== Polytropon wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 14:22:45 +0200 ==
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > I always keep saying the ideal
> > situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own
> > really mission critical software and freely mix that with installin
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> I always keep saying the ideal
> situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own
> really mission critical software and freely mix that with installing
> pre-compiled packages of anything else from the public reposito
On 20/08/2012 04:07, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Polytropon" == Polytropon writes:
>
>
> Polytropon> I just assume providing packages for every imaginable
> Polytropon> combination requires lots of resources. As an example
> Polytropon> take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integr
> "Polytropon" == Polytropon writes:
Polytropon> I just assume providing packages for every imaginable
Polytropon> combination requires lots of resources. As an example
Polytropon> take OpenOffice: Every language variant, then integration
Polytropon> with KDE, Gnome, or none of them, and pr
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:27:54PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 23:27:54 +0200
> From: Polytropon
> Subject: Re: I Can Has Packages?
> To: vermaden
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2)
>
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:54:52 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> "Polytropon" :
> > On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> > > HI,
> > >
> > > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> > > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
> > > package for LAME the same way as Ope
... I even got a screenshot of how these *flavours*
and *subpackages* work, here:
http://ompldr.org/vZjV2bQ
"Polytropon" pisze:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can
Hai ;)
"Polytropon" :
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> > OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> > for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
> > package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
>
> j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^=
>
> Packages
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:33:49 +0200, vermaden wrote:
> HI,
>
> OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
> for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
> package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
j00 CAN haz pakagez. =^_^=
Packages for _everything_ is impossible because of th
HI,
OpenBSD seems to have packages for everything, even
for LAME (audio/lame), why FreeBSD can not provide
package for LAME the same way as OpenBSD does?
Regards,
vermaden
--
...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
10 matches
Mail list logo