: > > On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it?

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > > > The general consensus is you should not touch

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote: > On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > > >The general consensus is you should not touc

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread perikillo
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > y

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread RW
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? > > The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless > you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding is

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread John Smith
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and may

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and maybe take active maintainership of it. You can try it just for

FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread John Smith
Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? I would like to hear from somone who tested both on FreeBSD 6.2 B to RC1 Thank you, -J ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio