FreeBSD 9 Xorg server failed to configure

Hi, colleagues! I am installing FreeBSD 9 + XORG + KDE4 to my Acer notebook. I have updated Freebsd using "freebsd-update" and ports using "portsnap". Further I compiled Xorg using "make BATCH="YES" install clean". Xorg has been compiled suc

Re: FreeBSD 9 port XORG failed to install

Hi Савельев Владимир, El día Saturday, April 27, 2013 a las 08:59:36PM +0400, Савельев Владимир escribió: >Hi, colleagues! > >I am trying to install FreeBSD 9 to my notebook Acer Aspire V3-571G. >Ports I am trying to install: > >/usr/ports/x11/xorg >

FreeBSD 9 port XORG failed to install

Hi, colleagues! I am trying to install FreeBSD 9 to my notebook Acer Aspire V3-571G. Ports I am trying to install: /usr/ports/x11/xorg My issue is that build fails on an unclear reason. Workflow is: 1. Install FreeBSD 2. Install system updates 3. Download and extract

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote: Warren Block writes: On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote: It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk, but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use partitions on a disk that any other partitions are

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

Warren Block writes: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote: > >> It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk, >> but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use >> partitions on a disk that any other partitions are being used by >> anything else, in

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 12:25 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > Booting the same Windows install alternately in a VM and then on real > hardware may trigger the "Genuine Advantage" annoyance. This is true, but for some exceptional cases perhaps untrue. I wasn't aware about this possibility, but it does

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote: Eduardo Morras writes: On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST) wrote: Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can this installation be >done? In particular

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 09:05 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: > It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk, > but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use > partitions on a disk that any other partitions are being used by > anything else, including FreeBSD i

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

Eduardo Morras writes: > On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST) > wrote: > >> Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on >> a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can >> this installation be >done? In particular, is there a way to install >> 9

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:31 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:14:05 +0100 > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 13:51 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > > As an addon to other answers, you can install VirtualBox, create a > > > minimal hard disk with MBR boot menu th

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:14:05 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 13:51 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > > As an addon to other answers, you can install VirtualBox, create a > > minimal hard disk with MBR boot menu that points to the WindowsXP > > partition. This way you don't need to

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 13:51 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: > As an addon to other answers, you can install VirtualBox, create a > minimal hard disk with MBR boot menu that points to the WindowsXP > partition. This way you don't need to restart in WinXP. The same can > be done from WinXP side, a minim

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST) wrote: > Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a > computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can this > installation be >done? In particular, is there a way to install 9.1 so that > it can be booted fro

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:27:45 +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST), leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote: Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? Yes. If so, how can this instal

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:49:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > "Partition Magic" > > I would avoid to use proprietary software, ntfs, fat16 and fat32 are > full supported by Linux gparted, available for free as in beer at > http://partedmagic.com

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote: > "Partition Magic" I would avoid to use proprietary software, ntfs, fat16 and fat32 are full supported by Linux gparted, available for free as in beer at http://partedmagic.com as a live media. Perhaps you need to defragment the Windows partiti

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:07 PM, wrote: > Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a > computer on which Windows XP currently resides? As others have already answered, yes. The risks are minimal if you are careful but you will always have the risk of breaking someth

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST), leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote: > Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be > installed on a computer on which Windows XP currently > resides? Yes. > If so, how can this installation be done? First of all, you need a tool to mak

Re: FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST) wrote: > Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed > on a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how > can this installation be done? In particular, is there a way to > install 9.1 so that it can be booted from th

FreeBSD 9 and Windows XP

Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can this installation be done? In particular, is there a way to install 9.1 so that it can be booted from the traditional master boot record? It is important that

Re: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:15:41AM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hi, > > El d?a Wednesday, January 02, 2013 a las 08:19:11PM -0800, Joseph Olatt > escribi?: > > > > > I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and > > haven&#x

Re: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9

On 01/03/13 04:19, Joseph Olatt wrote: > > I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and > haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and > it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming > through ba

Re: audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9

Hi, El día Wednesday, January 02, 2013 a las 08:19:11PM -0800, Joseph Olatt escribió: > > I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and > haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and > it appears that I can connect an

audio/baresip on FreeBSD 9

I've been trying to get baresip to work on my FreeBSD 9.x laptop and haven't had much success. I register successfully to callcentric.com and it appears that I can connect and there is a stream of data coming through based on the status display: [0:00:08] audio=

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 24 November 2012, at 16:36, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 11/24/2012 05:58 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:38:35 -0600 >> Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> >>> I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that >>> provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a sma

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

--On November 24, 2012 10:38:35 AM -0600 Tim Daneliuk wrote: I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not a high arrival rate environment but it does need to be rock solid (which FBSD 4-8 have been).

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Tim Daneliuk wrote: On 11/24/2012 03:48 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: It is not however sufficient to get you a completely upgraded system: you will still have to re-install all of your ports. Otherwise, as you end up trying to upgrade ports by ones and twos over time, you'll

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 11/24/2012 06:16 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: On 25/11/2012 04:06, Tim Daneliuk wrote: But I have had essentially no problems doing in-place major rev updates with FreeBSD thus far. The only breakage I am worried about now is whether the new compiler change breaks things that used to work just f

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 11/24/2012 05:58 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:38:35 -0600 Tim Daneliuk wrote: I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not a high arrival rate environment but it does need to

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 25/11/2012 04:06, Tim Daneliuk wrote: But I have had essentially no problems doing in-place major rev updates with FreeBSD thus far. The only breakage I am worried about now is whether the new compiler change breaks things that used to work just fine. For example, will my make.conf settings

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

Hi, On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 10:38:35 -0600 Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that > provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not > a high arrival rate environment but it does need to be rock solid > (which FBSD 4-8 have been).

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 11/24/2012 03:48 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: It is not however sufficient to get you a completely upgraded system: you will still have to re-install all of your ports. Otherwise, as you end up trying to upgrade ports by ones and twos over time, you'll end up with a complete rat's nest of contra

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 24/11/2012 16:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I am contemplating moving to the FBSD 9 family. Is this branch ready > for production or should I wait a while yet? I ordinarily avoid x.0 > releases of anything and I know 9.1 is soon going to be with us. 9-STABLE works for me. I've run into a few qui

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

Tim Daneliuk writes: > On 11/24/2012 11:19 AM, Lucas B. Cohen wrote: >> I wouldn't >> blindly trust and drop an operating system on production servers, no >> matter how good the feedback from outside my organization sounds. > > In general, I'd agree with you. Certainly, that's been the case > wi

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 11/24/2012 11:19 AM, Lucas B. Cohen wrote: I wouldn't blindly trust and drop an operating system on production servers, no matter how good the feedback from outside my organization sounds. In general, I'd agree with you. Certainly, that's been the case with Linux, AIX, and so on over the ye

Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

On 2012.11.24 17:38, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I am contemplating moving to the FBSD 9 family. Is this branch ready > for production or should I wait a while yet? This probably won't help much, but I wouldn't call any system "production ready" until I've tested it as thoroughly as possible and quali

Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready?

I am currently running FBSD 8.3-STABLE on a production server that provides http, dns, smtp, and so on for a small domain. This is not a high arrival rate environment but it does need to be rock solid (which FBSD 4-8 have been). I am contemplating moving to the FBSD 9 family. Is this branch rea

Re: Freebsd 9 Startx

Issue solved; I forgot to edit .xinitrc. Cheers, Hooman On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 +, Hooman Oroojeni wrote: > > Dear All, > > I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error. > > Any idea t

Re: Freebsd 9 Startx

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 +, Hooman Oroojeni wrote: > Dear All, > I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error. > Any idea to help is appreciated. You need to show the error message for diagnostics and suggestions better than pure guessing. :-) Meanwhile,

Re: Freebsd 9 Startx

Hi, On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 + Hooman Oroojeni wrote: > Dear All, > I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error. I think that you have mist a paste command here. Anyway, what graphics adaptor are you using? Intel? It it is Intel, read about Intel KMS.

Re: how many memory is needed for FreeBSD 9 ?

Le Mon, 22 Oct 2012 03:49:50 +1100, andrew clarke a écrit : Hello, > > I'm updating an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.1 with 64 MB ram (44MB > > available) but now FreeBSD 9.1 panics at boot time: > > > > panic: kmem_malloc(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated? > > That's one very ol

Re: how many memory is needed for FreeBSD 9 ?

On 21 October 2012 12:49, andrew clarke wrote: > On Sun 2012-10-21 18:21:59 UTC+0200, Patrick Lamaiziere > (patf...@davenulle.org) wrote: > >> I'm updating an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.1 with 64 MB ram (44MB >> available) but now FreeBSD 9.1 panics at boot time: >> >> panic: kmem_malloc(419430

Re: how many memory is needed for FreeBSD 9 ?

On Sun 2012-10-21 18:21:59 UTC+0200, Patrick Lamaiziere (patf...@davenulle.org) wrote: > I'm updating an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.1 with 64 MB ram (44MB > available) but now FreeBSD 9.1 panics at boot time: > > panic: kmem_malloc(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated? That's one

how many memory is needed for FreeBSD 9 ?

Hi, I'm updating an old laptop running FreeBSD 8.1 with 64 MB ram (44MB available) but now FreeBSD 9.1 panics at boot time: panic: kmem_malloc(4194304): kmem_map too small: 24584192 allocated? Any work-around? Thanks regards. ___ freebsd-questions@fre

Huawei E173 modem doesn't work on FreeBSD 9

Hi Folks, I'm failed to access E173 modem on FreeBSD 9.0 using serial port. Yes, I got information from the web that this device is not supported yet by the default driver, and the u3g driver need to be updated. ( http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/usb-159919-Patch-for-HUAWEI-E173-u3g-umodem-td47

Re: No sound in my FreeBSD 9

Maybe i should use audio/oss instead of snd_ich ? - e^(π.i) + 1 = 0 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/No-sound-in-my-FreeBSD-9-tp5720280p5724585.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

> Hi, > On Saturday 23 June 2012 15:08:53 Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I > > tried the opposite. > I have here 2 hard disks and 2 flash drives with USB 2.0. Three of them work > on FreeBSD on an USB 3.0 port. One hard disk only

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

windoze, under linux) is enough. If the ROI does not exceed the expenditure to meet a specification that only applies to a niche segment of the potential market, then it is in all probability not going to happen. Right. Fine. There is not written on them "conforms to USB Mass Storage standard"

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:00:29 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar articulated: > >> ports. > >> > > Same as in my case. > > > > USB is more a lottery than real computing for me. > but this is not USB standard fault, but USB device manufacturers that > cannot really read standard specifications. "It works

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD, which is why I do not exhibit such a negative attitude, except of course when I do attempt to plug one in a FreeBSD machine with negative results. I do not know what is more pathetic; the fact that so many devices fail to operate correctly --

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

ports. Same as in my case. USB is more a lottery than real computing for me. but this is not USB standard fault, but USB device manufacturers that cannot really read standard specifications. "It works" (under windoze, under linux) is enough. ___ fr

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working > way > > to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB > mass > > storage devices which work with *BSD :) > > > Just my 5 yen, > > -|-__ YA

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

Hi, On Saturday 23 June 2012 18:18:58 Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:05 +0700 > > Erich Dollansky articulated: > > USB is more a lottery than real computing for me. > > That is really sad. I am sort of forced to use USB devices on a > daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve Free

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:05 +0700 Erich Dollansky articulated: > USB is more a lottery than real computing for me. That is really sad. I am sort of forced to use USB devices on a daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD, which is why I do not exhibit such a negative attitude, excep

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Saturday 23 June 2012 11:52:53 Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY > > > > Then re-plug it. > > > > I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only > > tested with the timing of MS Wi

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

Hi, On Saturday 23 June 2012 15:08:53 Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I > tried the opposite. > I have here 2 hard disks and 2 flash drives with USB 2.0. Three of them work on FreeBSD on an USB 3.0 port. One hard disk only works

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY > > Then re-plug it. > > I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only > tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is > difficult to autodetect th

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

What if a USB mass storage device works with some BSDs but not all? well the only thing i never experiences with USB pendrives is a one that works everytime properly. Everything else is possible. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://li

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

> My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working way > to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB mass > storage devices which work with *BSD :) > Just my 5 yen, -|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku | __ < What if a USB mass storage device works with

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

and hardware in the lab on last week. I reformatted the USB drive with extFAT and standard block size on Windows 7. The USB drive is now seen again on FreeBSD and recognized as this points that the pendrive's controller is not just flaky but horrid. The communiation with OS, and how/whether it is

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On 06/22/12 08:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote: >> I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD >> shown below. >> When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was >> vis

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

of data on it - it was > > visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected. > > A Linux system at the lab was also capable of recognizing it. After > > that, I tried to operate on the stick on a Notebook, FreeBSD 9, and > > another station, FreeBSD 10. But FreeBSD didn't recognize the

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:01 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD > shown below. > When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was > visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected. > A Linux system at t

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

incapable of handling the 64GB drive. I do not have issues with USB it's not about capacity. But seems some quirks for that pendrive (which have buggy firmware) has to be added, as it doesn't respond for inquiry command. sorry i am not USB expert. umass1: on usbus7 (probe0:umass-sim1:1:0:

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Friday 22 June 2012 08:01:38 O. Hartmann wrote: > I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD > shown below. > When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was > visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected. > A Linux system at t

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:01 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD > shown below. > When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was > visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected. > A Linux system at t

USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

I have a USB drive/stick, Lexar USB Flash drive as reported by FreeBSD shown below. When first used, I was able to put approx. 30 GB of data on it - it was visible to FreeBSD 9 and 10 as expected. A Linux system at the lab was also capable of recognizing it. After that, I tried to operate on the

Re: No sound in my FreeBSD 9

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:21 PM, sw2wolf wrote: > > pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

No sound in my FreeBSD 9

e^(π.i) + 1 = 0 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/No-sound-in-my-FreeBSD-9-tp5720280.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://l

Re: Wterm and FreeBSD 9

On 7 May 2012 19:35, Joe Altman wrote: > Greetings... > > For FreeBSD 8, we see this for wterm: > > BROKEN=         does not compile > > .if ${OSVERSION} > 97 > BROKEN=         fails to build with new utmpx > .endif > > I'd like to confirm that wterm will build and run on 9. I'm currently > ru

Wterm and FreeBSD 9

Greetings... For FreeBSD 8, we see this for wterm: BROKEN= does not compile .if ${OSVERSION} > 97 BROKEN= fails to build with new utmpx .endif I'd like to confirm that wterm will build and run on 9. I'm currently running 8.3-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p1 #0. Does anyone

Installing VMware Tools on FreeBSD 9, amd64

I've installed the compat6x libraries and made a symlink to /lib for libc.so.6 as per some docs I found; however, the vmware tools installation is still failing with: Unable to copy the source file /usr/local/lib/vmware-tools/modules/binary/FreeBSD8.0-amd64/vmxnet.ko to the destination file /

Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing

On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC > wrote: > >> No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they share >> the routing tables. It works. Try it. > > You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6'

Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they share the routing tables. It works. Try it. You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6's jails. It must get confused and send your public IP on tho

Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing

hare the network stack under Jails v1 they share the routing tables. It works. Try it. The question is, is it possible to do something similar with FreeBSD 9 jails (v2 I guess) without the overhead of running NAT? The jail with the private IP *can* access the HOST's public services but no

Re: Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing

Do I understand this right? Working in FreeBSD 6.x: interface em0: 1.2.3.4/24 <-- public IP, host only 192.168.1.1/24 <-- private IP, host only 192.168.1.2/24 <-- Jail #1 192.168.1.3/24 <-- Jail #2 With this configuration you had no problems accessing the

Changes in Jails from FreeBSD 6 to FreeBSD 9 -- particularly, networking and routing

Hi All OK, so I have a server that has been running FreeBSD 6.1 and a bunch of jails, providing a few limited services. I am migrating these from real hardware and FreeBSD 6.1 with jail running, to a Xen based VPS running FreeBSD 9.0-R with a kernel rebuild from a GENERIC kernel to GENERIC plu

Re: FreeBSD 9's SSH HPN

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > Is the HPN patchset included with the base OpenSSH the full patchset? Does > it include the threaded CTR patch? I can't seem to find a clear answer to > this. > crypto/openssh/README.hpn references it so I would assume so. -- Adam Vande Mo

FreeBSD 9's SSH HPN

Is the HPN patchset included with the base OpenSSH the full patchset? Does it include the threaded CTR patch? I can't seem to find a clear answer to this. Thanks, Mark ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma

Re: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'...

In the "new" way of booting... you need to have the cd because the own cd is the root filesystem... and in fact is live filesystem too so unless you're booting from mfsroot... I assume you should have that line in /etc/fstab inside the iso image but if you're using mfsroot... I really e

Re: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'...

--On 01 March 2012 11:53 +0100 ego...@ramattack.net wrote: So I recomend you reading last mails of mine in freebsd-hackers... Hope it helps, Bye! For what it's worth - I've resolved the issue I had (which was basically the system booted, but failed trying to re-mount root as RW, and hence

Re: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'...

Take a look at freebsd-hackers mailing list... I have suggested some change in some Makefile and sh script in order to unless at this moment to be able to have an unattended system built with sysinstall (the idea I think it was to maintain sysinstall in 9.0 unless) and using you're install.cfg.

FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'...

Hi, I've got a 9.0-R amd64 system I'm trying to netboot / pxeboot from the network, to install other machines (and do fixups etc.) I set this up as we setup previous versions here - but setting up a tftp server, and nfs server - and 'dumping' the contents of the install CD to a directory on

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:20:03 +0100 Michael Cardell Widerkrantz wrote: > Janos Dohanics , 2012-02-08 19:42 (+0100): > > > 4. Also, with GPT, one has to be in single user mode to synchronize > > disks - correct? > > I think the guide you linked to: > > http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

pends on who you ask :) and on your intended usage. > > > 2. Is there a way to use the old sysinstall to install FreeBSD 9? > > Not using the standard distribution IIUC. You might want to look > at http://druidbsd.sf.net/ > [...] This

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

Janos Dohanics , 2012-02-08 19:42 (+0100): > 4. Also, with GPT, one has to be in single user mode to synchronize > disks - correct? I think the guide you linked to: http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/1071 meant that you have to be in single user mode until you have edited /etc/fstab to

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

nstall to install FreeBSD 9? Not using the standard distribution IIUC. You might want to look at http://druidbsd.sf.net/ > 3. It seems that setting up gmirror is more involved with GPT > (http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/1071); now I have a > mirror for each of the filesystems /, /

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

Auto result to get it to work? Gary On 2/8/2012 12:00 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:42:59 -0500 Janos Dohanics wrote: Hello Everyone, May be I should have searched more for answers, but after installing FreeBSD 9 with gmirror, I am wondering if the experts here have

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

> 3. Assuming one has enough RAM, is zfs mirror or raidz recommended over > gmirror? zfs mirror but I would not recommend a raidz root on zfs. -- George Kontostanos Aicom telecoms ltd http://www.aisecure.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing

Re: FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:42:59 -0500 Janos Dohanics wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > May be I should have searched more for answers, but after installing > FreeBSD 9 with gmirror, I am wondering if the experts here have some > recommendations for "best practices". >

FreeBSD 9, GPT and gmirror

Hello Everyone, May be I should have searched more for answers, but after installing FreeBSD 9 with gmirror, I am wondering if the experts here have some recommendations for "best practices". 1. The Guided partitioning doesn't suggest any more to create /var, /tmp, /usr, etc. file

Re: pkg_rmleaves in FreeBSD 9

On 08/02/2012 04:55, Kevin Zheng wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I often use pkg_rmleaves(1) to uninstall unused programs on FreeBSD. I'm in the process of test-driving a FreeBSD 9 system on a virtual machine. I've noticed that pkg_rmleaves doesn

pkg_rmleaves in FreeBSD 9

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I often use pkg_rmleaves(1) to uninstall unused programs on FreeBSD. I'm in the process of test-driving a FreeBSD 9 system on a virtual machine. I've noticed that pkg_rmleaves doesn't take up the entire width of the window

Re: FreeBSD 9 buildworld with clang failure

On 02.02.2012 15:12, ill...@gmail.com wrote: Might try: Commenting out CFLAGS= Setting NO_WERROR= in /etc/make.conf Removing the CFLAGS= line made no difference, after some searching for info about the NO_WERROR=, I went ahead and added the CFLAGS line back in added NO_WERROR= & WERROR= line

Re: FreeBSD 9 buildworld with clang failure

On 2 February 2012 14:43, Dean E. Weimer wrote: > I am trying to rebuild everything in a development machine with clang to > test for production, and ran into a problem on the buildworld process.  This > machine was already rebuilt from source using gcc, here are the options I > have set in make.c

FreeBSD 9 buildworld with clang failure

I am trying to rebuild everything in a development machine with clang to test for production, and ran into a problem on the buildworld process. This machine was already rebuilt from source using gcc, here are the options I have set in make.conf and src.conf. The lines I added to enable clang,

Re: FreeBSD 9 and 3G Modems

On 1/26/2012 12:00 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > I guess the internet.com in > AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\"IP\\\",\\\"internet.com \\\" OK \ > refer to the APN? I know I need to read ppp.conf again soon :) Hi, Yes, thats the APN. Your A

Re: FreeBSD 9 and 3G Modems

Odhiambo Washington writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 18:54, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> On 1/25/2012 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> > >> > I have a Huawei E1820 >> > >> > I will also try RTFM. >> >> Hi, >>kldload u3g >>kldload umodem >> > > Done, although kldload u3g tells m

Re: FreeBSD 9 and 3G Modems

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 19:12, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 1/26/2012 10:58 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > Hi, > >kldload u3g > >kldload umodem > > > > > > Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps > > because I booted up with my Huawei dongl

Re: FreeBSD 9 and 3G Modems

On 1/26/2012 10:58 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Hi, >kldload u3g >kldload umodem > > > Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps > because I booted up with my Huawei dongle plugged in. > kldstat | grep u3g shows me nothing though. Looks

  1   2   3   >