Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread James Phillips
--- On Thu, 8/6/09, freebsd-questions-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: > > Message: 16 > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:41:12 -0500 > From: Neal Hogan > Subject: Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2 >     overwrites partitions) > To: Mark Stapper

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Hogan
> inspired by a guy (the OP) who has been using fBSD for many >> years >> (over 5 . . . I can't remember the exact number). >> > > I have been struggling to use FreeBSD for a shorter amount of time (for a > fileserver). I was originally attracted to OpenBSD "for security." However, > OpenBSD user

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread James Phillips
--- On Thu, 8/6/09, Neal Hogan wrote: > > So, this long story boils down to the following > question: > > > > What is that best way to use the handbook and related > documentation (like man-pages)? > > > > What?! > > Ummm . . . read them. I'm not trying to be too big of a > dick, but your >

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Hogan
>> How do you expect to get comfortable w/out "playing >> around," other >> than, I guess (a'la above) reading the documentation? >> > > Put another way: I want a reliable, backed-up file-server before playing > around on my "workstation" that would be a separate computer. > > I want to build myse

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Manolis Kiagias
James Phillips wrote: > Put another way: I want a reliable, backed-up file-server before playing > around on my "workstation" that would be a separate computer. > > I want to build myself a "sand-box" so I don't have to worry about breaking > stuff that is unrelated. > > Another way of asking the

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:56:41 -0700 (PDT), James Phillips wrote: > I was also attracted to BSD because I knew from my brief stint at > university that the BSD man-pages were actually kept up to date. As a developer, documentation is VERY important to me. That's why I love FreeBSD, because the OS a

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:41:40 -0700 (PDT), James Phillips wrote: > Put another way: I want a reliable, backed-up file-server before > playing around on my "workstation" that would be a separate > computer. The default installation of FreeBSD covers most cases. > I want to build myself a "sand-b

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:09:51 +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Windows experience won't help much - mainly due to the fact Windows > forces the users (and admins) to a completely different way of thinking > than FreeBSD. That's true. It's even hard to communicate with "'Windows' admins" because of

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Daniel Underwood
> Once taken the time to set things up, they make you happy running for > a lifetime. :-) Amen. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Modulok
[snip] > Once taken the time to set things up, they make you happy running for > a lifetime. :-) [/snip] It's nice to be able to go on vacation, without worrying about the servers back home craping out :) -Modulok- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-06 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:25:38PM -0600, Modulok wrote: > [snip] > > Once taken the time to set things up, they make you happy running for > > a lifetime. :-) > [/snip] > > It's nice to be able to go on vacation, without worrying about the > servers back home craping out :) > > -Modulok-

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-07 Thread Polytropon
I'm obviously getting more and more stupid. On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 02:04:16 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > To conform with the growisofs manual, you could symlink it to /dev/dvd > using the setting > > linkacd0cdrom > > in /etc/devfs.conf. Wrong line copies. Should be: link

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-07 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:25:38 -0600, Modulok wrote: > It's nice to be able to go on vacation, without worrying about the > servers back home craping out :) Vacation? Weekend! :-) -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-07 Thread James Phillips
-list archives? This list is probably best suited to very specific questions. Some the stuff I mentioned has little to do with BSD. --- On Thu, 8/6/09, Polytropon wrote: > From: Polytropon > Subject: Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2 > To: "James Ph

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2

2009-08-07 Thread James Phillips
--- On Fri, 8/7/09, freebsd-questions-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 02:04:16 +0200 > From: Polytropon > On Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:09:51 +0300, Manolis Kiagias > wrote: > > Windows experience won't help much - mainly due to the > fact Windows > > forces the us

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-08 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:56:41PM -0700, James Phillips wrote: > > I was also attracted to BSD because I knew from my brief stint at > university that the BSD man-pages were actually kept up to date. Not > like the GNU system where man pages say stupid things like: "The full > documentation for d

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-08 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:46:00 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > Yeah, I hate that stuff. The GNU project is kind of like the Microsoft > of the open source community, that way. Be happy that there at least is an info manual. In many cases, there is NO local documentation, neither in man or info format.

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2

2009-08-08 Thread James Phillips
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, freebsd-questions-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: > > Message: 11 > Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:46:00 -0600 > From: Chad Perrin > Subject: Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > > upgrade 7.2 > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:56:41PM -0

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-09 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:46:00 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > Yeah, I hate that stuff. The GNU project is kind of like the Microsoft > > of the open source community, that way. > > Be happy that there at least is an info manual. In many c

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2

2009-08-09 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 10:09:30PM -0700, James Phillips wrote: > > Okay, after reading this, I used the "WayBack Machine" to review the > printing section of the April 17, 2006 version of the Handbook. > > I was not able to find anything that is writing a print-driver per-se. > In the "Advanced"

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-09 Thread Charlie Kester
On Sun 09 Aug 2009 at 06:52:31 PDT Chad Perrin wrote: An info page is almost as bad as nothing, as far as I'm concerned. The GNU project has this bizarre idea that everybody in the world should use everything it produces and *nothing else*, no matter how painful it all is to use -- and assumes

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-10 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 07:52:31AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 07:55:18PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:46:00 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote: > > > Yeah, I hate that stuff. The GNU project is kind of like the Microsoft > > > of the open source community, th

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: > upgrade 7.2

2009-08-11 Thread Karl Vogel
>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 07:52:31 -0600, >> Chad Perrin said: C> An info page is almost as bad as nothing, as far as I'm concerned. Yup. However, the GNU folks do provide something for the rest of us; help2man accepts a GNU program name, runs it with the --help and --version arguments, a

FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2 overwrites partitions)

2009-08-06 Thread Mark Stapper
> > > Many people's only familiarity with computers in general will be from a > Windows centric perspective. Somehow there is a tendency to believe that > inserting a CD, booting, and then proceeding to click "OK" in a dialog box a > few dozen times makes them some kind of expert when they succe

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2 overwrites partitions)

2009-08-06 Thread Jonathan McKeown
On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:43:47 Mark Stapper wrote: > > In light of this, I would really enjoy seeing a "Ubuntu" like movement > in the FreeBSD corner. > What I mean is that it would be nice for my mother to install and use > FreeBSD. [snip] > To achieve this, there are two things that should b

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2 overwrites partitions)

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Hogan
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote: > On Thursday 06 August 2009 09:43:47 Mark Stapper wrote: >> >> In light of this, I would really enjoy seeing a "Ubuntu" like movement >> in the FreeBSD corner. >> What I mean is that it would be nice for my mother to install and use >> FreeBS

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2 overwrites partitions)

2009-08-06 Thread Neal Hogan
> In light of this, I would really enjoy seeing a "Ubuntu" like movement > in the FreeBSD corner. > What I mean is that it would be nice for my mother to install and use > FreeBSD. > I am not saying that a Windows user should be able to feel right at home > on a box running FreeBSD, but a computer

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2 overwrites partitions)

2009-08-06 Thread Modulok
[snip] > In light of this, I would really enjoy seeing a "Ubuntu" like movement > in the FreeBSD corner. > What I mean is that it would be nice for my mother to install and use > FreeBSD. > I am not saying that a Windows user should be able to feel right at home > on a box running FreeBSD, but a co

Re: FreeBSD for the common man(or woman) (was: upgrade 7.2 overwrites partitions)

2009-08-06 Thread Polytropon
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:56:59 +0200, Jonathan McKeown wrote: > PC-BSD is FreeBSD, pre-packaged with a usable desktop and its own simplified > package manager. If you're talking about PBI, that's what the "average user" expects: You open a web browser (d'oh), search for what you think will be the s