Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-03-26 Thread alexus
I appreciate everyone's input on this matter and the bottom line is: mod_php and/or php-fpm should be created as a _separate_package_ for users who have no need for it, should _NOT_ install it in fact if this package exists or not it shouldn't even concern you (since you not using it) for users

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-11 Thread František Farka
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:14:30 +0100 Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: On 1/10/12 4:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: [...] Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who don't even *use*

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled package you got used. While many people want PHP in the

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peterfb...@peterk.org wrote: I created a jail and within a jail I did pkg_add -r apache22 pkg_add -r php5 now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote: Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peterfb...@peterk.org  wrote: I created a jail and within a jail I did pkg_add

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 22:52, alexus ale...@gmail.com wrote: I created a jail and within a jail I did pkg_add -r apache22 pkg_add -r php5 now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php, I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22 `grep php

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled package you

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 1/10/12 3:09 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:09 AM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote: Op 9-1-2012 21:02, alexus schreef: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peterfb...@peterk.org wrote: I

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: [...] Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache module* just because they installed PHP. A possible alternative that would

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef: On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? The PHP maintainer decides the default options,

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Dick Hoogendijk
Op 10-1-2012 15:32, Damien Fleuriot schreef: A possible alternative that would keep everyone happy would be *another* package that actually includes the module, like for example a package called mod_php5, it would install the stuff from php5 + the apache module. That is the way CentOS

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 1/10/12 4:34 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: [...] Mine is, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to Dick, that people who don't even *use* apache shouldn't get stuck with a *useless apache module* just because they

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-10 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 1/10/12 5:01 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef: On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? The

FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-09 Thread alexus
I created a jail and within a jail I did pkg_add -r apache22 pkg_add -r php5 now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php, I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22 -- http://alexus.org/ ___

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-09 Thread Peter
I created a jail and within a jail I did pkg_add -r apache22 pkg_add -r php5 now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php, I see source code... I dont think php5 added inside of apache22 -- http://alexus.org/ I don't think the package has the apache module by

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-09 Thread alexus
there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: I created a jail and within a jail I did pkg_add -r apache22 pkg_add -r php5 now I have apache and php, but whenever I'm trying to hit phpinfo.php, I see

Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP

2012-01-09 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form of an Apache module, other folks use it