Re: FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS server]

2005-03-03 Thread Shawn C Lander
activity when the webserver is fetching a recently changed file, or is it working entirely from its own cache? Any reply to this should go to the sender and to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get the reply back on the list. - Bob Original Message Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS

Re: FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS server]

2005-03-03 Thread Dan Nelson
the relationship between vfs.nfs.access_cache_timeout and the ag{reg,dir}{min,max} mount_nfs flags. Original Message Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS server Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:55:24 -0600 From: Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED

FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS server

2005-03-02 Thread Bob Johnson
Message below is about a FreeBSD server I maintain. The FreeBSD server is our web server. We use NFS to talk to a Netware file server where most of our users' web pages are stored. FreeBSD is 5.3, and was working ok with Netware 5.1 (and still is with other Netware servers). One of the

Re: FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS server

2005-03-02 Thread Bob Johnson
Bob Johnson wrote: As explained in the message below, a trace of the NFS server activity shows that the FreeBSD client implements ls -l as a series of ACCESS operations (whatever that is) followed by an FS STAT, while a Solaris client does a series of GET ATTR operations (those are the Netware

Re: FreeBSD NFS client and Netware 6.5 NFS server

2005-03-02 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 02), Bob Johnson said: Message below is about a FreeBSD server I maintain. The FreeBSD server is our web server. We use NFS to talk to a Netware file server where most of our users' web pages are stored. FreeBSD is 5.3, and was working ok with Netware 5.1 (and still