>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
>> Bill Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest
stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
>> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>>
>>
What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
>>>
>>> I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
>>>
>>> Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
This is on an old 4.11 system updated to l
John Webster wrote:
>
> --On Tuesday, June 19, 2007 15:15:25 -0500 Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Bill Moran wrote:
>>> In response to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> I just recently update one
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
>
>>> What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
>>>
>>>
>> I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
>>
>> Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
>>
>>
>> This is on an old 4.11 system updated
--On Tuesday, June 19, 2007 15:15:25 -0500 Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Bill Moran wrote:
>> In response to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
>>
>>
>
> I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
>
> Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
>
>
> This is on an old 4.11 system updated to latest stable. xauth does
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Bill Campbell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
In response to Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> >> I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
> >> sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
> >> via ssh from remote cl
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>> I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
>> sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
>> via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults for sshd change lately
>> or is the
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
>sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
>via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults for sshd change lately
>or is there some other culprit?
First m
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults for sshd change lately
or is there some other culprit?
I have verified that the client machine in question c
13 matches
Mail list logo