On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:13:43AM +, RW wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote:
> > > On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it?
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
> >
> > The general consensus is you should not touch
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote:
> On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
> >
> >The general consensus is you should not touc
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
>
> The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
> y
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
>
> The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
> you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding is
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and
may
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and
maybe take active maintainership of it.
You can try it just for
Hello,
What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
I would like to hear from somone who tested both on FreeBSD 6.2 B to RC1
Thank you,
-J
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
10 matches
Mail list logo