On 11/15/10 21:06, Chris Rees wrote:
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boostenpe...@boosten.org wrote:
He's consistent in any case (a quick google search reveals this 2008
message):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg192926.html
Consistent, but still just spouting
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Actually, I don't see anything incorrect in the above archive post.
I do. Cherry picking ZFS deficiencies without addressing the proper
documented way to work around them or at even acknowledging it's possible to
do so is
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Wojciech Puchar
woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a toy.
This is a result of that design.
Actually I find the basics of its design pretty simple (cow/txg/zil)
and for that reason I think it is
...
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of App Deb
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:32 PM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Modulok
Subject: Re: Is ZFS ready for prime time?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010
On 11/16/10 20:23, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Ivan Vorasivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Actually, I don't see anything incorrect in the above archive post.
I do. Cherry picking ZFS deficiencies without addressing the proper
documented way to work around them or at
1) Is ZFS as of 8.1 Release considered to be ready for mission critical?
no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a
toy. This is a result of that design.
use UFS if you want something you can trust
___
On 15 November 2010 08:28, Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
1) Is ZFS as of 8.1 Release considered to be ready for mission critical?
no. ZFS is not usable and will never be usable for anything more than a
toy. This is a result of that design.
use UFS if you want something
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
please elaborate
look at archives. i really don't want to repeat
On 15 November 2010 19:33, Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boosten pe...@boosten.org wrote:
He's consistent in any case (a quick google search reveals this 2008
message):
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg192926.html
Consistent, but still just spouting uninformed FUD.
Chris
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:33 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 15 November 2010 20:10, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:33 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On 15 November 2010 19:59, Peter Boosten pe...@boosten.org wrote:
On 15 nov 2010, at 20:37, Chris Rees wrote:
On 15 November 2010 19:33, Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 15 nov 2010, at 20:37, Chris Rees wrote:
On 15 November 2010 19:33, Wojciech Puchar woj...@tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
On 15 November 2010 20:10, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:33 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
Sounds like FUD.
Like the OP, I too am interested in the current state of ZFS. We've been
following the threads as far as build 28, and I do indeed see positive
improvement and continued development. However, is anyone that
On 15 November 2010 20:42, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Devin Teske dte...@vicor.com wrote:
Sounds like FUD.
Like the OP, I too am interested in the current state of ZFS. We've been
following the threads as far as build 28, and I do indeed
On 15/11/2010 20:33, krad wrote:
My gut feeling is no. I wouldn't put it on mission critical stuff yet. Its
not that I have had any major bad experiences (x fingers) but im not aware
of any major deployments of it in the wild. As a result I wouldnt feel safe
being the 1st 8)
What I would
One problem I ran into is that the file sharing technologies in
FreeBSD have not kept up; I consider NFSv4 a requirement for sanely
sharing ZFS over a network, and FreeBSD's NFSv4 server is still under
heavy development and not yet production-ready. That may not matter
for a backup server,
List,
I'm ready to build a backup server and have two questions...
1) Is ZFS as of 8.1 Release considered to be ready for mission critical?
2) If I put ZFS on top of geli, will this, in any way, (other than
performance) impair ZFS's features? For example would stuff like the
ability to self heal
20 matches
Mail list logo
