RE: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Rick Nekus
Huh ? Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:49:40 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0 Thanks Dan. That answered my question. I'm really happy to replace Solaris with FreeBSD. All I have to do is import my zfs pool

Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Mihai Donțu
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Rick Nekus wrote: Huh ? Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:49:40 -0800 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0 Thanks Dan. That answered my question. I'm really happy to replace Solaris

Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Preston Hagar
, but it still shouldn't bring down the whole system. (Paid) Sun support had no answer. We also tested ZFS on a FreeBSD 7.0 beta, run bonnie++ with a test file size larger then RAM, this too will eat up all available memory and bring down the system. Obviously this could be a bonnie issue, but still due

Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Wojciech Puchar
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: will replace all other FS's -ya all others!!! how sure you are? I would second this. Just as a fun test, setup a test machine with hotswap drives in a RAID 10 zfspool. Add a hot spare for good ZFS looks for me like

Re: Using ZFS on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-27 Thread Norman Maurer
Am Donnerstag, den 28.02.2008, 07:52 +0100 schrieb Wojciech Puchar: On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: will replace all other FS's -ya all others!!! how sure you are? I would second this. Just as a fun test, setup a test machine with hotswap

Upgrading from FreeBSD 6.2 to FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-20 Thread Hansa
Hi, On a test system, I'm trying to upgrade FreeBSD 6.2 to 7.0 using the instructions from Ralf Engelschall. http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/upgrade/freebsd-upgrade-6x-7x.txt I'm stuck at compiling the new kernel. Here are the steps I took: - install backward compatibility files

Re: Upgrading from FreeBSD 6.2 to FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-20 Thread Oliver Fromme
Crossposting to -current and -questions is usually not a good idea. This question belongs to -questions only. Hansa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a test system, I'm trying to upgrade FreeBSD 6.2 to 7.0 using the instructions from Ralf Engelschall.

Re: Upgrading from FreeBSD 6.2 to FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:10 AM 2/20/2008, Hansa wrote: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/TESTRABIT: unknown option IPSEC_ESP *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. kernel build duration: 00:00:00 STUCK My guess is that the ipsec (crypto?) source code is missing? Is this correct? If

Re: Lockup on Boot due to ACPI (Freebsd 7.0-RC2 i386)

2008-02-16 Thread Jason Morgan
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:49:20AM -0500, Jason Morgan wrote: I just upgraded a system from 6.3-RELEASE to 7.0-RC2 (both i386) only to discover that the system won't boot with ACPI enabled. ACPI was working fine in 6.3. The problems occur at boot-up -- the system simply stops loading at

MIDI with snd_cmi.ko in FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE

2008-02-14 Thread Mario Lobo
Hi; I know this has been asked here before but all the answers I could find referred to older freebsd versions. I have a pcm0: CMedia CMI8738 port 0xac00-0xacff irq 19 at device 5.0 and it has a midi interface (which is fully functional). When I had 6.2, MIDI was working fine. I had

MIDI with snd_cmi.ko in FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE

2008-02-11 Thread Mario Lobo
Hi; I know this has been asked here before but all the answers I could find referred to older freebsd versions. I have a pcm0: CMedia CMI8738 port 0xac00-0xacff irq 19 at device 5.0 and it has a midi interface (which is fully functional). When I had 6.2, MIDI was working fine. I had

SAMBA 3 weirdness on a FreeBSD 7.0-PRE box

2008-02-11 Thread O. Hartmann
Hello, running a SAMBA 3 server as PDC for a bunch of Windows Clients I run into the following problem: sometimes the smbd daemon signalls SIG 11 and dies, dumping a lot of this stuff to the console: 8666p0i d1 18]: === ==6==8 661018 = ==6==( mb1d1)8,= ===6= u id 1108:== ==6== e

Lockup on Boot due to ACPI (Freebsd 7.0-RC2 i386)

2008-02-10 Thread Jason Morgan
disabled) is `verbose' and I have edited it to show where the lockup happens. I am more than willing to help out with any debugging if needed. I just need some direction. Thanks, ~Jason # uname -a FreeBSD penelope.skepsi.net 7.0-RC2 FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 #1: Sat Feb 9 23:35:18 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: tmpfs on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
Aline de Freitas wrote: Em Thursday 07 February 2008 11:57:26 Wojciech Puchar escreveu: just to make sure - is it included in FreeBSD 7.0 ? Yes, it is can it be used in production. I'm running it in my workstation, and it looks pretty good... There are some issues but it works for most

Re: tmpfs on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-07 Thread Aline de Freitas
Em Thursday 07 February 2008 11:57:26 Wojciech Puchar escreveu: just to make sure - is it included in FreeBSD 7.0 ? Yes, it is can it be used in production. I'm running it in my workstation, and it looks pretty good... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/home/aline]$ cat /etc/fstab | grep tmpfs tmpfs

tmpfs on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-07 Thread Wojciech Puchar
just to make sure - is it included in FreeBSD 7.0 ? can it be used in production. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: tmpfs on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
Necati Demir wrote: There are some issues but it works for most people. What kind of issues? I get an infinite loop when executing certain linux binaries from a tmpfs, and there might still be a panic condition. Kris ___

Re: tmpfs on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-02-07 Thread Necati Demir
There are some issues but it works for most people. What kind of issues? -- Necati Demir http://demir.web.tr ndemir [~] demir.web.tr necati83 [~] gmail.com -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

missing ttyv5 in freebsd 7.0 rc-1

2008-02-04 Thread todd
loaded free bsd 7.0 rc1 and often wont boot with all terminal e boots then when i hit alt F1, 2,3,4,5,6,7 all but one will come up sometimes its ttyv5 sometimes missing ttyv2 other times (rarely) all 6 will hit like nothing is wrong ? problem ? thanks todd

missing ttyv5 in freebsd 7.0 rc-1

2008-02-04 Thread tttttooooodddd ddddddvnek
loaded free bsd 7.0 rc1 and noticed on re-boots seems to be missing 1 ttyv* terminal almost every time when i hit alt F1, 2,3,4,5,6,7 all but one terminal will come up ... also ps listing shows all but one terminal ttyv* sometimes its ttyv5 sometimes missing ttyv2 other times (rarely) all 6

Re: missing ttyv5 in freebsd 7.0 rc-1

2008-02-04 Thread Pieter de Goeje
On Monday 04 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: loaded free bsd 7.0 rc1 and often wont boot with all terminal e boots then when i hit alt F1, 2,3,4,5,6,7 all but one will come up sometimes its ttyv5 sometimes missing ttyv2 other times (rarely) all 6 will hit like nothing is wrong ?

linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Stacey Roberts
Hello, I've just completed installing FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE (Sat 2nd Feb 2008) and having finished installing (latest frokm ports) X, Gnome and linux-opera, I find that clicking on the linux-opera menu item fails to start Opera. Nothing gets logged to messages / security, and I can't think

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I find that clicking on the linux-opera menu item fails to start Opera. Nothing gets logged to messages / security, and I can't think of where else to look for any hints as to what's going on. start linux opera from xterm and read what's up. do you have linprocfs

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Stacey Roberts
Hi Wojciech! Thanks for getting back to me. On Sun, 03 Feb 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: I find that clicking on the linux-opera menu item fails to start Opera. Nothing gets logged to messages / security, and I can't think of where else to look for any hints as to what's going on.

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
$ linux-opera [1] 2263 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ shm_allow_removed is disable, set OPERA_NUM_XSHM to 0 to disable shared memory. ELF binary type 0 not known. ELF binary type 0 not known. ELF binary type 0 not known. ^^^ this is strange - like no linux emulation active at all. no more

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
$ cat /etc/fstab # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass# /dev/ad4s2b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/ad4s2a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/ad4s2e /home ufs rw

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Stacey Roberts
Hi Wojciech! Thanks for the response. On Sun, 03 Feb 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: $ cat /etc/fstab # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/ad4s2b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/ad4s2a /

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Wojciech Puchar
so please ask some else :) i have no other ideas. and please check your mailserver (respond on priv please) Feb 3 21:42:04 wojtek sm-mta[7276]: m13Kf36P007273: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1003/1003), delay=00:01:01, xdelay=00:01:01, mailer=esmtp, pri=31239,

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:33:10 + Stacey Roberts wrote: On Sun, 03 Feb 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: and turn ON linux emulation because this is probably your problem :) Err., if you meant to ensure that linux_enable=YES is in /etc/rc.conf, and that linux-base is installed, then these

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:07:06 + Stacey Roberts wrote: % kldstat | grep linux $ kldstat | grep linux $ Nothing was returned.., OK. Can you try kldload linux as root, repeat that kldstat... and if it shows linux.ko then try to run linux-opera? WBR -- bsam

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Stacey Roberts
to ensure that linux_enable=YES is in /etc/rc.conf, and that linux-base is installed, then these have already been done. Strange. Please, give an output for: % uname -a $ uname -a FreeBSD ibm-t61p.snipped.snipped 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Feb 3 15:42:51 GMT 2008 snipped

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Stacey Roberts
Hi Boris, Good to hear from you.., On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Boris Samorodov wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:07:06 + Stacey Roberts wrote: % kldstat | grep linux $ kldstat | grep linux $ Nothing was returned.., OK. Can you try kldload linux as root, repeat that kldstat... and if

Re: linux-opera-9.25.20071214 on FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 fails to start up

2008-02-03 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:39:57 + Stacey Roberts wrote: On Mon, 04 Feb 2008, Boris Samorodov wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 21:07:06 + Stacey Roberts wrote: % kldstat | grep linux $ kldstat | grep linux $ Nothing was returned.., OK. Can you try kldload linux as root,

can't launch inkscape in freebsd 7.0-rc1

2008-01-21 Thread lveax
$ inkscape [Mon 4:16:03pm] Duplicate large block deallocation of 0x86a1000 Duplicate large block deallocation Emergency save activated! then i must use pkill -9 inkscape to kill it .. ___

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 syncache problems under high load

2008-01-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
s3raphi wrote: This looks similar to something that has already been fixed in July. I am assuming that the July fix is included in RC1? http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-7-TCP-syncache-fix%3A-request-for-testers-to11515217.html#a11776616 Yes. Please follow up on net@ and with a PR if no

FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 syncache problems under high load

2008-01-19 Thread s3raphi
kernel, and have this problem on both ethernet cards I have tested with(nfe and bge) These two machines were connected by a switch, but are now directly connected and have the same problem regardless. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-7.0-RC1-syncache-problems-under-high

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-PRE/AMD64: missing f77/Fortran compiler ...

2008-01-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
Daniel Rucci wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: No, it's not convenient. There is a large maintenance cost for keeping the fortran compiler in the base system for little gain (nothing in FreeBSD uses it), and it is also only of use to a small subset of FreeBSD users, so this is a perfect situation

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-PRE/AMD64: missing f77/Fortran compiler ...

2008-01-11 Thread Daniel Rucci
Kris Kennaway wrote: No, it's not convenient. There is a large maintenance cost for keeping the fortran compiler in the base system for little gain (nothing in FreeBSD uses it), and it is also only of use to a small subset of FreeBSD users, so this is a perfect situation where moving it to

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-11 Thread Derek Ragona
At 01:43 AM 1/11/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: On Jan 10, 2008 3:52 PM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 10, 2008 3:14 PM, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/10/08, Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps I need to re-evaluate my line of thinking. Light

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-11 Thread Derrick Ryalls
On Jan 11, 2008 7:19 AM, Derek Ragona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 01:43 AM 1/11/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: On Jan 10, 2008 3:52 PM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 10, 2008 3:14 PM, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/10/08, Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Derek Ragona
At 06:51 PM 1/9/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: Greetings, I have a RAID fileserver plugged into a UPS and nut is able to communicate with it successfully. With the winds making the lights flicker, I started looking into having the computer shut down when power goes out for more than say 5 minutes

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Derrick Ryalls
Greetings, I have a RAID fileserver plugged into a UPS and nut is able to communicate with it successfully. With the winds making the lights flicker, I started looking into having the computer shut down when power goes out for more than say 5 minutes or so. Looking at the

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Derek Ragona
At 01:40 PM 1/10/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: Greetings, I have a RAID fileserver plugged into a UPS and nut is able to communicate with it successfully. With the winds making the lights flicker, I started looking into having the computer shut down when power goes out for more than

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Derrick Ryalls
Greetings, I have a RAID fileserver plugged into a UPS and nut is able to communicate with it successfully. With the winds making the lights flicker, I started looking into having the computer shut down when power goes out for more than say 5 minutes or so. Looking at the

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Derek Ragona
At 04:43 PM 1/10/2008, Derrick Ryalls wrote: Greetings, I have a RAID fileserver plugged into a UPS and nut is able to communicate with it successfully. With the winds making the lights flicker, I started looking into having the computer shut down when power goes out for

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Bob Johnson
On 1/10/08, Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps I need to re-evaluate my line of thinking. Light sometime flicker, but power almost never goes out. When it does it is either back on in less than 1 minute, or out for hours. If the UPS detects critical correctly and gives me at

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Kurt Buff
On Jan 10, 2008 3:14 PM, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/10/08, Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps I need to re-evaluate my line of thinking. Light sometime flicker, but power almost never goes out. When it does it is either back on in less than 1 minute, or out

Re: Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-10 Thread Derrick Ryalls
On Jan 10, 2008 3:52 PM, Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 10, 2008 3:14 PM, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/10/08, Derrick Ryalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps I need to re-evaluate my line of thinking. Light sometime flicker, but power almost never goes out.

Nut and RAID on FreeBSD 7.0

2008-01-09 Thread Derrick Ryalls
Greetings, I have a RAID fileserver plugged into a UPS and nut is able to communicate with it successfully. With the winds making the lights flicker, I started looking into having the computer shut down when power goes out for more than say 5 minutes or so. Looking at the documentation, I found

Strange messages when booting freebsd 7.0-beta4

2008-01-07 Thread vittorio
rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 #0: Thu Dec 27 22:18:53 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HP03 module_register: module pci/ichss_pci already exists! Module pci/ichss_pci failed to register: 17 module_register: module cpu

Asterisk-addons FreeBSD 7.0 :(

2008-01-06 Thread David Alanis
.) We are also big into VoIP and just realized that FreeBSD 7.0 will not build asterisk-addons on our home/production servers. So after losing a ton of sleep we are now having to revert back to FreeBSD 6.2. In short, can anyone fill us in to which FreeBSD distribution is known to work

Re: Asterisk-addons FreeBSD 7.0 :(

2008-01-06 Thread Frank Shute
is rc.conf(5) 2.) We are also big into VoIP and just realized that FreeBSD 7.0 will not build asterisk-addons on our home/production servers. So after losing a ton of sleep we are now having to revert back to FreeBSD 6.2. In short, can anyone fill us in to which FreeBSD distribution is known

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-PRE/AMD64: missing f77/Fortran compiler ...

2008-01-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
O. Hartmann wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Sorry about the noise, but I miss g77 or f77 on my FreeBSD 7.0-PRE box. Where is it? Hasn't gcc 4.2 as incorporated in FreeBSD as the native compiler also a native fortran 90 compiler? No, you need to install the gfortran port

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-PRE/AMD64: missing f77/Fortran compiler ...

2008-01-05 Thread O. Hartmann
Kris Kennaway wrote: O. Hartmann wrote: Sorry about the noise, but I miss g77 or f77 on my FreeBSD 7.0-PRE box. Where is it? Hasn't gcc 4.2 as incorporated in FreeBSD as the native compiler also a native fortran 90 compiler? No, you need to install the gfortran port. This is presumably

snd_hda(freebsd 7.0 rc1) doesn't work on dell latitude D630

2008-01-04 Thread lveax
hey all: i can get sound from my d630. i added the snd_hda support to my kernel configure file. i can find info about my onboard sound card,but it still didn't work. pcm0: HDA Codec: Sigmatel (Unknown) pcm0: HDA Driver Revision: 20071129_0050 the pciconf info about it: [EMAIL

Re: snd_hda(freebsd 7.0 rc1) doesn't work on dell latitude D630

2008-01-04 Thread Frank Staals
also tried the oss drivers, without success though: at the time ( about a month ago ) it even locked up my system. [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -a FreeBSD Rena.FStaals.net 7.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4 #0: Fri Dec 21 11:48:15 CET 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RENAKERNEL i386

FreeBSD 7.0-PRE/AMD64: missing f77/Fortran compiler ...

2008-01-03 Thread O. Hartmann
Sorry about the noise, but I miss g77 or f77 on my FreeBSD 7.0-PRE box. Where is it? Hasn't gcc 4.2 as incorporated in FreeBSD as the native compiler also a native fortran 90 compiler? Regards, Oliver ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-PRE/AMD64: missing f77/Fortran compiler ...

2008-01-03 Thread Kris Kennaway
O. Hartmann wrote: Sorry about the noise, but I miss g77 or f77 on my FreeBSD 7.0-PRE box. Where is it? Hasn't gcc 4.2 as incorporated in FreeBSD as the native compiler also a native fortran 90 compiler? No, you need to install the gfortran port. This is presumably documented in the release

FreeBSD 7.0 ISO disk3 question

2008-01-02 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Dear All, I noticed that 7.0 and 6.3 release candidates consist of three iso images. What is the content of the ISO disc3. (Additional language support or additional packages or something else?) Best, Predrag ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

FreeBSD 7.0 ISO disc3 question

2008-01-02 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Dear All, I noticed that 7.0 and 6.3 release candidates consist of three iso images. What is the content of the ISO disc3. (Additional language support or additional packages or something else?) Best, Predrag ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 ISO disc3 question

2008-01-02 Thread Manolis Kiagias
Predrag Punosevac wrote: Dear All, I noticed that 7.0 and 6.3 release candidates consist of three iso images. What is the content of the ISO disc3. (Additional language support or additional packages or something else?) Best, Predrag ___

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 ISO disc3 question

2008-01-02 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Manolis Kiagias wrote: Predrag Punosevac wrote: Dear All, I noticed that 7.0 and 6.3 release candidates consist of three iso images. What is the content of the ISO disc3. (Additional language support or additional packages or something else?) Best, Predrag

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-12-27 Thread Jim Pazarena
Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my name is Cesar. I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. 6.X is the last of versions meant primarilly for single

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-12-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Jim Pazarena wrote: When installing a test of 7.0 B4, I found that directories which I have traditionally used (/usr/local/libexec /usr/local/include /usr/local/lib /usr/local/sbin /usr/local/man/* etc) and /etc/make.conf are not visible

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-12-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
Jim Pazarena wrote: Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my name is Cesar. I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. 6.X is the last of versions meant

Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-24 Thread Jurjen Middendorp
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:43:24PM -0800, kasthurirangan balaji wrote: Hi, I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go through the sun website to understand the advantages of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD have a BTree/B+Tree(replicating c

Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-24 Thread Garrett Cooper
Jurjen Middendorp wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:43:24PM -0800, kasthurirangan balaji wrote: Hi, I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go through the sun website to understand the advantages of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD

FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-23 Thread kasthurirangan balaji
Hi, I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go through the sun website to understand the advantages of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD have a BTree/B+Tree(replicating c++ multimaps, but file based) by default on ZFS which i guess should

Re: FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
kasthurirangan balaji wrote: Hi, I am using FreeBSD 6.1 on my laptop. I understand that FreeBSD 7.0 will have ZFS file system. I did go through the sun website to understand the advantages of ZFS. Given that, will FreeBSD have a BTree/B+Tree(replicating c++ multimaps, but file based) by default

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-21 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:07:32PM +, Chris wrote: Interesting so I learnt 2 things here csup exists so no need to install cvsup and I should run 'make delete-old-libs' . Basically I have done the following. Well, you don't _have_ to (nobody is forcing you to do it). But if you don't, old

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-21 Thread Chris
On 08/11/2007, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done through cvsup from 6.2-STABLE

sysinstall segfaults on FreeBSD-7.0-beta3/i386 VMWare

2007-11-21 Thread Renaud Métrich
xmlcatmgr-2.2 xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps [...] xvid-1.1.3,1 returns failure. DEBUG: Signal 11 caught! That's bad! More details: - FreeBSD-7.0-beta3/i386 bootonly CD image - FTP mirror used is France - VMWare Workstation 6.0.0 - 512MB memory virtual machine - 8 GB virtual disk with default partitioning

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-20 Thread Yuri
Quoting Yuri Pankov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yes, that's what I'm talking about, you don't have any optimizations (-Ox) in flags to cc and that's why it fails. Make sure that you don't have CFLAGS set to '' in your environment or elsewhere (cd /usr/src ; make -V CFLAGS will show your current

FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Yuri
I just upgraded my system, with 7.0-BETA2 CD. After this I updated the sources from CVS and tried to make buildworld. But I am getting the following compilation error. What may be wrong? Seems like some incompatibility between asembler and compiler? Yuri ../../../crypto/openssl/crypto

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 06:24:36 Yuri wrote: I just upgraded my system, with 7.0-BETA2 CD. After this I updated the sources from CVS and tried to make buildworld. But I am getting the following compilation error. What may be wrong? Seems like some incompatibility between asembler and

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Yuri
More like incompatibility with your CFLAGS. Are you using CFLAGS with no optimizations (can't guess from pasted log)? I didn't specify any special CFLAGS. And my /etc/make.conf is empty. Yuri ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Sébastien LEFEVRE
Hello, I have the same problem and you need to add this options in your kernel options file: device crypto device cryptodev device enc For me, now everything it's ok. Sébastien. Yuri Pankov [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : On Tuesday 20 November 2007 06:24:36 Yuri wrote: I

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 06:40:53 Yuri wrote: More like incompatibility with your CFLAGS. Are you using CFLAGS with no optimizations (can't guess from pasted log)? I didn't specify any special CFLAGS. And my /etc/make.conf is empty. Yuri What about /etc/src.conf and more complete build

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Yuri
What about /etc/src.conf and more complete build log (at least whole compiler line)? I don't have /etc/src.conf file. Please see last few build commands below. Versions of relevant commands: cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] GNU assembler 2.15 [FreeBSD] 2004-05-23 Yuri cc -fpic -DPIC

Re: FreeBSD-7.0 fails to compile after upgrade

2007-11-19 Thread Yuri Pankov
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 09:30:40 Yuri wrote: What about /etc/src.conf and more complete build log (at least whole compiler line)? I don't have /etc/src.conf file. Please see last few build commands below. Versions of relevant commands: cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] GNU

Re: FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-15 Thread Ivan Voras
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images? This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure: http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf Similar weaknesses have been found in the entire MD/SHA

Re: FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-15 Thread Mark Staudinger
On 11/14/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Staudinger wrote: I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched both before posting. I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel and AMD-based machines that I work

Re: FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
Mark Staudinger wrote: On 11/14/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Staudinger wrote: I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched both before posting. I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel and AMD-based

FreeBSD 7.0 Beta-2 can't find INDEX

2007-11-14 Thread Friedrich, Steven
I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 Beta-2 from the bootonly iso and from CD1 iso. The bootonly iso installs over the net and failed to fetch the INDEX when trying to install ports, i.e., xorg, etc. CD1 did the same thing. Is this a known problem? I tried to search the mailing list archives

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 Beta-2 can't find INDEX

2007-11-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
Friedrich, Steven wrote: I tried to install FreeBSD 7.0 Beta-2 from the bootonly iso and from CD1 iso. The bootonly iso installs over the net and failed to fetch the INDEX when trying to install ports, i.e., xorg, etc. CD1 did the same thing. Is this a known problem? Yes, packages are only

Re: FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-14 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images? This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure: http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf Similar weaknesses have been found in

Re: FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images? This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure: http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf Similar

Re: FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
Mark Staudinger wrote: I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched both before posting. I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel and AMD-based machines that I work with. I'm using the i386 release. I've previously used FreeBSD

FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2 (i386) on Opteron?

2007-11-14 Thread Mark Staudinger
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched both before posting. I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel and AMD-based machines that I work with. I'm using the i386 release. I've previously used FreeBSD-4.9R and 6.2R for i386

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-09 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. 6.X is the last of versions meant primarilly for single

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. 6.X is the last of

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-09 Thread Garrett Cooper
Albert Shih wrote: Le 08/11/2007 à 19:32:39+0100, Roland Smith a écrit On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-09 Thread Albert Shih
Le 09/11/2007 à 06:12:48+0100, Roland Smith a écrit On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:14:13PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: Be careful if you not using standard shell becauseif you using a shell come from ports Root should _never_ use a shell from ports. You can use the 'toor' account for

Re: How to mount usb flash disk on FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-08 Thread Tsetsbold
, 2007 at 09:13:15PM +0800, Tsetsbold wrote: Hi all, I am newbie to UNIX and using FreeBSD 7.0 current ,and I cannot mount my USB flash disk. I searched on google but couldn't find anything helpful. I did this steps. #mkdir /mnt/usb #mount /dev/da0 /mnt/usb mount: /dev/da0 : Invalid

How to mount usb flash disk on FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-08 Thread Tsetsbold
Hi all, I am newbie to UNIX and using FreeBSD 7.0 current ,and I cannot mount my USB flash disk. I searched on google but couldn't find anything helpful. I did this steps. #mkdir /mnt/usb #mount /dev/da0 /mnt/usb mount: /dev/da0 : Invalid argument # mount -t vfat /dev/da0 /mnt/usb mount

Re: How to mount usb flash disk on FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-08 Thread Oliver Herold
Hi if this is a card reader then it will be most of the time something like mount_msdosfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usb Just have a look into /dev Cheers Oliver On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:13:15PM +0800, Tsetsbold wrote: Hi all, I am newbie to UNIX and using FreeBSD 7.0 current ,and I cannot mount

Re: How to mount usb flash disk on FreeBSD 7.0

2007-11-08 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Thursday, November 08, 2007 23:02:06 +0800 Tsetsbold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi On Nov 8, 2007 9:51 PM, Oliver Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi if this is a card reader then it will be most of the time something like mount_msdosfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt/usb Now it works well. Thanks

About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-08 Thread Expresso Digital ISP
Hi, my name is Cesar. I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. -- Att.   Expresso Digital ISP - tecnologia.multimidia.seguranca Cesar Vogelsanger MCSO - Módulo Certified Security Officer Administrador de Tecnologia

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-08 Thread Aryeh Friedman
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my name is Cesar. I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. 6.X is the last of versions meant primarilly for single processing machines (with some

Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3

2007-11-08 Thread Mario Lobo
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, my name is Cesar. I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a newest version and after old version. 6.X is the last of versions

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >