Hello!
Polytropon schrieb:
Hi!
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:40:54 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb:
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90).
Mayve the SANE team will get this scanner to work later on.
But at this point
Hi!
Seems that the CanoScan LiDe 90 is one of the scanners built by
Canon that are not supported well. That's a reason to avoid them. :-)
I had similar issues with a LiDE 45 (I think it was), and I did
soon replace it with a SCSI scanner that worked out of the box
without problems.
On Sun, 14 Sep
Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb:
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90). It is at least detected by
# sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1900
[CanoScan], chip=GL842) at libusb:/dev/usb1:/dev/ugen0
- No /dev/uscanner0 is prod
Hello list,
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90). It is at least detected by
# sane-find-scanner -q
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x1900
[CanoScan], chip=GL842) at libusb:/dev/usb1:/dev/ugen0
- No /dev/uscanner0 is produced.
- # scanim
