Gnome port

2006-02-05 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On Friday I came across a gimp script-fu which would slice an image into pieces and output html that rendered the complete image as a table. But it was written in

RE: Gnome port

2006-02-05 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 05-Feb-2006 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On Friday I came across a gimp script-fu which would slice an image into pieces and output html that rendered the

Re: Gnome port

2006-02-05 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 02:54:07PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: On 05-Feb-2006 Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: Is there a reason that the gnome 2 ports don't use the conflicts mechanism to avoid completely hosing an existing gnome 2 install? On [snip] Let me be more clear because I'm

Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Wes Santee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Greetings, I run Apache 1.3+ssl on a computer that I'm installing Gnome 2.12.2 via the meta-port in x11/gnome2. As part of that install, it builds and installs www/gnome-user-share. *That* port forces the www/apache20 port upon me. Since my

Re: Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Michael C. Shultz
, -Wes The only gnome port I can find that as that port as a dependency is x11/gnome2-power-tools, not x11/gnome2. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any

Re: Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Wes Santee
and |installs www/gnome-user-share. *That* port forces the www/apache20 port |upon me. |[snip] | | The only gnome port I can find that as that port as a dependency is | x11/gnome2-power-tools, not x11/gnome2. | | -Mike You're right. Originally when I installed Gnome2, I used the gnome2-lite meta-port

Re: Gnome port forcing Apache 2.0 on me during install

2005-12-15 Thread Michael C. Shultz
and |installs www/gnome-user-share. *That* port forces the www/apache20 port |upon me. |[snip] | | The only gnome port I can find that as that port as a dependency is | x11/gnome2-power-tools, not x11/gnome2. | | -Mike You're right. Originally when I installed Gnome2, I used the gnome2-lite

Problem with xscreensaver-gnome port

2004-05-26 Thread Jesse Sheidlower
I recently tried to update my xscreensaver-gnome port from 4.15_2 to 4.16. After the usual amount of churning, it died with the following error: --- In file included from phosphor.c:34: /usr/local/include/util.h:95: error: syntax error before '/' token In file included from phosphor.c:34: /usr

Gnome port build failure

2003-02-13 Thread stan
New install last night, cvsup'd main and ports did make world, and now I'm trying to build /usr/ports/x11-gnome. It dies in /usr/ports/lang/librep trying to run the repdoc command it just built, which segfaults. Sugestiosn? -- They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety