On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 18:20:01 +0530
"SethuRaman Krishnasamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to know if IPSec-NATT setup can
> be made using racoon2 and the procedure for the same. I'm using
> racoon2 version racoon2-20061228a
AFAIK, you need IPSEC_NATT support in the kernel. search the
Hello!
I could setup IPSec communication between two Peers in different
network through NAT router using racoon-IKEv1. Now I would llike to
set up IPSec communication between the peers using racoon2-IKEv2. The
documentation of racoon2 doesnt describe the procedure to configure
NAT-T parameters
Hi all,
I currently have an issue of how "open" the whole WiFi tends to be, so,
as all good people should do, I've started implementing a IPSec
encryption system rather than the rather disappointing WEP.
I'm encrypting all data to and from the gateway, which isn't a problem.
This was documented r
The short answer to your question is yes. I don't use NATD I use IPNAT
but I am sure the theories are the same. I found that the challenge was
to get the port forwarding right. It also makes using dynamic addresses
internally a challenge but I cheated and used statics instead.
Then again after re
Is it possible for FBSD's nat daemon to route IPSEC traffic properly? What I am trying
to do is use my FBSD gateway that already NAT's my dsl connection to allow me to use a
IPSEC VPN client to connect to my company's network. I have been through the howto's,
and forums, but I am not certain tha
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 04:54:33PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have often wondered about this..
> Surely there must be a way to do it.
Actually, I guess not, they're working on this problem at IETF. Maybe you
could look at this inetrnet-drafts:
draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-02.t
I have often wondered about this..
Surely there must be a way to do it.
-D
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Spreng [mailto:spreng@;insomniac.ch]
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:09 AM
> To: Charles Henrich
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: IPSEC/NAT issues
&
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:15:24AM -0700, Charles Henrich wrote:
> I have a network/firewall where I want to nat an entire network. However, I
> also want nat traffic to one remote host in particular out on the internet to
> be IPsec'd as well.
>
> [A] (10.x) [B] (Nat) [C] (Real IP)
>
> I've set
I have a network/firewall where I want to nat an entire network. However, I
also want nat traffic to one remote host in particular out on the internet to
be IPsec'd as well.
[A] (10.x) [B] (Nat) [C] (Real IP)
I've setup IPsec on both machines, and from either machine (B,C) I can ssh to
the other
