Hi--
On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> This is along the lines of what I was thinking. I am my own CA and can
> generate certs that no one else has the private keys to.
So can someone who does not run their own CA...?
> The problem with buying certs from a provider is the go
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:16:32 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many
> >>> think it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true;
> >>> it just takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> [snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 h
Michael Powell wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you simply
>>> referring to weak keys?
>>
>> I would also like to specifically if it's for weak keys or are all
>> WPA2 personal keys crackable by brute force. Also is WPA2 Enterprise
>> as weak also. Could a
Arthur Chance wrote:
[snip]
>> What I was pondering is some form of L2TP tunnel, or some other form of
>> IPSEC tunnel to form some kind of VPN like communication between the
>> client and the wifi. Just never have begun to find the time to get
>> anywhere with the idea. But basically it would res
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
>>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
>>> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
>>> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
>>
>> Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be crack
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:04 PM, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
> Michael Powell wrote:
>
>
>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
>> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
>> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as litt
On 04/22/13 21:49, Michael Powell wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Powell
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of
protection that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out
script
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
Are you saying that any WPA
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Powell
> wrote:
>> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of
protection that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out
script kiddies and peo
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
>>> that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out script
>>> kiddies and people who don't have skill, but peopl
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
>> that is truly necessary in this modern day. You can keep out script
>> kiddies and people who don't have skill, but people who know what they
>> are doing are only slowed down.
>>
>
>
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell
>> wrote:
>>> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>>
Hi,
[...]
> Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
> that is truly necessary
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell
> wrote:
>> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
>>> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
>>
>> Not sure what you mean by 'c
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
>> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
>
> Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you are meaning tha
Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you are meaning that someone is
using aircrack-ng to break your Wifi authentication
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
> crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
>
> I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
> $300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
> Hacom offer
Hi Alejandro. I can't speak about Hacom, but I've had excellent
results with Soekris hardware. It'll run all sorts of FreeBSD-based
systems. They have kit suitable for both wired and wireless networks.
--
James.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
$300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
Hacom offers this. Can any
19 matches
Mail list logo
