Christian Barthel writes:
> > Current system is 8.2-STABLE/amd64. Should I better re-install
> > everything (Intel Core2 4300 1.80GHz / 1799.81-MHz K8-class CPU
> > here, and 2 GB RAM, that's why the AMD64 choice) and use i386
> > instead?
>
> I don't understand why you have chosen AMD64? Y
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Christian Barthel
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:27:08PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>> Current system is 8.2-STABLE/amd64. Should I better re-install
>> everything (Intel Core2 4300 1.80GHz / 1799.81-MHz K8-class CPU
>> here, and 2 GB RAM, that's why the AMD64
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:04:53 +1000, Ashley Williams wrote:
> >> I've done some research and found lots of posts several years
> >> old that suggest that using wine on AMD64 is not possible or
> >> requires binary packages that don't exist, and even if one can
> >> install it, it doesn't run.
> >>
>
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:37:06 +0200, Christian Barthel wrote:
> I don't understand why you have chosen AMD64? You only have 2 GB memory,
> which can be adressed under i386 too and you can avoid a lot of
> problems.
Reason: The i386 platform is obsoleted, and there will be
less and less targets to
>> I've done some research and found lots of posts several years
>> old that suggest that using wine on AMD64 is not possible or
>> requires binary packages that don't exist, and even if one can
>> install it, it doesn't run.
>>
>> Has this situation improved meanwhile? Does anyone have a
>> recipe
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:27:08PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> In order to restore functionality that my old system provided
> almost 10 years ago (I checked when I bought it!), I'm currently
> trying to get wine working. Sadly, its Makefile states:
>
> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386
>
> I've done some
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:42:04 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> There is someone who makes packages for wine on amd64. See
> http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/wine/
Thanks, this did help. I was able to install this package,
but then had to manually install wine-gecko. After changing
$PACKAGESITE to the
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 15:32:54 -0500, Andre Goree wrote:
> This worked out for me when I was in the same predicament a few days
> ago: http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64
Thank you, I've just rriet it. Pre-installation tasks are easy
(implied that I did everything correctly), but then, make and
p
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:27:08PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> In order to restore functionality that my old system provided
> almost 10 years ago (I checked when I bought it!), I'm currently
> trying to get wine working. Sadly, its Makefile states:
>
> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386
>
> I've done some
On 08/14/2011 15:27, Polytropon wrote:
In order to restore functionality that my old system provided
almost 10 years ago (I checked when I bought it!), I'm currently
trying to get wine working. Sadly, its Makefile states:
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386
I've done some research and found lots of pos
In order to restore functionality that my old system provided
almost 10 years ago (I checked when I bought it!), I'm currently
trying to get wine working. Sadly, its Makefile states:
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386
I've done some research and found lots of posts several years
old that suggest that us
11 matches
Mail list logo
