On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:00:44 -0400, Stephen Cook wrote:
On 4/1/2013 5:23 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
Actually, I forwarded a message that Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com posted
to -jail and -ports. Proper attribution is what this issue's all about.
It's been pointed out to me privately that cross-posting
...@erdgeist.org
Cc: po...@freebsd.org, freebsd-j...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:qjail fork attribution was Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available
for critique
Dirk Engling wrote:
Dear JoeB,
since you just threatened me via private email to expose my evil plans
of preventing your ubercool project from
On 4/1/2013 5:23 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
One does not have to be a lawyer to know the lack of any license verbiage
embedded in computer programs released to the public becomes property of public
domain forever. Putting license verbiage on your next port version is
unenforceable because it's already
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:21:29 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
[.. also chopping mercilessly ..]
# Copyright 2010, Qjail project. All rights reserved.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:21:29 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
[...]
mentioned anywhere in
Subject: Re: Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique
Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
On 18.03.13 20:16, s...@tormail.org wrote:
to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezjail is a much
better
solution. I also see that you
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
On 18.03.13 20:16, s...@tormail.org wrote:
to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezjail is a much better
solution. I also see that you are the maintainer/author of qjail and like
to shovel your opinion as the only
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100, Dirk Engling wrote:
On 18.03.13 20:16, s...@tormail.org wrote:
to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezjail is a much better
solution. I also see that you are the
useful doc，greate job！
find a mybe copy/past mistake in 16.7.1：
*exec.stop* This is the normal script used to *start *the jail.
should be：
*exec.stop* This is the normal script used to *stop *the jail.
regards,
2013/3/19 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com
To all interested parties;
I have
To all interested parties;
I have completed the final draft of the total rewrite of FreeBSD's
handbook Chapter 16 on Jails.
Before submitting my work for submission to the documentation group for
insertion in the handbook I am looking for critique of the work to find
errors in concept,
Pretty heavy cross-posting here, could you perhaps reign this in to the
freebsd-jail@ list, where it can be discussed in-context? This will help keep
the noise down.
On Mar 18, 2013, at 12:57 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
To all interested parties;
I have completed the final draft of the total rewrite
Isaac (.ike) Levy writes:
Pretty heavy cross-posting here, could you perhaps reign this in
to the freebsd-jail@ list, where it can be discussed in-context?
This will help keep the noise down.
It will also keep down the signal from people who use or are
interested in jails, but do
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Isaac (.ike) Levy writes:
Pretty heavy cross-posting here, could you perhaps reign this in
to the freebsd-jail@ list, where it can be discussed in-context?
This will help keep the noise down.
It will also
13 matches
Mail list logo
