Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-10 Thread Nikola Pavlović
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:56:39PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: And that's just the way it is now. Try replicating the wealth of information you get in various config files in FreeBSD in a GUI. Just how hard it is to open a simple text file in an editor and just fracking do what it tells

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-09 Thread David Jackson
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/03/12 12:06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: Ubuntu,

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-09 Thread David Jackson
And that's just the way it is now. Try replicating the wealth of information you get in various config files in FreeBSD in a GUI. Just how hard it is to open a simple text file in an editor and just fracking do what it tells you to in comments?! And it's not just the base system, any

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-09 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/03/12 12:06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:

Re: sour grapes .. was FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-08 Thread Michael Cardell Widerkrantz
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws, 2012-01-01 20:30 (+0100): On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:41 PM, doug d...@fledge.watson.org wrote: That said, FreeBSD has a giant disadvantage in the desktop world. In trying to find if there will be any sort for my current laptop I came across a comment from Robert

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:55:04PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:07:36PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: Quoth Chad Perrin on Tuesday, 03 January 2012: So . . . please start with the denotative meanings of words, consider your audience, and use words accordingly. If

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:33:28PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:55:04PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:07:36PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: Quoth Chad Perrin on Tuesday, 03 January 2012: So . . . please start with the

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:17:55AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:16:30 -0600 (CST) Robert Bonomi articulated: He did *NOT* ask the prior poster to explain why it _would_be_ morally correct...HE demanded that they explain why it *IS* morally correct... quote Would you

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:50:45AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:33:28PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:55:04PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:07:36PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: Quoth Chad Perrin on Tuesday,

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias roque...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 08:50:45AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:33:28PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:55:04PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Tue,

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:00:12 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: You just ignored the salient point of what Robert Bonomi said, in favor of trivialities. If you prefer, pretend he said: HE asked that they explain why it *IS* morally correct... The point he was making is no less present and

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:02:23PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: Confuse and annoy people? Oh boy, confuse and annoy mature people is not so easy. Flame wars? I am not an adolescent, I have real problems in my life. Don't be stupid. On that ironic note, I will cease trying to

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:34:52PM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:00:12 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: You just ignored the salient point of what Robert Bonomi said, in favor of trivialities. If you prefer, pretend he said: HE asked that they explain why it *IS* morally

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Lyubomir Grigorov
Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the internet http://i.imgur.com/biopQ.gif -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Robert Bonomi
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:17:55AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:16:30 -0600 (CST) Robert Bonomi articulated: He did *NOT* ask the prior poster to explain why it _would_be_ morally correct...HE demanded that they explain why it *IS* morally correct... quote Would you

End of: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Al Plant
Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the internet http://i.imgur.com/biopQ.gif -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) ___

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 12:47:52PM -0800, Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, Note that there are more than one persons using the name Jerry. Where I might dip in to an argument a bit, especially if I see humor in it, I never

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:13:55 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: Serious Chad, I could not care less what you think. Why the heck did you ask for it, then? Fair enough, because in your post dated: On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26 -0700, you make this remark: I think the statement was more like Someone

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:16:15PM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:13:55 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: Why the heck did you ask for it, then? Fair enough, because in your post dated: On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26 -0700, you make this remark: I think the statement was more like

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Mario Lobo
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:47:52 Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the internet http://i.imgur.com/biopQ.gif -- Lyubomir Grigorov (bgalakazam) Yes! humor. I think open-sore

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Robert Bonomi
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 11:39:20 2012 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:34:52 -0500 From: Jerry je...@seibercom.net To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:00:12 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Michael Ross
Am 04.01.2012, 23:00 Uhr, schrieb Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br: On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:47:52 Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the internet http://i.imgur.com/biopQ.gif --

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:47:44 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:16:15PM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:13:55 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: Why the heck did you ask for it, then? Fair enough, because in your post dated: On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Da Rock
On 01/05/12 06:47, Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the internet http://i.imgur.com/biopQ.gif LOL ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Da Rock
On 01/05/12 08:25, Michael Ross wrote: Am 04.01.2012, 23:00 Uhr, schrieb Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br: On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:47:52 Lyubomir Grigorov wrote: Mainly to Jerry and Chad, but anyone contributing to the flame and OT fest, How I feel whenever I see people argue on the

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-04 Thread Da Rock
On 01/05/12 08:39, Jerry wrote: I have noticed that somehow you have managed to piss off at least two other posters in the past 48 hours. In every case, you claim to have been basically misunderstood. I wonder, could a pattern be emerging? And you, Jerry, have successfully managed to piss off a

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: New users are nearly always dismayed at the apparent difficulty of things, and should be warned that they will need to do some work under the hood in order to get what they want. The honesty can start immediately, it doesn't

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Da Rock
On 01/03/12 22:12, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: New users are nearly always dismayed at the apparent difficulty of things, and should be warned that they will need to do some work under the hood in order to get what they want. The

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Da Rock freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote: On 01/03/12 12:06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: Ubuntu, actually, has thrown out the baby with the bathwater.  In its zeal to make

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:46:54 -0600, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote: I would just like to add that is FreeBSD was so crappy open sour software, why does it run half the Internet? This must be a mistake. I was just assured this weekend that FreeBSD is a niche OS.

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:01:47AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:46:54 -0600, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote: I would just like to add that is FreeBSD was so crappy open sour software, why does it run half the Internet? This must be a mistake. I was just assured

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:01:47 -0600, Mark Felder wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:46:54 -0600, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote: I would just like to add that is FreeBSD was so crappy open sour software, why does it run half the Internet? This must be a mistake. I was just assured this

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:01:47 -0600, Mark Felder wrote: On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 08:46:54 -0600, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote: I would just like to add that is FreeBSD was so crappy open sour software, why does it run half

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Mark Felder
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:14:52 -0600, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote: Maybe consider the chance that a FreeBSD OS can be turned into closed source (which the license explicitely allows) and put into some embedded device, a router, a DSL modem, a managed switch... In parts like this, you won't

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Polytropon wrote: Maybe consider the chance that a FreeBSD OS can be turned into closed source (which the license explicitely allows) and put into some embedded device, a router, a DSL modem, a managed switch... In parts like this, you won't recognize FreeBSD anymore. If you consider such

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:06:11AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: Ubuntu, actually, has thrown out the baby with the bathwater. In its zeal to make things just work in a particular manner, it seems hell-bent on ignoring

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:12:11PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: New users are nearly always dismayed at the apparent difficulty of things, and should be warned that they will need to do some work under the hood in order

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 11:14:01AM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:12:11PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: New users are nearly always dismayed at the apparent difficulty of things, and should be warned

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Chip Camden
Quoth Chad Perrin on Tuesday, 03 January 2012: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:12:11PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: New users are nearly always dismayed at the apparent difficulty of things, and should be warned that they

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:33:20 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: Now you have really peaked my interest. On any given day, on a Windows based forum, the terms: FreePiss, open-sore, Lsuck etcetera are freely thrown around. On Linux based forums, terms like: Winblows, Microsucks, etcetera are

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Jeffrey McFadden
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 12:33:20 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: Now you have really peaked Piqued. Although it is misused here.

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Robert Bonomi
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote: Chad Perrin articulated: Now you have really peaked my interest. On any given day, on a Windows based forum, the terms: FreePiss, open-sore, Lsuck etcetera are freely thrown around. On Linux based forums, terms like: Winblows, Microsucks, etcetera

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Kevin Zheng
Jerry, FreeBSD Questions isn't the place to argue about how all OSes should use a universal API, and how Ubuntu is doing such a good job. In an ideal world, everyone would speak the same language, use the same currency, and have identical power outlets. Unfortunately, the last time I checked, we

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:07:36PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: Quoth Chad Perrin on Tuesday, 03 January 2012: So . . . please start with the denotative meanings of words, consider your audience, and use words accordingly. If you wish to use a term differently than how it is understood,

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 11:55:26PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:14:20AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:56:45 +1000 Da Rock articulated: If you want to verify, then by all means parouse this list and others (even in the linux community) over the past

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:14:20AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:56:45 +1000 Da Rock articulated: If you want to verify, then by all means parouse this list and others (even in the linux community) over the past

Re: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread sykadul
Ladies and gentleman, I will be unplugged from my email until the 17th of January. In the mean time here's a video of a bunny opening your mail http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMyaRmTwdKs Your mail will not be forwarded and I will contact you when I come back, alternatively you can contact one

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Da Rock
On 01/02/12 23:31, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:14:20AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:56:45 +1000 Da Rock articulated: If you want to verify, then by all means parouse this list and others (even in the linux

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Joe Gain
Jerry, What you're saying is that, 'you guys think that FreeBSD is a great desktop workstation, but it's not and anyone who says it is, is wrong. Anyone who says FreeBSD's not a great workstation because it doesn't have some particular feature is right and any discussion which questions the value

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 08:31:14AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 23:55:26 -0700 Chad Perrin articulated: On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:14:20AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:56:45 +1000 Da Rock articulated: If you want to verify, then by all means parouse this list

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Nikola Pavlović
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:32:17PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: An OS should strive to be a better platform for many people, including techies and non-techies. A good software design philosophy is that good software works out of the box without configuration using reasonable defaults, but,

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Nikola Pavlović
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:59:20PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: FreeBSD is very well documented! I guess a lot of people can't cope with how structured and professional it is. They are used to chaos, fear, uncertainty and doubt and feel comfortable that way. My experience is that

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Mario Lobo
On Monday 02 January 2012 18:42:44 Nikola Pavlović wrote: On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:32:17PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: [troll snipper] . perhaps could be a porting of the IOKit driver system from Darwin, perhaps even allowing Darwin drivers to be used on FreeBSD. All of this can go

Re: Waay OT Now... FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Da Rock
On 01/03/12 08:10, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 02 January 2012 18:42:44 Nikola Pavlović wrote: On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:32:17PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: [troll snipper] . perhaps could be a porting of the IOKit driver system from Darwin, perhaps even allowing Darwin drivers to be

Re: Waay OT Now... FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Mario Lobo
On Monday 02 January 2012 20:25:22 Da Rock wrote: On 01/03/12 08:10, Mario Lobo wrote: On Monday 02 January 2012 18:42:44 Nikola Pavlović wrote: On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:32:17PM -0500, David Jackson wrote: [troll snipper] . perhaps could be a porting of the IOKit driver system

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Walter Alejandro Iglesias
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: Ubuntu, actually, has thrown out the baby with the bathwater. In its zeal to make things just work in a particular manner, it seems hell-bent on ignoring all but one way to do things, even as it tries to dominate its entire market

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-02 Thread Da Rock
On 01/03/12 12:06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 12:33:20PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote: Ubuntu, actually, has thrown out the baby with the bathwater. In its zeal to make things just work in a particular manner, it seems hell-bent on ignoring all but one way to do

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 09:03:38 +1000 Da Rock articulated: Mac doesn't support all hardware from what I understand, and the only system with 100% hardware support is Winblows. Given the design philosophy of Winblows, how well written do you think the hardware drivers are coded? For that

Re: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread sykadul
Ladies and gentleman, I will be unplugged from my email until the 17th of January. In the mean time here's a video of a bunny opening your mail http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMyaRmTwdKs Your mail will not be forwarded and I will contact you when I come back, alternatively you can contact one

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread Da Rock
On 01/01/12 21:42, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 09:03:38 +1000 Da Rock articulated: Mac doesn't support all hardware from what I understand, and the only system with 100% hardware support is Winblows. Given the design philosophy of Winblows, how well written do you think the hardware

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:56:45 +1000 Da Rock articulated: On 01/01/12 21:42, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 09:03:38 +1000 Da Rock articulated: Mac doesn't support all hardware from what I understand, and the only system with 100% hardware support is Winblows. Given the design

Re: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread sykadul
Ladies and gentleman, I will be unplugged from my email until the 17th of January. In the mean time here's a video of a bunny opening your mail http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMyaRmTwdKs Your mail will not be forwarded and I will contact you when I come back, alternatively you can contact one

Re: sour grapes .. was FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread doug
I wish someone with some FreeBSD weight would make this request, but I think this thread got a little off topic. The main thrust of the FreeBSD project seems to be making the best server OS possible. That I think they do that pretty well. I have long held that to be viable long term in the

Re: sour grapes .. was FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread Jeffrey McFadden
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:41 PM, doug d...@fledge.watson.org wrote: I wish someone with some FreeBSD weight would make this request, but I think this thread got a little off topic. Oh buddy... The main thrust of the FreeBSD project seems to be making the best server OS possible. That I

Re: sour grapes .. was FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 7:41 PM, doug d...@fledge.watson.org wrote: That said, FreeBSD has a giant disadvantage in the desktop world. In trying to find if there will be any sort for my current laptop I came across a comment from Robert Noland saying that Xorg is becoming more and more Linux

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2012-01-01 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 09:14:20AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:56:45 +1000 Da Rock articulated: If you want to verify, then by all means parouse this list and others (even in the linux community) over the past _five_ (thats 5) years. I am not sure what parouse means.

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-31 Thread Joe Gain
Writers who rely on ideological positions such as (socialism || fascism || jedi-knight == good | bad) really need to go visit a social science mailing list. It's not like political/ religious mailing lists don't exist. My positivist take on things: 1. Nobody is stopping anybody from changing

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-31 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 12/31/2011 01:02 PM, Joe Gain wrote: Writers who rely on ideological positions such as (socialism || fascism || jedi-knight == good | bad) really need to go visit a social science mailing list. It's not like political/ religious mailing lists don't exist. My positivist take on things: 1.

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-31 Thread David Jackson
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Bas Smeelen b.smee...@ose.nl wrote: On 12/31/2011 01:02 PM, Joe Gain wrote: Writers who rely on ideological positions such as (socialism || fascism || jedi-knight == good | bad) really need to go visit a social science mailing list. It's not like political/

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-31 Thread David Jackson
An OS should strive to be a better platform for many people, including techies and non-techies. A good software design philosophy is that good software works out of the box without configuration using reasonable defaults, but, that that the software should be flexible, very configurable, the

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-31 Thread Da Rock
On 01/01/12 06:32, David Jackson wrote: An OS should strive to be a better platform for many people, including techies and non-techies. A good software design philosophy is that good software works out of the box without configuration using reasonable defaults, but, that that the software

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Da Rock
On 12/30/11 16:39, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:43:16 -0500, David Jackson wrote: However, My finding is that due to poor documentation, [...] That kind of statement doesn't fit well to FreeBSD which is known for its excellent documentation, often considered superior to other open

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 30/12/2011 11:52, Da Rock wrote: I haven't looked, but it would be good to have some irc channels handled by the team though. http://wiki.freebsd.org/IrcChannels Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:39:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: However, there are differences in how you judge documentation to be _good_. Talk to a mainframer, and he will tell you a different story. Then talk to a Windows person and explain what documentation is, and he'll tell you that you

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Da Rock
On 12/30/11 22:15, Jerry wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:39:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: However, there are differences in how you judge documentation to be _good_. Talk to a mainframer, and he will tell you a different story. Then talk to a Windows person and explain what documentation is,

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Da Rock
On 12/30/11 22:11, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 30/12/2011 11:52, Da Rock wrote: I haven't looked, but it would be good to have some irc channels handled by the team though. http://wiki.freebsd.org/IrcChannels Ha! There you go... I've only just been finding out about the value of irc in the

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:15:00 -0500, Jerry wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:39:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: However, there are differences in how you judge documentation to be _good_. Talk to a mainframer, and he will tell you a different story. Then talk to a Windows person and explain

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:35:46 +1000 Da Rock articulated: Was this really necessary to post to the list? Publicly? Opinions are your own, but this does appear rather vindictive and not really wanted on a friendly list. For reference Polytropon has been rather helpful many times on this list

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 08:05:10 -0500, Jerry wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:35:46 +1000 Da Rock articulated: Was this really necessary to post to the list? Publicly? Opinions are your own, but this does appear rather vindictive and not really wanted on a friendly list. For reference

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Da Rock
On 12/30/11 23:05, Jerry wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:35:46 +1000 Da Rock articulated: Was this really necessary to post to the list? Publicly? Opinions are your own, but this does appear rather vindictive and not really wanted on a friendly list. For reference Polytropon has been rather

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Jerry
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:22:30 +0100 Polytropon articulated: From man iwn: Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965/1000/5000/5150/5300/6000/6050 IEEE 802.11n driver So they actually got support for one such device. I refer you to

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread David Jackson
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.comwrote: From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Dec 29 21:46:36 2011 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:43:16 -0500 From: David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Kernel

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Jason Lenthe
On 12/30/11 09:59, Jerry wrote: If FreeBSD really wanted to make a quality product they would hire competent programmers to create the drivers, etcetera that are seriously needed. They do. See this for a list of FreeBSD Foundation funded projects that have been completed:

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:59:14 -0500, Jerry wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:22:30 +0100 Polytropon articulated: From man iwn: Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965/1000/5000/5150/5300/6000/6050 IEEE 802.11n driver So they actually got support for one such device. I refer you to

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:22:31 -0500, David Jackson wrote: Of course, those best able to document are those who wrote it in the first place, since they already know how it works. A fact seems to be: Modern programmers don't bother with documenting, or coding guidelines, or style or other things

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread doug
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:22:31 -0500, David Jackson wrote: Of course, those best able to document are those who wrote it in the first place, since they already know how it works. A fact seems to be: Modern programmers don't bother with documenting, or

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread David Jackson
Again, as we did discuss (and agree upon) before, supporting FreeBSD is not in the scope of hardware manufacturers. Supporting more than the platform they get aliments for simply wouldn't pay. The unit sales for _this_ world of IT are simply to low to justify the work. That is the chicken

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:56:59 -0500, David Jackson wrote: Again, as we did discuss (and agree upon) before, supporting FreeBSD is not in the scope of hardware manufacturers. Supporting more than the platform they get aliments for simply wouldn't pay. The unit sales for _this_ world of

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-30 Thread Robert Bonomi
David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrte: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.comwrote: David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com wrte: ... However, My finding is that due to poor documentation, ... [ sneck remaineder of ill-informed trolling ] Start with The Design and Implementation

FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-29 Thread David Jackson
I have had an interest in studying the FreeBSD kernel and getting to know its internals better. After all, in Open source projects, they say, community contributions are important. However, My finding is that due to poor documentation, the FreeBSD kernel is nearly impenetrable to an outsider. I

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-29 Thread Robert Bonomi
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Dec 29 21:46:36 2011 Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:43:16 -0500 From: David Jackson djackson...@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation I have had an interest in studying the FreeBSD kernel

Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation

2011-12-29 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:43:16 -0500, David Jackson wrote: However, My finding is that due to poor documentation, [...] That kind of statement doesn't fit well to FreeBSD which is known for its excellent documentation, often considered superior to other open source projects. [...] the FreeBSD